Re Extent - Judgment Search Results
Muktiyar Son of Mohiddin. Vs. State by New Extention (N.E.)
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-29-2012
1. The petitioner is accused in Crime No.239/2005 registered toy New Extension police, Tumkur for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 read with 34 of
That Issue of Paddy to Be Limited to the Extent of Costs of Vs. Food C ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-13-2013
with the respondent, for milling the paddy. It was decided that the respondent shall lift paddy to the extent of 2000 Metric Tonnes upto 30.3.1997, for the milling purposes. Relevant clause of the agreement to reads thus … CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh, Judge Present:- Mr.Hari Pal Verma, Advocate, for the appellant Mr.Rajinder Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.1 --- Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) Food Corporation of India (FCI) has filed this appeal to lay challenge
U. Venkateswara Rao Vs. National Institute of Small Industries Extenti ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-02-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD295
ORDERGulam Mohammed, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:'For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in accompanying affidavit it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may
18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Scope and Extent of Applicability of Flag Code and Use of Natio ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-31-1993
Reported in: AIR1994All10
the National Flag on their cars, whenever they consider it necessary or advisable.'5. The above provision, to the extent that it omits puisne judges of the High Courts from the list of authorities entitled to carry the … what has been stated above, prima facie, we are of the opinion that it is a case which requires consideration by this Courtand accordingly we direct the Registrar of this Court for registering this petition as a
In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2015
of the Companies Act, 1956 by the applicant companies seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors to consider and approve, with or
In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2015
1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Sharp Capital Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company) with Sharp Credits Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee company). 2. The
In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2015
of the Companies Act, 1956 by the applicant companies seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors to consider and approve, with or
In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2015
company and further increase/modification in the latter's authorized share capital for implementing the terms of Scheme, to the extent necessary. The Assistant Registrar of Companies also pointed out that the petitioners are obliged to effect appropriate increase … by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Apex Safety Glass Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company No. 1), Narang Academic Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free