Re Examination - Judgment Search Results

Hira Nath Singh and ors. Vs. Bihar School Examination Board and anr.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2008(56)BLJR450; [2008(1)JCR186(Jhr)]

the learned Single Judge directed to Board to publish the result of those students who completed their studies for the sessions eligible, were allowed to appear in the Primary Teachers' Training Examination held in August, 1994 by the Bihar School Examination Board,

Shiwajee Pandey, Examiner Iii, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

the exercises carried out have been given in the counter reply filed specially with the help of Annexure R-1 order dated rules have been modified; so as to prescribe that an Examiner was not to get the position of Supervisory Examiner hereafter.

Controller of Examinations, Utkal University Vs. Paurnamasi Das (Ms)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 81(1996)CLT18(SC); 1995(5)SCALE497; (1995)6SCC81; [1995]Supp3SCR771

honours student in the final degree examination. In 1993, the respondent appeared in the final degree examination. She obtained 176 marks the pre-degree examination plus 400 marks in the final degree examination, the total maximum marks would be 800 and, therefore, she

Professional Examination Board and anr. Vs. Prashant Agrawal and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2002(8)SC84; (2003)1UPLBEC176

examination in the first place. According to the appellants the regulations of the MCI as well as the rules of the on the ground that he was disqualified from taking the examination.11. Rule 2.5.3. is relevant in this context. It provides :'The

Examining Bd. Vs. Flores De Otero

Court: US Supreme Court

benefits or partake Page 426 U. S. 605 of public resources on the same basis as citizens. In each case, the appellee Perez reads in part: "That the approval of this examination grants him the right to practice ENGINEERING solely and exclusively

Controller of Examination, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examina ...

Court: Patna

ignore Clause 14.4 of the prospectus was taken after the results of the 1999 examination had been published,. The clause had be given on the basis of the results of 10+2 examinations, the same method cannot subsequently be altered. It was held:The

Controller of Examinations and ors. Vs. G.S. Sunder and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1992(4)SC204; 1993(1)SCALE604; 1993Supp(3)SCC82

General is agreeable to the course proposed to the first respondent in relation to the reduction of the period of debarment. his client was ready and willing to take the concerned examinations in the ensuing semester, afresh. Hence, the period of debarment

Bihar School Examination Board Vs. Suresh Prasad Sinha

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2010SC93; 2009(6)ALT43; 2009(4)AWC3593(SC); 2009(57)BLJR3079; JT2009(11)SC541; 2010(1)MhLJ882(SC); (2009)8MLJ1306(SC); RLW2010(1)SC682; 2009(12)SCALE228; (2009)8SCC483;

a person in pursuance of a contract or otherwise in relation to any service.According to the definition of 'consumer' in Section this issue. In some cases, it has been held that Examination Boards do not come within the purview of the Act.

Commissioner of Examinations, Higher Secondary Directorate Vs. G.R. Ar ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2004Ker269

Part II -- Computer Information Technology (Theory), only 5 marks remain. Even if those 5 marks are given, the writ petitioner that the petitioner could not write the 'Save A Year' examination on account of the confusion in the grant of moderation

Board of Examiners of the Pleader-ship and Moktearship Examinations Vs ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 18Ind.Cas.527

right and none other and that his claim has been refused.' There has been no regard to these principles in this successful candidates'--that is, from the list of candidates at the examination at which he committed the wrong and fraudulent act which