Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Reasoner - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results — plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 05 2012

for the Reasons Aforesaid I Find No Merit in This Second Appeal. Vs. B ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-05-2012

inside Abadi Deh and far away from khaSr.No.1182. For the reasons aforesaid, I find no merit in this second appeal. Concurrent


Feb 18 2014

Case the Reasoning Given by the Trial Court Is Perverse and therefore, ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-18-2014

Civil Judge (Jr. Division).Chandigarh has rejected the application by giving reasoning in paragraph 5 of the order which reads as follows:-


Feb 21 2014

is No Reason for This Court to Issue Any Such Direction as Vs. State o ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-21-2014

of this document CRM No.M-6543 of 2014 -2- is no reason for this Court to issue any such direction as prayed


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

Apr 22 2014

“for the Reasons Aforestated the Writ Petition Is Allowed to Vs. Bab ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-22-2014

yeaRs.Relevant portion of the order read as under: “For the reasons aforestated, the writ petition is allowed to the extent that


Sep 10 2012

M/S. Media Masters and Another Vs. M/S. Reasonable Advertising Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-10-2012

and utilize the FTC given to them, the Petitioners approached Reasonable Advertising Private Limited (“the Respondents”). Negotiations ensued between the parties.


Sep 10 2012

M/S. Media Masters and Another Vs. M/S. Reasonable Advertising Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-10-2012

and utilize the FTC given to them, the Petitioners approached Reasonable Advertising Private Limited (“the Respondents”). Negotiations ensued between the parties.


Mar 01 2013

“10. for the Reasons Recorded HereIn Above We Vs. State of Punjab an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-01-2013

aside. It has been held as under:- “10. For the reasons recorded herein above, we are of the opinion that the


Nov 30 2012

of Family Pension. No Rationale or Reason Has Either Been Disclosed in ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-30-2012

on 20.1.1998 in case. The Bench upheld the claim for reasons which are best quoted. Paragraphs 7 to 10 of the


Sep 09 2013

(A) That a Suit Must Fail by Reason of Some Vs. Pseb and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-09-2013

Court is satisfied,- (a) that a suit must fail by reason of some formal defect, or (b) that there are sufficient


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial