Re Resolve - Judgment Search Results

Action Committee for Resolving Gujarat Salt Manufactures Vs. Union of ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2005)1GLR889

all the contentions raised in the petition including the grievance regarding the tare weight of the wagon and weighment made on opportunities are given to all parties and disputed questions are resolved fully it would be for the concerned authority the court

Doe Vs. Eslava

Court: US Supreme Court

8 may 1822 giving certain powers to the registers and receivers of the land office did not confer upon them the

Sebi Vs. Karvy Stock Broking Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

editor the text of the vernacular matter has not been reproduced required 9 118 details of the afferent accounts bank accounts

Doe Vs. City of Mobile

Court: US Supreme Court

as a mere donation lot and that the register and receiver at st stephen s were authorized under the act of

Vinod Kumar JaIn and Sons Huf Vs. M/S Sarika Enterprises and ors

Court: Delhi

8 the rct had also noted that the evidence on record had established that m s aslv marketing is occupying an

In Re: Investigation Into Initial

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

were also called for from cdsl on perusal of inspection report it was found that cdsl gets its inspection conducted by

City of Mobile Vs. Eslava

Court: US Supreme Court

they were entitled to a verdict which instruction the court refused and a verdict was rendered for the defendant and judgment congress for recognition and on 14 december 1819 it was resolved that the state of alabama shall be one and is

In the Case of Vuckovic and Others Vs. Serbia

Court: European Court of Human Rights

the applicants had been practically identical and had consisted of ready made formulas in some cases though the constitutional court had is primarily for the national authorities notably the courts to resolve problems of interpretation of domestic legislation see p rez de

Chandigarh Housing Board Vs. Raj Kumar

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

him it may be stated here that when the complainant remained unsuccessful in the draw of lots and his case for

Chandigarh Housing Board Vs. Joginder Singh

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

dated 15 01 2014 rendered by the district consumer disputes redressal forum i u t chandigarh hereinafter to be called as