Re Erection - Judgment Search Results

Building Union Vs. Ledbetter Erection Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Building Union v. Ledbetter Erection Co., Inc. - 344 U.S. 178 (1952) U.S. Supreme Court Building Union v. Ledbetter Erection Co., Inc., 344 … November 13, 1952 Decided December 8, 1952 344 U.S. 178 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA Syllabus Respondent filed a bill in equity in an Alabama state court to enjoin certain picketing activities, wholly peaceful, carried

Executive Engineer, Penstock Fabrication and Erection Division, Cuddap ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)ALD516; (2002)IIILLJ1AP

11-5-1982 extending the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.242, dated 1-6-1977 to the direct recruits working in the Penstock Fabrication and Erection Division, Cuddapah.2. The facts leading to the filing of MP No.77 of 1982 before the Labour Court can … S.R. Nayak, J.1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Secretary, Irrigation and Power Department and other authorities in the said department have filed this writ

Dashrath Rajaram Solanke and Others Vs. the Executive Engineer, Chief ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

have questioned the judgment dated 15.10.1997 delivered by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 2618/1997 since reported at 1998(3) Mah.L.J. 897 (Executive Engineer vs. Ananta and Others). They were the respondents in the said petition.

Dattatraya Shankarrao Kharde and ors. Vs. Executive Engineer, Chief Ga ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1994)ILLJ395Bom; 1994(1)MhLj776

working as Helpers in the Irrigation Department of the State Government under the control and management of the respondents. By order dated August 30, 1984 their services were terminated with effect from August 31, 1984. Ny filling

Owen Eqpt. and Erection Co. Vs. Kroger

Court: US Supreme Court

Owen Eqpt. & Erection Co. v. Kroger - 437 U.S. 365 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Owen Eqpt. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, … 21, 1978 437 U.S. 365 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Respondent, a citizen of Iowa, sued for damages based on the wrongful death of her husband, who was electrocuted