Re Sign - Judgment Search Results

Sign Tech Vs Deputy State Tax officer-I

Court: Chennai

OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.320 and 322 of 2026 Sign Tech, Represented by its Partner, Thiru. Elangovan, No.556, Kollaimedu, Ayal Village, Nemili Taluk, Vellore - 632 505. ... Petitioner Vs.

M/s.Sign Makers Vs State Tax officer

Court: Chennai

OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 17.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.5960 & 5961 of 2026 M/s. Sign Makers, Rep by its Partner - Shahabudeen Peer Mohammed Pappanaickanpalayam, Coimbatore. ... Petitioner Vs. State Tax Officer, Office of the

Century Neon Signs, Vs Executive Engineer, Town Planning Section Kodam ...

Court: Chennai

14222, 14216, 14224, 14210, 14231, 14233, 14234, 14262, 14242, 14239, 14267 & 14263 of 2026 Century Neon Signs, Represented by its proprietor, Mr. P. Subramanian, Vadapalani, Chennai 600 026. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.12983/2026Abirami Enterprises Rep by O.V. Krishnan … 14211, 14222, 14216, 14224, 14210, 14231, 14233, 14234, 14262, 14242, 14239, 14267 & 14263 of 2026 Century Neon Signs, Represented by its proprietor, Mr. P. Subramanian, Vadapalani, Chennai 600 026. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.12983/2026Abirami Enterprises Rep by O.V.

Brite Neon Signs Pvt Ltd Vs. Public Works Department (Pwd) and anr

Court: Delhi

PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel and Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD … DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5118/2013 & CM 11517/2013 M/S BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. & ANR Through: + .....

Modern Neon Signs Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1978Delhi568

with the Exhibition (India)--1958. The agreement contained an arbitration clause. Disputes arose between the parties and they were referred to the arbitration of Mr. M.K. Koundinya. The arbitrator gave his award on November 7, 1975. The petitioner … R.N. Aggarwal, J.(1) Messrs Modern Neon Signs, petitioner herein, entered info a contract with the Central Public Works Department (C.P.W.D.), New Delhi on August 30,

Signs India Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT665Tri(Chennai)

Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras, dated 23-12-1991. Under the impugned order, the learned lower appellate authority had rejected the appellants plea for the benefit of MODVAT credit during the year 1989-90 based on a declaration which

U. Santhosh, vs M/S Sign Infra,

Court: Kerala

SRI. U.BALAKRISHNAN, UPPAMOOCHIKKAL HOUSE, PANAYAUR POST, VANIYAMKULAM , PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 522 BY ADVS. G.RAJAGOPAL S.LEELALAKSHMI RESPONDENTS: 1 M/S SIGN INFRA, DOOR NO: 46/2748 A(33/1687 A1), PUTHIYA ROAD, VENNALA P.O, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER

Commissioner of Sales Tax, Delhi Vs. India Neon Signs

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1981]48STC439(Delhi)

Kapur, J.1. There are three sales tax references Nos. 33, 34 and 35 of 1973 before the Court. But they involve a common point. In each … to us is : 'Whether having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case the neon signs sold by the respondent are covered by the term 'electrical goods' within the meaning of entry No. 18

The Commissioner, Central Excise Vs. Bombay Neon Signs and Sign Crafts

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(166)ELT102Tri(Mum.)bai

a Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner of Central Excise's order dated 29.4.95. The facts are: M/s Bombay Neon Signs is a SSI unit, working under SS1 Notification 175/86 manufacturing illuminated Neon Signs (ch.9405) and non-illuminated neon sign … 1. This is a Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner of Central Excise's order dated 29.4.95. The facts are: M/s Bombay Neon Signs is

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Sign and Display Systems

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2006)(110)ECC40

1. Revenue has filed this appeal in respect of the OIO No. 06/2002 dated 28.02.2002 passed by the Commissioner of