Re Transfer - Judgment Search Results

Railroad Transfer Svc., Inc. Vs. City of Chicago

Court: US Supreme Court

annually go through this detailed application procedure. Outstanding licenses are revocable on a number of grounds at the city's discretion. [ that it does not retain as much power to deny Transfer a license as Transfer fears, [ Footnote 13 ] it

Central Transfer Co. Vs. Terminal R. Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

capacity of a private party to maintain a suit to restrain violations. See General Investment Co. v. New York Central R. Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal R. Assn. - 288 U.S. 469 (1933)

Topa S/O Dhenu Rathod Vs. Maheshkumar S/O Shankarlal

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1996(2)BomCR703

vesting of the time and the vesting of the property relates back to the time of sale 'only when the sale to any transfer of land under sub-section (1) any subsequent transfer of such land shall also be subject to the provisions

Adkins Transfer Co., Inc. Vs. Dornbos

Court: US Supreme Court

v. DORNBOS, 393 U.S. 322 (1969) 393 U.S. 322 ADKINS TRANSFER CO., INC., ET AL. v. DORNBOS ET AL. APPEAL FROM

Topa Mallah ? Jhora Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

evidence, as the Doctor has found injury on the parital region of the skull and laceration of brain with fracture of went to his mother's bedroom and saw that his father Topa Mallah @ Jhora was standing with an iron sabal (an

Raju @ Rajesh @ Topa Vs. State of M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)MPHT459; 2002(4)MPLJ225

seized from the appellant, presence of human blood has been reported. Moreover, it has come in the evidence of Sayyad Mustafa Ajit Singh, J. 1. Appellant Raju alias Rajesh alias Topa, the sole accused in this case, has been convicted under

Transfer Industry Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(108)ELT562TriDel

by the concerned Assistant Collector from time to time. The relevant period in question is March, 1986 to July, 1986 and

ishwar Nath Topa and ors. Vs. Surender Singh Ahluwalia

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1969Delhi289; 5(1969)DLT439

the execution proceedings. In it was held that the legal representatives can take advantage of the provisions of Section 30.17. The in cash to the judgment-debtor against the mortgage of the property and that the amount in excess of the double amount,

Wetzel Vs. Minnesota Ry. Transfer Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

the orphans' court in Philadelphia to make the sale, as required by the Page 169 U. S. 240 statute. This was at law of George W. Remsen against the Minnesota Railway Transfer Company and over two hundred other defendants to establish title

National Mut. Ins. Co. Vs. Tidewater Transfer Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

there is nothing to indicate that it would have been referred to as a state, and Page 337 U. S. 588 337 U.S. 582 (1949) National Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co., Inc. No. 29 Argued November 8, 1948 Decided June