From

Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Refinery - Judgment Search Results

Feb 15 1991

Mathura Refinery Mazdoor Sangh Through Its Secretary Vs. Indian Oil Co ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-15-1991

Reported in: [1991(62)FLR425]; JT1991(1)SC472; 1991(1)SCALE297; (1991)2SCC176; [1991]1SCR468; 1991(2)LC23(SC)

India, New Delhi dated 21.10.89.2. The appellant is the Mathura Refinery Mazdoor Sangh (hereafter referred to as the 'Union'). The contesting

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 2000

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Haldia Oil Refinery Vs. Haldia Refinery C ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-31-2000

Reported in: (2000)3CALLT19(HC)

is subsidised, supervised and managed by the management of Haldla Refinery. (g) the wages and other facilities of the petitioners are

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 29 2005

Haldia Refinery Canteen Employees Union and ors. Vs. Indian Oil Corpor ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-29-2005

Reported in: AIR2005SC2412; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)922; (SCSuppl)2005(3)CHN164; [2005(105)FLR1051]; JT2005(5)SC62; (2005)IILLJ684SC; (2005)5SCC51; 2005(2)SLJ440(SC); 2005(2)LC891(SC)

appellants and directed the Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Haldia Oil Refinery (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent') to absorb the appellants

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 2001

Bongalgaon Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd. Vs. SamijuddIn Ahmed

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-04-2001

Reported in: 2001VIIAD(SC)365; [2001(90)FLR1167]; JT2001(7)SC252; 2002LabIC546; (2001)IILLJ1149SC; 2001(6)SCALE106; (2001)9SCC557

R.C. Lahoti, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant Bongaigaon Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd. is a Government of India company engaged

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 2001

Madras Refineries Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-18-2001

Reported in: 2001VIIAD(SC)634; AIR2001SC3729; JT2001(8)SC194; 2001(6)SCALE469; (2001)8SCC568; [2001]124STC562(SC)

2. The undisputed facts are that the appellant has a refinery and major portion of its products are sold to different

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 2007

Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Vs. Daelim Industrial Company Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-06-2007

Reported in: 2007(3)ARBLR378(SC); 2007(4)AWC3998(SC); 2007BusLR88(SC); (2008)1CompLJ136(SC); JT2007(11)SC73; 2007(10)SCALE577; (2007)8SCC466; 2007(2)LC1057(SC)

take up DIC for all practical purpose. The appellant, Numaligarh Refinery Limited (hereinafter to be referred to as 'NRL') is a

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2007

Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Vs. Green View Tea and Industries and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-15-2007

Reported in: AIR2007SC1733; 2007(3)AWC3097(SC); 2008(3)GLT(SC)36; JT2007(8)SC238; 2007(4)SCALE400; (2007)9SCC242

Petition No.15810 of 2005 has been preferred by M/s. Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. for whose benefit the acquisition has been made, and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 2007

Bongaigaon Refinery and P.C. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Girish Chandra Sarmah

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-08-2007

Reported in: AIR2007SC2860; [2007(115)FLR4]; 2008(1)GLT(SC)5; JT2007(10)SC81; 2007(9)SCALE648; (2007)7SCC206; 2007AIRSCW5185

respondent while working as Deputy General Manager (POL-Marketing) in Bongaigaon Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited, Dhaligaon during the year 1998-99 was alleged

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 1990