Re Sign - Judgment Search Results

Modern Neon Signs Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1978Delhi568

as already stated, is whether the Court can pass judgment regarding a part of the award without waiting for the determination is not justified. hire charges for special type of Neon sign installed on gate No. 1 for 18 weeks. 5. Claimant

Brite Neon Signs Pvt Ltd Vs. Public Works Department (Pwd) and anr

Court: Delhi

or repair public streets and to the extent it is relevant, the said section reads as under:299. Functions of Commissioner in Ms. Namrata Sharma, Advs. for MCD W.P.(C) 869/2012 BRITE NEON SIGNS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv. versus

Signs India Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT665Tri(Chennai)

liable to duty in terms of exemption notification, he was required to file a fresh declaration under Rule 57G. I observe

The Commissioner, Central Excise Vs. Bombay Neon Signs and Sign Crafts

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(166)ELT102Tri(Mum.)bai

in the light of decisions in the cases of M/s Renu Tandon 1993(66) ELT 375, Steel Traders 1994 (55) ECR 348, SSI unit, working under SS1 Notification 175/86 manufacturing illuminated Neon Signs (ch.9405) and non-illuminated neon sign (ch. 8311.00). It is a

Commissioner of Sales Tax, Delhi Vs. India Neon Signs

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1981]48STC439(Delhi)

But it still remains to be explained why the utility remains during the daytime when the sign can easily be seen article advertised is visible to all. This means that the signs in question are not purely electrical goods and, accordingly, we

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Sign and Display Systems

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2006)(110)ECC40

grounds. (i) It is admitted by the assessee in his reply that the printing is done on self adhesive vinyl sheets

M/S. Arun Sign Service Vs. Trade Wings Limited

Court: Kolkata

interest during the pendency of a suit other than those referred to in the foregoing Rules and is based on the or about 23 February, 2010 the applicant company being Arun Sign PVT.LTD.was incorporated and a certificate of incorporation dated 23 February,

M/S. Suvidha Sign Studios Pvt. Ltd and Another Vs. Cce, Delhi-i

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

was issued to the appellants demanding duty on the value received by the appellants on their customers.  This show cause notice equal amount was imposed upon the appellants company M/s Suvidha Sign Studios Pvt. Ltd. besides that a penalty of Rs. 40

M/S. Arun Sign Works Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court: Kolkata

thereof, a tender has been issued calling for offers in respect of the hoardings to be effected in areas covered by COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.ARUN SIGN WORKS Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. BEFORE: The

ZoomIn Aura Architectural Signs Pvt. Ltd. Vs. New India Assurance Co. ...

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

that before issuing the aforesaid insurance policy on 20.5.2001, authorized representative of the OP company personally checked/tested the successful working of in the name and style of M/s. Zoomin Aura Architectural Signs Pvt. Ltd. To earn and his family livelihood and for