Regulize - Judgment Search Results

Central Electricity Regul. Commission Vs. Damodar Valley Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Limited (supra) with regard to the efficacy of the Tariff Regulations in the light of its statutory character must necessarily be

The Regulation Collector of Uthumalai Estate Vs. R. Subbier

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1908)18MLJ581

Collector, was appointed on the 20th September 1901.3. A new Regulation Collector was appointed on the 30th October 1901, and, as

“relying Upon Regulation 19 of the Rajiv Gandhi National Vs. Rajiv G ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the students having failed to fulfill the requirement of RGNUL Regulations, have no right to special examination in December 2012 and

Bethuadahari Regulated Market Committee Vs. Tapan Kumar Saha and Other ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1991Cal371,95CWN550

produce as may be specified in the notification, shall be regulated.6. Under Section 5 of the Act a Market Committee for

The Sakhigopal Regulated Market Committee Vs. Brudaban Chandra Hota an ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1991Ori252

ORDER1. An interesting question that arises for consideration in this revision is whether any local authority or company for whose...

Christoph Bornman Vs. National Credit Regulator

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

act professionally thereby ensuring that he would not bring the Regulator or debt counselling into disrepute (general condition A 2); not

Brihanmumbai Electric Sup.and Tran.Underta Vs. Maharashtra Elect.Regul ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

regulatory responsibilities from the Government and giving it to the Regulatory Commissions. With these objectives in mind the Electricity Act, 2003

Talcher Municipality Vs. Talcher Regulated Mkt. Committee and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC3954; 99(2005)CLT174(SC); JT2004(6)SC65; 2004(6)SCALE339; (2004)6SCC178; (2004)3UPLBEC2852

The said Act, as noticed hereinbefore, was enacted for better regulation of buying and selling of agricultural produce.14. The power to

Union of India Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and Ano ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1987(12)ECC384

India in contravention of section 9(1)(d) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.' 3. Shri Issar Das was required to show

Union of India Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and anr ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1990]68CompCas46(Delhi); 32(1987)DLT278; 1987RLR270

India in contravention of Section 9(1)(d) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.' (3) Shri Issar Das was required to show