Regulatory - Judgment Search Results

Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. M/s Bharti Airtel Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A.NO.46116 OF2020IN CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 250­252 OF2019TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. AND ORS. ETC. …RESPONDENT(S) ORDER1 Pending the appeals against

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

2024 INSC791IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 3098-3099 of 2023 Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India …Appellant Versus Delhi International Airport Ltd. & Ors. …Respondents With Civil Appeal Nos.1798-1799 of 2021

Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission versus Tata Power Delhi Distri ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2026] 5 S.C.R. 441

[2026] 5 S.C.R. 441 : 2026 INSC 461Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited (Civil Appeal No. 6388 of 2025) 07 May 2026 [Pamidighantam Sri

Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. L.i. Parija and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2006(3)JCR199(SC)]; JT2006(2)SC155; 2006(1)SCALE337; (2006)1SCC637

directed against the interim orders passed by the Orissa High Court directing, in essence, restraining the Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (in short 'the Commission')-appellant herein from taking steps in the matter of fixation of tariff for the

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. Gajendra Haldea and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(3)AWC2669(SC); 2009LC(SC)508; JT2009(14)SC317; (2009)11SCC556

(in short the `Act').2. The primary stand of the appellant is that though the Tribunal accepted that Electricity Regulatory Commissions (in short the `Regulatory Commission') did not have any power to determine tariff for trading, it invoked

Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. Bses Yamuna Power Limited ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2007(8)SC409; 2007(3)SCALE289; (2007)3SCC33

an asset arising from use, efflux of time and market changes. It was further held that from a regulatory perspective, depreciation is a small amount of the original cost of the capital asset(s), built into the tariff

Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2008SC976; 2007(4)AWC3662(SC); 2008(1)BomCR738; JT2007(10)SC365; 2007(10)SCALE279; (2007)8SCC381; [2007] 9 SCR 9

allowed the appeals filed by the distribution companies and set aside the orders passed by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter for short 'The Commission') dated 23.2.2005. The Commission on 3.8.2004 addressed a notice to all its

Fee Regulatory Committee Vs. Kalol Institute of Management, Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

of determining the fees for admission of students in the professional educational colleges or institutions, constitute a Fee Regulatory Committee with a retired judge of the High Court nominated by the State Government as its Chairperson. Section

Pension Fund Regulatory & Development Authority (Pfrda) vs.subroto Das

Court: Delhi

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.6981/2015 % Reserved on:16. h January, 2017 Date of Decision:15. h March, 2017 PENSION FUND REGULATORY & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PFRDA) SUBROTO DAS Through: Mr. Shanker Raju, Advocate. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Prateek Tushar Mohanty,

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India vs.kabir Shankar Bose

Court: Delhi

DELHI Date of decision:20. h November, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12388/2018 & CAV10562018 & CM APPLs. 48059- 48060/2018 TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Mr. Abhishek and Mr. Sarahsh Gupta, Kumar Advocates. versus