Reclaiming - Judgment Search Results

Dewan Reclaim Rubber Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(168)ELT200TriDel

2. Appellants filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the demand was confirmed on the ground that their application for remission of duty has already been rejected and the appellants have...

Vijaya Rubber Reclaim Company Vs. the Divisional Manager, the New Indi ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

P. Ramakrishnam Raju, President: 1. The complainant is a small-scale industry and is recognized as such by the Industries Department. The complainant has taken the policy covering flood and cyclone risk for all items except 5...

Rubber Reclaim Co. of India Pvt. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1991)(32)ECC352

through a Grinding Mill and are powdered. The powder is then put into an Autoclave and mixed with Reclaiming Agents. Chemicals and oils and subjected to steam pressure for devulcanisation. The devulcanised material is then plasticised, strained

Gujarat Reclaim and Rubber Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1998)(99)ELT455Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The appellants manufacture reclaimed rubber falling under Chapter 40 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They sell their goods on the basis

Gujarat Reclaim and Rubber Vs. Collector of Central Excise and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)(14)ELT2401TriDel

No. 1262/79 dated nil passed by the Appellate Collector of Central Excise & Customs, Bombay.2. The factory, Gujarat Reclaim & Rubber Products Ltd., Ankleshwar (Gujarat) cleared some quantities of goods they call hard rubber. This hard rubber

State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Rubber Reclaim Co.of India (P) Ltd.Andan ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.708 OF 201.(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CIVIL)NO.25465 OF 2011.STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS RUBBER RECLAIM CO. OF INDIA RESPONDENT WITH C.A.No.700 OF 201.@ S.L.P.(C)NO.25459/2011 C.A.No.703 OF 201.@ S.L.P.(C)NO.25458/2011 AND WITH C.A.No.710 OF 201.@

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Gujarat Reclaim and Rubber

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)(104)ECC398

we reproduced the relevant paragraph of the Commissioner (Appeal) orders: I observe that the appellants are manufacturers of reclaim rubber products falling under Chapter sub heading No. 4003.00 and the old tyres etc. are required for the

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.m/s. Dewan Reclaim Rubber

Court: Delhi

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant 1st August, 2017 Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate. Through: versus M/S. DEWAN RECLAIM RUBBER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashim Vachher, Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Dabas, Advocate and Mr. Sumeet, Advocate. CORAM:

Kerala Rubber and Reclaims Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [2002]127STC584(Ker)

S. Sankarasubban, J.1. Admittedly, reclaimed rubber was treated as rubber up to October 31, 1986. From November 1, 1986 by way of clarification

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kerala Rubber and Reclaims Ltd.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1997]228ITR683(Ker)

These are all relating to the assessment year 1985-86 in the matter of the assessee, Kerala Rubber and Reclaims Ltd., a company in which the public are substantially interested. The return was filed on October 10, 1985.