Recordation - Judgment Search Results
Lahari Recording Company Limited Rep. by Its Managing Director Vs. Mus ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2008
Reported in: 2008(3)CTC385; LC2008(2)341; 2008(37)PTC121(Mad)
print and publish a manuscript, or to sell a gramophone record with a view to its public performance, where the acts
Indian Record Manufacturing Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-15-2008
Reported in: [2008(117)FLR164],(2008)IILLJ575Cal
Alok Kumar Basu, J.1. I have taken up this writ petition for disposal in presence of the learned advocate for...
Taken on Record. Vs. M/S Dayanand Medical College and Hospital Ludhian ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
which was disposed of on 22.3.2013. As per facts on record, the applicant filed above said Arbitration application with a prayer
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
The Record of the Case Was Burnt in Accidental Fire in High Vs. K.L.Ma ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
for respondent No.2 – Himachal Roadways. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) The record of the case was burnt in accidental fire in High
Saraswati Recording Studio and Others Vs. Ranbir Singh and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
No.409 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision :27. 1.2014 Saraswati Recording Studio and others ....Petitioners Versus Ranbir Singh and others ...Respondents
Trial Court Records Were Also Requisitioned. on 18.07.2013 It Vs. Smt. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
Notice of motion was issued on 05.03.2013. The trial Court records were also requisitioned. On 18.07.2013 it Amit Kaundal 2014.04.28 13:48
Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore Vs. Sourabh Market ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-08-2000
Reported in: ILR2000KAR5057; 2001(4)KarLJ78
ORDER1. Petitioner-M/s. Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore, is defendant in O.S. No. 8125
Punjab Recorders Ltd. Vs. M/S. Magnetic Information Technology Ltd.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-05-1994
Reported in: AIR1995P& H29
being influenced by anything stated herein .9. For the reasons recorded above, I find no merit in the petition and the
George V. Records, Sarl Vs. Kiran Jogani and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2004
Reported in: 2004(28)PTC347(Del)
2003.2. This Court on consideration of documents and material on record, granted an ad-interim ex-parte injunction restraining the defendants from reproducing,
Master Recording Company Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-28-1992
Reported in: 1993(63)ELT60(Mad)
and the counter and reply affidavits filed herein and the records relating to the order in (1) File C. No. V/68/18/70/82-R.C.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free