Regulation - Judgment Search Results

Central Electricity Regul. Commission Vs. Damodar Valley Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of India

the provisions of the 2003 Act and the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) 6 Regulations, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as “Tariff Regulations”) framed thereunder. Accordingly, the CERC proceeded to determine the tariff after

“relying Upon Regulation 19 of the Rajiv Gandhi National Vs. Rajiv G ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

issued following contention of counsel for the petitioners was noticed by this Court on 16.11.2012 :- “Relying upon Regulation 19 of the Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law Regulations, it is contended that petitioners are entitled to

The Sakhigopal Regulated Market Committee Vs. Brudaban Chandra Hota an ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1991Ori252

ORDER1. An interesting question that arises for consideration in this revision is whether any local authority or company for whose benefit land is acquired by Government under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act can claim...

Bethuadahari Regulated Market Committee Vs. Tapan Kumar Saha and Other ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1991Cal371,95CWN550

area within which purchase and sale of agricultural produce as may be specified in the notification, shall be regulated.6. Under Section 5 of the Act a Market Committee for every market area has to be constituted in

The Regulation Collector of Uthumalai Estate Vs. R. Subbier

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1908)18MLJ581

1. This appeal relates to a claim duly preferred to the Regulation Collector of the Uthumalai estate for a sum due to the claimant by the estate. The claim was

Talcher Municipality Vs. Talcher Regulated Mkt. Committee and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC3954; 99(2005)CLT174(SC); JT2004(6)SC65; 2004(6)SCALE339; (2004)6SCC178; (2004)3UPLBEC2852

Section 4(4) of the Act has not been questioned.7. The Act has been enacted to provide for better regulation of buying and selling of agricultural produce and the establishment of markets for agricultural produce in the State.8.

Brihanmumbai Electric Sup.and Tran.Underta Vs. Maharashtra Elect.Regul ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

that the Hon’ble Commission may be pleased to direct the respondent to pay compensation to the petitioner under Regulations 3.2 and 12 of MERC (Standards of Performance of Distribution Licensees, Period of Giving Supply and Determination of

Jasjit Singh and anr. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Board and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR214; 2007(3)BomCR854

Mhase S.B., J.1. These three appeals have been directed as against the order passed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board on April 29, 1980 in Appeal Nos. 329, 371 and 372 of 1979. These three appeals

Arunkumar Spinning Mill Ltd., Represented by Its Managing Director, Mr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2007)2MLJ413

examine the record of any market committee in respect of any proceeding to satisfy themselves as to the regularity of such proceedings or the correctness, legality or propriety of any decision and if in any case, it

Gandaram Bhoi Vs. Regulated Market Co

Court: Orissa

petitioner with reference to the order sheet under Annexure-1 submits that as the Collector, Subarnapur-cum-Chairman, Dunguripali, by order Regulated dated Market 25.08.2006 had Committee, directed for reinstatement of the petitioner, with effect from the said date, petitioner