Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Reasonable Use - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 05 2012

for the Reasons Aforesaid I Find No Merit in This Second Appeal. Vs. B ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-05-2012

the plaintiff. In earlier suit filed by the plaintiff, counsel for the defendants made statement that defendants would use the patnala, mori and passage as they have been using earlier and Regular Second Appeal No.3422 of 2011 … that the suit land was reported to be inside Abadi Deh and far away from khaSr.No.1182. For the reasons aforesaid, I find no merit in this second appeal. Concurrent finding recorded by both the courts below to


Feb 18 2014

Case the Reasoning Given by the Trial Court Is Perverse and therefore, ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-18-2014

dated 25.9.2013. In the second round, the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division).Chandigarh has rejected the application by giving reasoning in paragraph 5 of the order which reads as follows:- “5. I have heard both sides and gone … the absence of the 6th defendant, the Court recorded that opportunity was given but not availed. The word used was “Nil”.Thereafter the proceedings went ex-parte against the 6th defendant. The ex-parte proceedings were set aside by an


Feb 21 2014

is No Reason for This Court to Issue Any Such Direction as Vs. State o ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-21-2014

12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM No.M-6543 of 2014 -2- is no reason for this Court to issue any such direction as prayed for, in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Section


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 22 2014

“for the Reasons Aforestated the Writ Petition Is Allowed to Vs. Bab ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-22-2014

initially be valid for a period of 5 yeaRs.Relevant portion of the order read as under: “For the reasons aforestated, the writ petition is allowed to the extent that the communication dated 25.11.2003 (Annexure P- 2) demanding


Sep 10 2012

M/S. Media Masters and Another Vs. M/S. Reasonable Advertising Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-10-2012

Time (“FCT”)per episode. 11. To market the serial and utilize the FTC given to them, the Petitioners approached Reasonable Advertising Private Limited (“the Respondents”). Negotiations ensued between the parties. Initially, a Memorandum of Understanding was entered into … accepting the statement so filed by the Respondents which covers the episode numbers up to 33 allotted FCT, use of FCT and banked FCT. This award, therefore, considering the agreement between the parties read with calculation so


Sep 10 2012

M/S. Media Masters and Another Vs. M/S. Reasonable Advertising Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-10-2012

Time (“FCT”)per episode. 11. To market the serial and utilize the FTC given to them, the Petitioners approached Reasonable Advertising Private Limited (“the Respondents”). Negotiations ensued between the parties. Initially, a Memorandum of Understanding was entered into … accepting the statement so filed by the Respondents which covers the episode numbers up to 33 allotted FCT, use of FCT and banked FCT. This award, therefore, considering the agreement between the parties read with calculation so


Mar 01 2013

“10. for the Reasons Recorded HereIn Above We Vs. State of Punjab an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-01-2013

relief claimed by the petitioner has been set aside. It has been held as under:- “10. For the reasons recorded herein above, we are of the opinion that the view taken by the learned Single Judge in


Nov 30 2012

of Family Pension. No Rationale or Reason Has Either Been Disclosed in ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-30-2012

a legislative measure like a statutory rule governing the grant of pension benefits should meet the test of reasonableness as contemplated under Article 14 of the Constitution. Admittedly, the parents of a deceased employee are eligible for … a minimum period of one year of continuous service without break. Note.1: The term one year continuous service used in para 4(i) above is inclusive of permanent/temporary service in a pensionable establishment but does not include periods


Sep 09 2013

(A) That a Suit Must Fail by Reason of Some Vs. Pseb and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-09-2013

minot or such other person. (3) Where the Court is satisfied,- (a) that a suit must fail by reason of some formal defect, or (b) that there are sufficient grounds for allowing the plaintiff to institute a … to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh Rs.No.4366 o”2. At this stage, it is useful to refer to the provisions of Order 23 CPC which reads thus: [“1. Withdrawal of suit or abandonment


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial