Register - Judgment Search Results
Kohli Brothers Registered Partnership Firm Through Its Partner Mr. San ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-16-2007
Reported in: AIR2008All43; 2008(2)ARBLR19(All); 2007(3)AWC2148
Amitava Lala, J.1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 6th February, 2007 passed by the learned District Judge, Allahabad in Misc. Arbitration Case No. 10 of 2007 rejecting the application under Section 9 of...
Binny Ltd. Registered Under the Companies Act, Represented by Manager ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-18-1998
Reported in: (1998)2MLJ379
S.S. Subramani, J.1. 1st Defendant in O.S. No. 1180 of 1971, on the file of the II Assistant City Civil Court, Madras, is the appellant.2. Two plaintiffs have filed a suit under Order 7, Rule 1...
Dominion of India Vs. the Delhi Registered Stock Holders (iron and Ste ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-08-1958
Reported in: AIR1958P& H270
of India against part of a decree which has been passed in favour of the respondent the Delhi Registered Slock Holders (Iron and Steel) Association Limited.2. The suit was instituted in June, 1949 against the Government through
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha a Trade Union Registered Under the Trade Unions ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-02-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ALLMR130
Recognition of other union :- (1) If any union makes an application to the Industrial Court for being registered as a recognised union in place of a recognised union already registered as such (hereinafter in this section
Marico Limited a Company Registered Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-20-2008
Reported in: AIR2008Bom111; 2008(3)BomCR659; (2008)110BOMLR638; 2008(37)PTC109(Bom)
Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The Appellants/ Original Plaintiffs are the registered proprietor of the designed article, for reference called 'Parachute Cap', since 1999. The Respondents Application for registration of
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a Company Incorporated and Registered Und ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-05-2005
Reported in: 2005CriLJ3500; 2005(3)MhLj512
police. Even otherwise, in case of investigation by the police, it is primarily required for the police to register FIR and only thereupon to proceed with the matter in accordance with the provisions of law. Merely for
Shramik Sena a trade union, registered under the Trade Unions Act, 192 ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-03-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)ALLMR708; 2006(5)BomCR616; (2006)IIILLJ628Bom
Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (for short 'the Act') for being registered as recognised Union of the workmen in the factory of respondent no.2 company at Thane. The petitioners' and
Manganese Ore (India) Limited a Company Registered Under the Companies ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-02-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)BomCR152
mention of the caste of the accused in the FIR, that cannot be a ground for either not registering the offence under Section 3 of the Act or for quashing such complaint - The submission was based
Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd., a Company Registered Under the Companies Act V ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-05-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR418; 2007(4)ARBLR385(Bom); 2007(4)MhLj230
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. This appeal arises from the order dated 30-4-1998 passed in Arbitration Petition No. 122 of 1998. By the impugned order, the appellants' petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...
Gharkul Industries Pvt. Ltd., a Company Registered Under the Companies ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-02-2009
Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR324; 2009(111)BomLR1691; [2009]20STT167
Ranjana Desai, J.1. Petitioner 1 is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner 2 is the director of petitioner 1. Respondent 1 is the Superintendent
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free