Skip to content


Re Extent - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: re extent Page 1 of about 8 results (0.024 seconds)
Sep 13 2013 (HC)

That Issue of Paddy to Be Limited to the Extent of Costs of Vs. Food C ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

virtually breach of contract contacted by petitioner and not by respondent No.1. So finding recorded by Arbitrator based on proper appreciation was decided that the respondent shall lift paddy to the extent of 2000 Metric Tonnes upto 30.3.1997, for the milling purposes.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 1993 (HC)

In Re: Scope and Extent of Applicability of Flag Code and Use of Natio ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1994All10

the Hon'ble Judges of this Court. In fact, if this reasoning is accepted then ministers should also not use National Flag consider it necessary or advisable.'5. The above provision, to the extent that it omits puisne judges of the High Courts from

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 2003 (HC)

U. Venkateswara Rao Vs. National Institute of Small Industries Extenti ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(4)ALD295

is the further case of the petitioner that the 2nd respondent is not eligible to participate in the tender as he

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 29 2012 (HC)

Muktiyar Son of Mohiddin. Vs. State by New Extention (N.E.)

Court: Karnataka

1. The petitioner is accused in Crime No.239/2005 registered toy New Extension police, Tumkur for the offence punishable under

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 05 2015 (HC)

In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...

Court: Delhi

of the transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record. 16. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. share capital for implementing the terms of Scheme, to the extent necessary. The Assistant Registrar of Companies also pointed out that

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2015 (HC)

In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...

Court: Delhi

the Companies Act, 1956 on 26th June, 2008 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana at New Delhi.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2015 (HC)

In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...

Court: Delhi

of the transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record. The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 02 2015 (HC)

In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...

Court: Delhi

Scheme of Amalgamation. Their consents/no objections have been placed on record. They have been examined and found in order. In view

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //