Refinery - Judgment Search Results

Mathura Refinery Mazdoor Sangh Through Its Secretary Vs. Indian Oil Co ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1991(62)FLR425]; JT1991(1)SC472; 1991(1)SCALE297; (1991)2SCC176; [1991]1SCR468; 1991(2)LC23(SC)

40 of 1986 published in the Gazette of India, New Delhi dated 21.10.89.2. The appellant is the Mathura Refinery Mazdoor Sangh (hereafter referred to as the 'Union'). The contesting respondent is the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Mathura

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Kochi Refinery, Ambalamugal, vs ...

Court: Kerala

A.M.BADAR TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 2ND BHADRA, 1943 PETITIONER: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, KOCHI REFINERY, AMBALAMUGAL, COCHIN-682302, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER I/C (HR), SHRI. KURIAN P. ALAPATT. BY ADVS. P.BENNY THOMAS

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Haldia Oil Refinery Vs. Haldia Refinery C ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2000)3CALLT19(HC)

respondents and the employees, the petitioners. (f) Canteen is subsidised, supervised and managed by the management of Haldla Refinery. (g) the wages and other facilities of the petitioners are being determined through negotiation with the management. (h)

Haldia Refinery Canteen Employees Union and ors. Vs. Indian Oil Corpor ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC2412; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)922; (SCSuppl)2005(3)CHN164; [2005(105)FLR1051]; JT2005(5)SC62; (2005)IILLJ684SC; (2005)5SCC51; 2005(2)SLJ440(SC); 2005(2)LC891(SC)

had allowed the writ application filed by the appellants and directed the Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia Oil Refinery (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent') to absorb the appellants in its service and regularise their services. Division

Bongalgaon Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd. Vs. SamijuddIn Ahmed

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001VIIAD(SC)365; [2001(90)FLR1167]; JT2001(7)SC252; 2002LabIC546; (2001)IILLJ1149SC; 2001(6)SCALE106; (2001)9SCC557

R.C. Lahoti, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant Bongaigaon Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd. is a Government of India company engaged in the industrial activity of refinery and petrochemicals.

Madras Refineries Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001VIIAD(SC)634; AIR2001SC3729; JT2001(8)SC194; 2001(6)SCALE469; (2001)8SCC568; [2001]124STC562(SC)

account and treating the same as sale price. 2. The undisputed facts are that the appellant has a refinery and major portion of its products are sold to different oil companies. According tot eh solicitor General, the

Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Vs. Daelim Industrial Company Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2007(3)ARBLR378(SC); 2007(4)AWC3998(SC); 2007BusLR88(SC); (2008)1CompLJ136(SC); JT2007(11)SC73; 2007(10)SCALE577; (2007)8SCC466; 2007(2)LC1057(SC)

ceased to exist. For our convenience we will take up DIC for all practical purpose. The appellant, Numaligarh Refinery Limited (hereinafter to be referred to as 'NRL') is a Government of India undertaking incorporated under the Companies

Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Vs. Green View Tea and Industries and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC1733; 2007(3)AWC3097(SC); 2008(3)GLT(SC)36; JT2007(8)SC238; 2007(4)SCALE400; (2007)9SCC242

Court for the lands in question.2. Special Leave Petition No.15810 of 2005 has been preferred by M/s. Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. for whose benefit the acquisition has been made, and is directed against the award of compensation for

Bongaigaon Refinery and P.C. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Girish Chandra Sarmah

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC2860; [2007(115)FLR4]; 2008(1)GLT(SC)5; JT2007(10)SC81; 2007(9)SCALE648; (2007)7SCC206; 2007AIRSCW5185

guilty was perverse and totally illegal. 3. The respondent while working as Deputy General Manager (POL-Marketing) in Bongaigaon Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited, Dhaligaon during the year 1998-99 was alleged to have committed serious misconduct for which he

Barauni Refinery Pragatisheel Shramik Parishad Vs. Indian Oil Corporat ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1801; [1991(61)FLR203]; JT1990(3)SC123; (1991)1SCC4; [1990]3SCR282; 1990(2)LC485(SC)

1. These two appeals by two different Trade Unions of Barauni Refinery are directed against the decision of the High Court of Delhi which set aside the modification of Clause