Regulations - Judgment Search Results

Central Electricity Regul. Commission Vs. Damodar Valley Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of India

that may be in conflict with those of the Tariff Regulations will however not have the same effect inasmuch as the

The Regulation Collector of Uthumalai Estate Vs. R. Subbier

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1908)18MLJ581

If the Decree Collector was in doubt, or if the Regulation Collector, on behalf of the estate, disputed the claim, it

“relying Upon Regulation 19 of the Rajiv Gandhi National Vs. Rajiv G ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the students having failed to fulfill the requirement of RGNUL Regulations, have no right to special examination in December 2012 and

Bethuadahari Regulated Market Committee Vs. Tapan Kumar Saha and Other ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1991Cal371,95CWN550

produce as may be specified in the notification, shall be regulated.6. Under Section 5 of the Act a Market Committee for

The Sakhigopal Regulated Market Committee Vs. Brudaban Chandra Hota an ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1991Ori252

ORDER1. An interesting question that arises for consideration in this revision is whether any local authority or company for whose...

Christoph Bornman Vs. National Credit Regulator

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

fees from consumers as provided for in the Act and Regulations. The Debt Counsellor must not receive fees, commission or any

Brihanmumbai Electric Sup.and Tran.Underta Vs. Maharashtra Elect.Regul ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

direct the respondent to pay compensation to the petitioner under Regulations 3.2 and 12 of MERC (Standards of Performance of Distribution

Talcher Municipality Vs. Talcher Regulated Mkt. Committee and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC3954; 99(2005)CLT174(SC); JT2004(6)SC65; 2004(6)SCALE339; (2004)6SCC178; (2004)3UPLBEC2852

agricultural produce in the market shall be subject to the regulation for which the same has been enacted. The expression 'regulation'

Union of India Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and Ano ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1987(12)ECC384

contravened the provisions of section 9(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. Similarly by making another payment of Rs.56,500 to

Union of India Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and anr ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1990]68CompCas46(Delhi); 32(1987)DLT278; 1987RLR270

proceedings as contained in Section 51 of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 be not held against him, for the aforesaid