Reasonable Classification - Year 2016 - Judgments

Oct 06 2016 (SC)

Hiral P. Harsora and Ors. Vs. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-06-2016

..... protection of equal laws but laws may classify 54 a reasonable classification is one which includes all who are similarly situated and ..... of the principle that the difference which will warrant a reasonable classification need not be great however it has to be shown ..... their application to all the persons alike so a reasonable classification is not only permitted but is necessary if society should .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 2016 (HC)

Radhakrishna Kurup Vs. Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Oth ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-22-2016

..... now well settled forbids class legislation but does not forbid reasonable classification whether a classification is a permissible classification under article 14 or not two conditions must be satisfied ..... lordship a distinction should be drawn between discrimination without reason and discrimination with reason the whole doctrine of classification is based on this distinction and on the wellknown .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 2016 (HC)

Upendra Narayan Choudhary Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-12-2016

..... india as it violates the twin test of article 14 that there may be reasonable classification and that classification must have nexus with the object sought to be achieved by its maker although ..... it violates the twin test of article 14 which postulates that there may be reasonable classification and that classification must have nexus with the object sought to be achieved 17 the grievance of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 2016 (HC)

K.M. Chikkathayamma and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Urban Devel ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-10-2016

..... is permissible for these regimes to provide for different compensation regimes since article 14 permits reasonable classification reliance is also placed on section 105 of the la act 2013 which provides ..... discriminatory and violative of article 14 if a legislation fails the two pronged test of reasonable classification under article 14 it has to be held to be discriminatory and unconstitutional it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 2016 (HC)

Smt K M Chikkathayamma Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-10-2016

..... is permissible for these regimes to provide for different compensation regimes since article 14 permits reasonable classification reliance is also placed on section 105 of the la act 2013 which provides ..... discriminatory and violative of article 14 if a legislation fails the two pronged test of reasonable classification under article 14 it has to be held to be discriminatory and unconstitutional it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 2016 (HC)

B Govindaraj Hegde, 53 Yrs Vs. State of Karnataka - By Its Prl. Secret ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-22-2016

..... undoubtedly regulation of trade in liquor and it therefore cannot be said to be a reasonable classification saved under art 14 of the constitution 9 on the other hand learned addl advocate ..... merely lose the licence such blatant discrimination cannot possibly be justified on the criteria of reasonable classification under art 14 of the constitution of india 21 now coming to the judgments relied .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 2016 (HC)

Dr Mrs Bharati Sinha and Ors Vs. Human Resource Development

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-12-2016

..... india as it violates the twin test of article 14 that there may be reasonable classification and that classification must have nexus with the object sought to be achieved by its maker although ..... it violates the twin test of article 14 which postulates that there may be reasonable classification and that classification must have nexus with the object sought to be achieved 17 the grievance of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 2016 (HC)

M/s. Nagpur Distillers Private Limited and Another Vs. The State of Ma ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on: Jan-08-2016

..... the degree of harm and make reasonable classification but when such a classification is challenged the state is duty bound ..... to disclose the reasons for the ostensible conclusions its reason for ..... 121 concluded that the state failed to justify the classification between the exempted establishments and prohibited establishments on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 09 2016 (HC)

Daisy Kongari and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-09-2016

..... india as it violates the twin test of article 14 that there may be reasonable classification and that classification must have nexus with the object sought to be achieved by its maker although ..... it violates the twin test of article 14 which postulates that there may be reasonable classification and that classification must have nexus with the object sought to be achieved 18 the grievance of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 2016 (HC)

Basant Kumar Bilung and Ors Vs. Human Resource Development

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-12-2016

..... india as it violates the twin test of article 14 that there may be reasonable classification and that classification must have nexus with the object sought to be achieved by its maker although ..... it violates the twin test of article 14 which postulates that there may be reasonable classification and that classification must have nexus with the object sought to be achieved 17 the grievance of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Reasonable Classification - Judgment Search Results