Rectify - Judgment Search Results
Hind Rectifiers Limited Vs. Presiding Officer, Ist Labour Court, Bomba ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-03-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)BomCR543; (2001)1BOMLR78; [2001(89)FLR55]; (2000)IIILLJ300Bom; 2000(4)MhLj622
ORDERS. K. Shah, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 Union.2. The writ petition has been filed by the employer challenging the order of...
Usha Rectifier Corpn. (i.) (P.) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assitant Commissio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-1989
Reported in: [1989]30ITD1(Delhi); (1989)34TTJ(Del)209
ORDERPer Chander - This appeal by the assessed is directed against the order of the CIT (A) New Delhi dated 22-1-1986 relating to asst. year 1979-80. This appeal was filed and was marked by the Registry...
Ruttonsha International Rectifier Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-1996
Reported in: 1996IIIAD(Delhi)681; 1996(38)DRJ265
into a contract on December 20, 1973 with the petitioner for supply of four numbers of mobile transformer rectifiers and their spares. Date for completion of the supplies was fixed as April 30, 1974. However, subsequently the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hind Rectifiers Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-16-1981
Reported in: [1981]47STC303(Bom)
Manohar, J.1. The applicants are registered dealers under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. They manufacture and sell rectifiers. During the relevant period, the applicants were assessed to payment of sales tax by the Sales Tax Officer
Ruttonsha Internil Rectifier Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-12-2002
Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT947Tri(Mum.)bai
1. When this petition for stay came up for hearing it has been agreed that the appeal itself can be disposed of. We, therefore, proceed to dispose of the appeal.2. The contention raised by the appellant...
Hind Rectifiers Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-1988
Reported in: (1989)(39)ELT661TriDel
2. The Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay by his order S49-728/82R dated 22.11.1982 said that he had gone through the facts of the case and the submissions made by the appellants and that under conditions of...
Usha Rectifiers Corp (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-1989
Reported in: (1990)LC342Tri(Delhi)
1. In all these three appeals, the appellants have challenged the correctness of the orders-in-original passed by Addl. Collector of Customs, New Delhi vide orders C. No. 14/87 dated 31-1-1987 in respect of Bill of Entries...
Usha Rectifier Corporation Vs. Collr. of Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-1997
Reported in: (1997)(93)ELT71TriDel
Customs, New Delhi on 11-6-1983 intimated the original authority that the bill of entry were filed by Usha Rectifier on their behalf as per their letter of authority dated 10-4-1982. They also authorised Usha Rectifier Corpn. in
Usha Rectifier Corpn. (i) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2000
Reported in: (2001)(73)ECC771
1. This appeal has been filed by M/s. Usha Rectifier Corporation Ltd. against the Order-in-Appeal No. 549/92, dated 29-10-1992.2. Briefly stated the facts are that a show cause
Chinar Trust Vs. Usha Rectifier Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2005
Reported in: 2005(30)PTC441(Del)
B.A. Khan, J.1. All these appeals arises out of a common order dated 24.4.2000 allowing the CM (M) Nos. 252, 253 & 254/1990 filed by respondent holding that he is entitled to extension of time in...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free