Rear - Judgment Search Results
Surgeon Rear Admiral Manisha Jaiprakash Vs. Union of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.8896-8897 of 2012 Surgeon Rear Admiral Manisha Jaiprakash .... Appellant(s) versus Union of India & Ors. ….Respondent (s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.These
Rear Admiral(Retd) Balakrishnan Ravi Manon Vs. Ms. Vandana Jhingan and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2002
Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)1051; 97(2002)DLT286; 2002(62)DRJ318
Matched in: Parties Rear Admiral(Retd) Balakrishnan Ravi Manon Vs. Ms. Vandana Jhingan and ors.
Surgeon Rear Admiral P. Sivadas Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2005
Reported in: 125(2005)DLT558; 2005(85)DRJ620
(Navy) in its Medical Corps. During his tenure, he earned regular promotions up to the rank of a Rear Admiral/equivalent to Major General in the Army and Air Vice Marshal in the Air Force on 1st January,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rear Admiral Gupteshwar Rai Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-11-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)BomCR276
On 1st July, 1991 the petitioner was promoted as Captain. In July, 1991 the petitioner was promoted as Rear Admiral. The post of Rear Admiral is a tenure post of four years or upto the age of
Dilip Karambelkar Vs. Rear Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-04-1996
Reported in: AIR1997Bom131
date of withdrawal of writ petition No. 2757 of 1990 on 16th April, 1991 respondent No. 1 was Rear Admiral. Thereafter he was promoted as Fleet Commander on 27th Oct. 1991. Subsequently, he was promoted as Vice
M/S. Sai Poorna Heights Apartment Ownerand#8217;s Association, Rep by ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-24-2011
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash Annexure-K being the Bill issued by the R2 demanding the balance amount of Rs. 2,01,295/- vide Annexure-K...
Sahib Chandra Singh and on His Death His Rears and Legal Representativ ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-10-1922
Reported in: AIR1922Cal160,68Ind.Cas.86
1. This appeal arises cut of a suit for the recovery of possession of certain properties described in the plaint on establishment of the plaintiff's title thereto. The facts of the cases which are rather complicated...
Dockyard Employees Union Vs. Mazgaon Dock Ltd.,
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-12-2008
Reported in: [2009(121)FLR1068]
F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule. Heard forthwith.2. Petitioner is a Trade Union registered under the provisions of the Trade Unions Act. It has amongst its members workmen working with respondent No. 1, which is a State or...
Mirahul Enterprises and ors. Vs. Mrs. Vijaya Sirivastava and Mr. R.R. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-10-2002
Reported in: AIR2003Delhi15; 100(2002)DLT290
by learned Single Judge in two separate suits. Two appeals are by the plaintiffs Smt. Vijaya Srivastava and Rear Admiral R.R. Sood (Suit No. 451/86 and Suit No. 450/86) and the other two appeals are by the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free