Re Sign - Judgment Search Results

Sign Tech Vs Deputy State Tax officer-I

Court: Chennai

OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.320 and 322 of 2026 Sign Tech, Represented by its Partner, Thiru. Elangovan, No.556, Kollaimedu, Ayal Village, Nemili Taluk, Vellore - 632 505. ... Petitioner Vs.

M/s.Sign Makers Vs State Tax officer

Court: Chennai

OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 17.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.5960 & 5961 of 2026 M/s. Sign Makers, Rep by its Partner - Shahabudeen Peer Mohammed Pappanaickanpalayam, Coimbatore. ... Petitioner Vs. State Tax Officer, Office of the

Century Neon Signs, Vs Executive Engineer, Town Planning Section Kodam ...

Court: Chennai

14222, 14216, 14224, 14210, 14231, 14233, 14234, 14262, 14242, 14239, 14267 & 14263 of 2026 Century Neon Signs, Represented by its proprietor, Mr. P. Subramanian, Vadapalani, Chennai 600 026. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.12983/2026Abirami Enterprises Rep by O.V. Krishnan … 14211, 14222, 14216, 14224, 14210, 14231, 14233, 14234, 14262, 14242, 14239, 14267 & 14263 of 2026 Century Neon Signs, Represented by its proprietor, Mr. P. Subramanian, Vadapalani, Chennai 600 026. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.12983/2026Abirami Enterprises Rep by O.V.

Creative Sign Center by Its Partner vs Shri. Guruprasad M Katti

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.100144 OF 2025 BETWEEN: CREATIVE SIGN CENTER BY ITS PARTNER, SHRI VEERENDRA A KALBURGI, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: FIRST FLOOR, DAVANGMATH COMPLEX, … the appellant files a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to file a fresh petition.2. Memo reads thus;“Herein, the memo on behalf of petitioner above noted case appeal is not maintainable hence liberty may kindly

M/S. Sign Post India Ltd., vs Commissioner

Court: Karnataka

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 5552 OF 2024 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN:M/S. SIGN POST INDIA LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.202, (COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956), PRESSMAN HOUSE, 70-A, NEHRU ROAD, NEAR SANTACRUZ DOMESTIC AIRPORT,

Tvl. Sign Sites Publicities Vs Deputy State Tax officer II

Court: Chennai

: 14.02.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and W.M.P.Nos.5443, 5444, 5448, 5451, 5455 & 5456 of 2025 Tvl. Sign Sites Publicities (Represented By Its Proprietor Mohammed Jaffer Abdul Hassan) No.2F, Gee Gee Emerald, 312, Valluvarkottam High Road, … State Tax Officer II Valluvarkottam Assessment Circle, No.1, 6th Floor, PAPJM (Annexure) Building, Greams Road, Chennai 600006. ... Respondent in all petitions Common Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to

Brite Neon Signs Pvt Ltd Vs. Public Works Department (Pwd) and anr

Court: Delhi

PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD … DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + .....

Modern Neon Signs Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1978Delhi568

with the Exhibition (India)--1958. The agreement contained an arbitration clause. Disputes arose between the parties and they were referred to the arbitration of Mr. M.K. Koundinya. The arbitrator gave his award on November 7, 1975. The petitioner … R.N. Aggarwal, J.(1) Messrs Modern Neon Signs, petitioner herein, entered info a contract with the Central Public Works Department (C.P.W.D.), New Delhi on August 30,

Signs India Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT665Tri(Chennai)

Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras, dated 23-12-1991. Under the impugned order, the learned lower appellate authority had rejected the appellants plea for the benefit of MODVAT credit during the year 1989-90 based on a declaration which

U. Santhosh, vs M/S Sign Infra,

Court: Kerala

SRI. U.BALAKRISHNAN, UPPAMOOCHIKKAL HOUSE, PANAYAUR POST, VANIYAMKULAM , PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 522 BY ADVS. G.RAJAGOPAL S.LEELALAKSHMI RESPONDENTS: 1 M/S SIGN INFRA, DOOR NO: 46/2748 A(33/1687 A1), PUTHIYA ROAD, VENNALA P.O, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER