Skip to content


Re Hearing - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: re hearing Page 1 of about 311 results (0.040 seconds)
1868

Ex Parte Bradley

Court: US Supreme Court

many of the courts of the states. Among the more recent are three cases in California, [ Footnote 17 ] in and independent court, invested with all the criminal jurisdiction, to hear and punish crimes and offenses within the district. And hence

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1871

Ex Parte Newman

Court: US Supreme Court

between the crews and captains of vessels" belonging to their respective countries, and the consul of Prussia, coming into the district filed by the claimant, and the district court upon further hearing reduced the amount to seven hundred and twelve dollars and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1873

Ex Parte Lange

Court: US Supreme Court

error if it was apparent on the face of the record. Page 85 U. S. 195 Accordingly, it was held there when the two district judges sat with him on the hearing, and the writ was discharged and the petitioner remanded to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 1883 (FN)

Ex Parte Wall

Court: US Supreme Court

were irregular and not in pursuance of the statute, which required regular charges to be exhibited, verified by affidavit, and a you a judge to affirm my guilt, in advance of hearing, upon street rumors? I decline to answer you at all,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 12 1888 (FN)

Ex Parte Terry

Court: US Supreme Court

mitigation, and, the fact being thus judicially established, it only remained for the judicial arm to inflict proper punishment." It is a question not necessary to be considered on the present hearing. The application for the writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 1908 (FN)

Ex Parte Young

Court: US Supreme Court

all its laws, and the latter, as Attorney General, might represent the State in litigation involving the enforcement of its statutes. to the same effect. Various affidavits were received upon the hearing before the court prior to the granting of the temporary

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 15 1911 (FN)

Ex Parte Metropolitan Water Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

the enforcement, operation, or execution of a state statute by restraining the action of any officer of the state, are stated a result of their application, it imperatively follows that the hearing and determination of the request for a temporary injunction should

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 1911 (FN)

Ex Parte Harding

Court: US Supreme Court

was, as alleged in the amended petition, a citizen and resident of the State of Illinois, expressly refused the prayer for order of this Court. . . ." The request for hearing was granted. A large amount of evidence was introduced on

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 16 1913 (FN)

Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co. and Seaman

Court: US Supreme Court

Chatfield or referred to a commissioner to take proof and report. Finally, on March 15, 1912, Judge Chatfield filed an opinion under 21 of the Judicial Code to prevent further hearing of the case by Judge Chatfield. That affidavit in substance

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 1914 (FN)

Ex Parte Roe

Court: US Supreme Court

remand. Ex Parte Hoard, 105 U. S. 578 ; In re Pollitz, 206 U. S. 323 ; Ex Parte Nebraska, 209 291, c. 143), and therefore was not removable. After a hearing, the motion was denied for reasons assigned in the second

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //