Rejectment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: rejectment Year: 1959 Page 1 of about 989 results (0.033 seconds)Sajjan Singh Vs. Smt. Jamuna Bala Devi and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-26-1959
Reported in: AIR1960All410
..... act purporting to terminate the tenancy was invalid as it was unsigned both the courts rejected all the contentions of the appellant and decreed the suit for ejectment a decree for ..... by one landlord only the others could not take advantage of it this plea was rejected on the ground that in a case of joint landlords an application for permission by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Krishna Prasad Vs. Mohd. Yahia
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-11-1959
Reported in: AIR1960All482
..... and eviction act but in view of the purpose of section 3 it must be rejected the words used are no suit shall without the permission of the district magistrate be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Prakash Vs. Shambhu Dayal Agarwal and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-31-1959
Reported in: AIR1960All395
..... is also not in dispute that the rent control and eviction officer rejected the application on the ground that as long as the tenant or ..... that he wanted the accommodation for his own use this too was rejected by the rent control and eviction officer on the ground that ..... made another application for the eviction of the tenant which again was rejected on the ground that it was open to the landlord to file .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWaman Shriniwas Kini Vs. Ratilal Bhagwandas and Co.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-16-1959
Reported in: AIR1959SC689; (1959)61BOMLR1011; [1959]Supp(2)SCR217
..... could not be termed his licensees these contentions are without substance and have rightly been rejected 7 it was then argued that under s 15 of the act there is no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhinka and ors. Vs. Charan Singh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-24-1959
Reported in: AIR1959SC960; 1959CriLJ1223; [1959]Supp(2)SCR798
..... 5 the first two contentions need not detain us as we are rejecting the contentions of the learned counsel for the appellants on all ..... in regard to its genuineness in this case the three courts rejected the document on the ground that it was not genuine on ..... this argument is based upon the fact that the additional commissioner while rejecting the certified copy of the khatauni of 1355 fasli filed by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSharafat Ullah Khan Vs. Raja Udairaj Singh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-02-1959
Reported in: AIR1959All416
..... above amendment in 1954 in clause a rendered the claim for ejectment liable to be rejected in the suit to which appeal no 321 of 53 relates the two courts below .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunder Lal Vs. Ram Krishan and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-04-1959
Reported in: AIR1960All544
..... notice to quit and therefore the suit for ejectment was not maintainable the trial court rejected the defence and decreed the suit and the appellate court upheld this decision the appellant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMula and anr. Vs. Babu Ram and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-28-1959
Reported in: AIR1960All573
..... their case the objection was raised for the first time before the appellate court and rejected by it it is repeated again in this court in my view this is not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhe Shyam Agarwal Vs. Kashinath Vaish and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-1959
Reported in: AIR1960MP169
..... apparent i hold that the defendant s application of august 6 1957 has been rightly rejected 17 this revision is therefore dismissed withcosts courts have evolved certain well defined principles for ..... apparent i hold that the defendant s application of august 6 1957 has been rightly rejected
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Vajrapuri Naidu and anr. Vs. the New theatres Carnatic Talkies Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-24-1959
Reported in: AIR1960Mad108
..... art 19 1 f and this objection was upheld by the calcutta high court in rejecting this contention the supreme court held that the provisions of art 19 could only apply ..... belonging to others and could not be held to be for a public purpose in rejecting this argument we rely upon the principle laid down by a bench of this court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial