Refinery - Judgment Search Results
Mathura Refinery Mazdoor Sangh Through Its Secretary Vs. Indian Oil Co ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-15-1991
Reported in: [1991(62)FLR425]; JT1991(1)SC472; 1991(1)SCALE297; (1991)2SCC176; [1991]1SCR468; 1991(2)LC23(SC)
40 of 1986 published in the Gazette of India, New Delhi dated 21.10.89.2. The appellant is the Mathura Refinery Mazdoor Sangh (hereafter referred to as the 'Union'). The contesting respondent is the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Mathura
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Haldia Oil Refinery Vs. Haldia Refinery C ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-31-2000
Reported in: (2000)3CALLT19(HC)
respondents and the employees, the petitioners. (f) Canteen is subsidised, supervised and managed by the management of Haldla Refinery. (g) the wages and other facilities of the petitioners are being determined through negotiation with the management. (h)
Haldia Refinery Canteen Employees Union and ors. Vs. Indian Oil Corpor ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-29-2005
Reported in: AIR2005SC2412; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)922; (SCSuppl)2005(3)CHN164; [2005(105)FLR1051]; JT2005(5)SC62; (2005)IILLJ684SC; (2005)5SCC51; 2005(2)SLJ440(SC); 2005(2)LC891(SC)
had allowed the writ application filed by the appellants and directed the Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia Oil Refinery (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent') to absorb the appellants in its service and regularise their services. Division
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bongalgaon Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd. Vs. SamijuddIn Ahmed
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-04-2001
Reported in: 2001VIIAD(SC)365; [2001(90)FLR1167]; JT2001(7)SC252; 2002LabIC546; (2001)IILLJ1149SC; 2001(6)SCALE106; (2001)9SCC557
R.C. Lahoti, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant Bongaigaon Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd. is a Government of India company engaged in the industrial activity of refinery and petrochemicals.
Madras Refineries Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-18-2001
Reported in: 2001VIIAD(SC)634; AIR2001SC3729; JT2001(8)SC194; 2001(6)SCALE469; (2001)8SCC568; [2001]124STC562(SC)
account and treating the same as sale price. 2. The undisputed facts are that the appellant has a refinery and major portion of its products are sold to different oil companies. According tot eh solicitor General, the
Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Vs. Daelim Industrial Company Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-06-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)ARBLR378(SC); 2007(4)AWC3998(SC); 2007BusLR88(SC); (2008)1CompLJ136(SC); JT2007(11)SC73; 2007(10)SCALE577; (2007)8SCC466; 2007(2)LC1057(SC)
ceased to exist. For our convenience we will take up DIC for all practical purpose. The appellant, Numaligarh Refinery Limited (hereinafter to be referred to as 'NRL') is a Government of India undertaking incorporated under the Companies
Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Vs. Green View Tea and Industries and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-15-2007
Reported in: AIR2007SC1733; 2007(3)AWC3097(SC); 2008(3)GLT(SC)36; JT2007(8)SC238; 2007(4)SCALE400; (2007)9SCC242
Court for the lands in question.2. Special Leave Petition No.15810 of 2005 has been preferred by M/s. Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. for whose benefit the acquisition has been made, and is directed against the award of compensation for
Bongaigaon Refinery and P.C. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Girish Chandra Sarmah
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-08-2007
Reported in: AIR2007SC2860; [2007(115)FLR4]; 2008(1)GLT(SC)5; JT2007(10)SC81; 2007(9)SCALE648; (2007)7SCC206; 2007AIRSCW5185
guilty was perverse and totally illegal. 3. The respondent while working as Deputy General Manager (POL-Marketing) in Bongaigaon Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited, Dhaligaon during the year 1998-99 was alleged to have committed serious misconduct for which he
Barauni Refinery Pragatisheel Shramik Parishad Vs. Indian Oil Corporat ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-17-1990
Reported in: AIR1990SC1801; [1991(61)FLR203]; JT1990(3)SC123; (1991)1SCC4; [1990]3SCR282; 1990(2)LC485(SC)
1. These two appeals by two different Trade Unions of Barauni Refinery are directed against the decision of the High Court of Delhi which set aside the modification of Clause
The Madras Refineries Ltd. Vs. the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-05-1977
Reported in: AIR1977SC500; (1977)2SCC308; [1977]2SCR564; 1977(9)LC117(SC)
laws of United States of America, stated that as the Company was in the process of constructing a refinery for the refining of crude oil and deemed it necessary to borrow money from time to time to
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free