Re Hearing - Judgment Search Results
After Hearing Learned Counsel for Vs. Weeks. the
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2012
No. 11714/2011 (stay) Issue notice. Mr. Mohan M. Lal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the Court is of the opinion that the interim order sought, can be … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (Reportable) EX.P. 403/2010 and EA Nos. 734/2010, 735/2010, 353/2011. Reserved on: January 11, 2012 Decision on: January 13, 2012 KLEN and MARSHALLS MANUFACTURERS AND EXPORTERS LTD. ..... Decree
“after Hearing Respective Contentions of Both Vs.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
order dated 05.07.2011 (Annexure P-6).The Court of Revision while dismissing the revision petition has observed as under:- “After hearing respective contentions of both the sides and also having gone through the record carefully it is found that … 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and the order passed by the Court of Revision dated 05.07.2011 whereby order dated 08.09.2010 passed by the Trial Court was upheld. Learned counsel for the petitioners
“4. After Hearing the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner I Vs. Smt. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
in the year 1999. In CR-1356 o”3. Chand Singh's case (supra) this court held as follows:- “4. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in this revision petition. It is … CR-1356 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.1356 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision: July 17, 2013 Devi Singh ...Petitioner Versus Smt. Sila & others
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“after Hearing Learned Counsel for Both the Parties and Going Vs. Ma ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
which was also dismissed vide order dated 17.4.2012. The relevant portion of the order reads thus :- “After hearing learned counsel for both the parties and going through the record of the case file, it has come … Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.S.Sandhawalia Present:- Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr.D.Khanna, Addl. AG, Haryana Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.5 --- Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) This writ petition has been filed to set aside orders dated 17.4.2012
“8. After Hearing Arguments from Both the Sides and Perusing Vs. Fin ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
respondent No.4 as the lambardar and passed the following order: - LPA No.554 of 2012 -4- “6. After hearing counsel for the parties, record was perused and it was found that this post is meant for backward … 2013 Rattan Singh ....Appellant VERSUS Financial Commissioner, Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL Present: Mr.Mani Ram Verma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.D.Khanna, Addl.A.G., Haryana, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.L.N.Verma,
“after Hearing Both the Counsel for the Vs. Raj Kumar
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-05-2012
factum of the filing of the previous suit was not denied by the defendant. The trial Court after hearing counsel for the parties found no merit in the application filed by the petitioner for leading additional evidence … IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision 636 of 2012 Date of Decision : December 05, 2012 Sham Lal ....Petitioner Versus Raj Kumar .....Respondent CORAM
“after Hearing the Learned Counsel for the Parties and Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
the Punjab State Education Department was not issued any notice and has not been granted any opportunity of hearing prior to taking a decision as regards denial of pay and allowances for the period he had remained … petitioner has been denied full pay and allowances for the period 12.08.2006 to 27.11.2008 i.e.the period he had remained under suspension. Counsel submits that the petitioner who is serving as a Punjabi Master under the Punjab State
“after Hearing the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Vs. State of P ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
1992 -3- 4. While issuing notice of motion, the Division Bench passed the following order on 29.07.1992: “After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and having gone through the detailed orders passed by the original as … was that the petitioner was not having the qualifications for appointment as per the provisions of Section 115 read with Section 34 of the Punjab Panchayat Samitis & Zila Parishad Act, 1961 read with Rule 3 of
“after Hearing the Counsel for the Parties This Court Is of Consider ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
present petition, invoking the superintendence jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable help and after deep consideration … Civil Revision No.4125 of 2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4125
“after Hearing the Rival Contentions of Both the Learned Counsel for ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-25-2014
revision petitions, invoking the superintendence jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through Arvind Kumar Sharma 2014.03.04 10:41 I attest to the accuracy … Civil Revision Nos.2589 & 2598 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH1 Civil Revision
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free