Re Transfer - Judgment Search Results

Topa Mallah ? Jhora Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

(DB) No. 780 of 2010 Against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 08.06.2006 and 09.06.2006, respectively passed by Sri Anand Kumar Gupta, the learned 2nd Additional District & Session Judge, Gumla in Session Trial … Kumar Gupta, the learned 2nd Additional District & Session Judge, Gumla in Session Trial No. 63 of 2004. Topa Mallah @ Jhora Son of late Munna Mallah @ Jhora, resident of village-Bargitanr, P.O. and P.S. -Raidih, District-

Topa S/O Dhenu Rathod Vs. Maheshkumar S/O Shankarlal

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1996(2)BomCR703

date possession of his land is taken for such acquisition.(1A) Where any condition subject to which permission to transfer was granted is contravened, then the land in respect of which such permission was granted shall be liable … R.M. Lodha, J.1. The order passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Washim, on 14-9-1993, rejecting the application filed by the present applicant in the suit for framing of additional issues, is questioned in

Raju @ Rajesh @ Topa Vs. State of M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)MPHT459; 2002(4)MPLJ225

Sections 302 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life and seven years respectively (both sentences to run concurrently) by 1st Additional Judge to the Court of Sessions Judge, Bhopal, vide impugned … Ajit Singh, J. 1. Appellant Raju alias Rajesh alias Topa, the sole accused in this case, has been convicted under Sections 302 and 397 of the Indian Penal

ishwar Nath Topa and ors. Vs. Surender Singh Ahluwalia

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1969Delhi289; 5(1969)DLT439

Shri Surrinder Singh Ahluwalia, judgment debtor.2. A suit was filed against Shri Surrinder Singh Ahluwalia, Judgment-debtor, for the recovery of Rs.30,423.50paise on the basis of a mortgage. It was alleged that the judgment-debtor had mortgaged a house … the principal. The mortgages claimed to recover Rs. 30,423.50paise principal and interest, by the sale of the mortgaged property. The suit was contested by the judgment-debtor. He had raised various pleas.3. The learned Subordinate Judge, who was

Transfer Industry Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(108)ELT562TriDel

against the order of Additional Collector of Central Excise, Baroda dated 13-1-1992/21-2-1992.2. Learned Counsel stated that the issue relates to the classification and clearance of Ibuprofen I.P.3. The appellants are manufacturer of drugs and medicines and had

Railroad Transfer Svc., Inc. Vs. City of Chicago

Court: US Supreme Court

Railroad Transfer Svc., Inc. v. City of Chicago - 386 U.S. 351 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Railroad Transfer Svc., Inc. … STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Petitioner, in 1955, was engaged by the railroads in replacement of another motor carrier to transport passengers between rail terminals in Chicago. To block the replacement, the city

Adkins Transfer Co., Inc. Vs. Dornbos

Court: US Supreme Court

ADKINS TRANSFER CO., INC. v. DORNBOS - 393 U.S. 322 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court ADKINS TRANSFER CO., INC. v. DORNBOS,

Central Transfer Co. Vs. Terminal R. Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal R. Assn. - 288 U.S. 469 (1933) U.S. Supreme Court Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal … the Clayton Act that no one except the United States shall be thereby entitled to sue for injunctive relief against any common carrier subject to the Interstate Commerce Act "in respect of any matter subject to the

Vijayappan C vs Kerala Road Transfer Corporation

Court: Kerala

S/O. CHELLAPPAN, KARIKATHARAVELI VEEDU, WARD NO.4, MARARIKULAM NORTH PANCHAYATH, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688 523. BY ADV MOLTY MAJEED RESPONDENTS : 1 KERALA ROAD TRANSFER CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695

Rakhal Mandal Vs. Topa Baruah and ors.

Court: Guwahati

I.A. Ansari, J. 1. This revision has arisen out of the judgment and order, dated 29.8.1998, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) … for recovery of the possession of the suit land in terms of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act.4. The defendants-opposite party contested the suit, their case being, briefly stated, thus : The Defendants, Puspa Ram Baruah,