Re Store - Judgment Search Results

Neon Motor Stores and ors. Vs. Alliance Stores Trading Co. Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1974Guj168; (1974)0GLR272

1. The petitioners in the instant case are the original defendants while the respondents are the original plaintiffs. For the sake of convenience therefore, I will refer to the parties as plaintiffs … part of the said building as shown in the plaint Ex. 36 as given on lease to Alliance Stores Trading Company Ltd., who is the present plaintiff before us. Out of the premises which were let to

Delhi Book Store Vs. Shri K.S. Subramaniam, Sole Proprietor, the Coimb ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR2006Delhi206

the application for leave to defend the defendant claims to be the sole proprietor of M/s. Coimbatore Books Store and being familiar with the facts and circumstances of the case, has filed the application stating that the … 1. is No. 7418/2002 is an application filed by the defendant under Order 37 Rule 3, sub-rule 5 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') praying for grant of unconditional leave

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Qureshi Iron Stores

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1994]210ITR436(All)

are two cross-applications filed under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, one at the instance of the Revenue and the other by the assessee. Both these applications pertain to the assessment year 1984-85 and are directed

Bengal Agency and Stores Syndicate and ors. Vs. Stores and Engineering ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1952Cal411

are somewhat complicated & may be summarised as follows:2. In August 1949 this suit was filed for the recovery of Rs. 66961-11-0 for balance of principal & interest due for advance payments on account of price of … costs. The same view as in 'Atwood v. Chichester' was expressed by Jessel M. R. in 'Eaton v. Storer', (1883) 22 Ch. D. 91. He said,'The plff. was out of time, & in that case if a

Annapoorna Fertilisers and General Stores Vs. Arunodaya Fertilisers an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1994AP157; 1993(2)ALT577

Bantumilli, which was initially constituted with Sabbisetti Rattayya and others. That was dissolved on 1-11-1982 with the simultaneous retirement of the second defendant from the partnership. Thereafter, a new partnership was formed under the name and style … was the managing partner. The second defendant was one of partners of the firm Annapurna Fertilisers and General Stores, Bantumilli, which was initially constituted with Sabbisetti Rattayya and others. That was dissolved on 1-11-1982 with the simultaneous

Bharmal Medical Store Civil Hospital Badnagar Vs. State of m.p.

Court: Supreme Court of India

INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s).8590­8591 OF2018(arising out of SLP (C) No(s). 14871­14872 of 2015) BHARMAL MEDICAL STORE CIVIL HOSPITAL BADNAGAR ETC. VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS ….APPELLANT(S) ….RESPONDENT(S) with CIVIL APPEAL NO(s).8592 OF2018(arising … by open bid in 2000/2001. The lease period has long since expired and the lease has not been renewed. 2 4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the notice to vacate the shops in the hospital

Kailash Store Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(2)AWC1927(SC); 2009(5)SCALE148

the time of auction of the parking site. The court has further observed, that, no other dispute is referred to the Arbitrator except the dispute regarding 20% less area allegedly handed over to the appellant/applicant.3. The appellant

Mahabir Auto Stores and Others Vs. Indian Oil Corporation and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1031; [1990]69CompCas746(SC); 1990(1)SCALE410; (1990)3SCC752; [1990]1SCR818; 1990(2)LC62(SC)

No. 1 is a partnership firm. The other four appellants are the partners of the said firm. The respondent is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and having, inter alia, one of its regional

Lakshmi Bangle Stores Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: II(1991)ACC1; 1991ACJ262; JT1990(4)SC614; 1990(2)SCALE1187; (1991)1SCC448; [1990]Supp3SCR457

22,1964 and was damaged. Thereafter, the bangle-cases were transferred to another wagon by the Railway Authorities. The consignment reached Srikakulam on July 25, 1964 and an open assessment delivery of goods was made to the appellant on … Kuldip Singh, J.1. Messrs Lakshmi Bangle Stores instituted a suit for damages against the Eastern Railway and the South-Eastern Railway through Union of India. The

Rasik Auto Stores and ors. Vs. NavIn V. Hantodkar and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998VIIIAD(SC)319; AIR1999SC113; JT1998(7)SC569; 1998(6)SCALE101; (1998)8SCC177; [1998]Supp2SCR629

the petitioners. His only contention was that in the light of Clause 13(3)(vi) of the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949, because the landlord is having other premises of his own in the adjoining part of