Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: re entry permit Court: madhya pradesh Page 3 of about 5,652 results (0.078 seconds)

Delite Talkies Vs. the City of Jabalpur Corporation

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1966MP298

..... repelling the attack, the supreme court first pointed out that there was no reason to construe the words 'taxes on luxuries or entertainments or amusements' in entry 50 of list 2 of schedule 7 to the government of india act, 1935, as having a restricted, meaning so as to confine the operation of the law to be made thereunder only to taxes on persons receiving the luxuries, entertainments, or amusements. ..... thirdly, it is urged that the tax levied by the corporation is with respect to ' professions, trades, callings and employments' enumerated in entry 60 of list ii of the seventh schedule to the constitution, and the amount of tax which the corporation can recover cannot exceed the amount permitted by article 276(2) of the constitution. ..... in our opinion, therefore, section 73 is a law with respect to matters enumerated in entry 50 and not entry 46 and the bombay legislature had ample power to enact this law. ..... it is true that economists regard an entertainment tax as a tax on expenditure and, indeed, when the tax is imposed on the receiver of the entertainment, there is no warrant for holding that entry 50 contemplates only a tax on moneys spent on luxuries, entertainments or amusements. ..... then it was observed that-'the entry contemplates luxuries, entertainments, and amusements as objects on which the tax is to be imposed. .....

M/S Divhya Marble Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... registrar accompanied by the prescribed fee specifying the alteration which is signed and verified in the manner required under section 58 and the registrar on being 8 w.p no.11556/2006 satisfied shall amend the entry and shall file it alongwith the statement relating to the firm filed under section 59.9. from a perusal of sections 58, 59, 60 and the statement of objects and reasons for amending section 58 ..... petition being aggrieved by order dated 28.8.2004 passed by the assistant registrar, firms and societies, jabalpur division, jabalpur, whereby the application, filed by the petitioner seeking amendment of the entries in the register regarding principal place of business, has been rejected on the ground that the principal place of business of the petitioner is situated beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the ..... under section 60 of the act, which provides for applying to the registrar bringing to his notice the alteration in the location of business requesting him to change the entries made in respect of the principal place of business recorded under section 58(1)(b) of the act, which has wrongly been rejected by the authority on the ground of territorial jurisdiction.4. ..... that the act does not restrict or limit the power of the registrar to make an entry in the register only in respect of firms whose principal place of business is within his territorial jurisdiction but permits registration of firms at any of its place of business and in such circumstances the impugned order .....

Smt.Kamla Singh. Vs. Smt. Alka Singh, and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... merely after deletion of entry, the appellant may get a benefit in respect of allotment of the retail outlet will not be a ground to permit the appellant to file this appeal ..... land revenue code, 1959 for exercising such power, one under section 50 which provides exercise of suo motu revision power by the collector and another is section 115 which provides correction of wrong entry in khasra and any other land records by superior officers. ..... in view of aforesaid, it is apparent that the entries, if any, were in the revenue record prior to 1985 and after a period of more than 16 years, such power could not have been exercised ..... government advocate fairly conceded that the collector did not issue any notice to the persons interested in the lands before directing the deletion of name of baldev from the revenue papers and restoring the entry in favour of the state of madhya pradesh. ..... proper enquiry was apparently made regarding baldev and merely because his address was not mentioned in the khasra paper, it was improper on the part of collector to suspect the entries made in their names as forged. ..... in this case, the entries were effected much before coming into force of the ..... collector after recording such finding rightly directed for correction of entry in the revenue record. ..... that the entries in the revenue record were recorded much before coming into force of m.p.land revenue code, 1959 on 1.10.1959 and after long lapse of time, the collector was not having any power even under section 50 .....

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Rameshwar Prasad

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1983MP59

..... being pointed out by the opposite party it reveals that the extension of time was sought or false-pretences holding that it would be inequitable to allow taking advantage of one's own fraud, the respondent was thus permitted to raise an objection when the time for making good the deficit court-fee was granted in his absence and he was heard to say that extension was sought on false pretences. ..... only a declaratory decree, when the matter came up for hearing before the high court, the opposite party objected to the maintainability of the appeal and the high court then permitted the appellant to withdraw the amendment earlier made and granted the appellant time to make good the deficit court-fee. ..... before, however, such copies can be tendered and accepted as a proof of such entries, a certificate by the officer having custody of the records or other documents under his signature and stating that it is a true copy of the original entries and that such original entries are contained in the records or other documents of the railway administration in his possession, has to be appended to that copy, this copy of ..... that section 139 of the railways act permits proof of entries in records or other documents of railway administration by production of a copy of such entries. ..... the division bench of the high court observed while permitting the amendment that the appellant was doing so at his own risk, the registrar then held that as the memo then stood, court-fee was properly paid on the footing .....

Shanti Swaroop Sharma Vs. Abdul Rehman Farooqui

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1965MP55

..... candidate and his proposer as entered in the nomination paper are the same as those entered in the electoral rolls: provided that the returning officer shall permit any clerical or technical error in the nomination paper in regard to the said names or numbers to be corrected in order to bring them into conformity with the corresponding ..... we are of the view that, apart from the questions of age and of the disqualifications mentioned in section 16 of the 1950 act, the entry is conclusive evidence of the person referred to in the entry being an elector eligible for contesting the election in the constituency and it cannot be allowed to be rebutted by showing that his name was, in disregard to section 17 of the 1950 act ..... the matter is covered by section 36(7) of the act which reads :'for the purposes of this section, a certified copy of any entry in the electoral roll for the time being in force of a constituency shall be conclusive evidence of the fact that the person referred to in that entry is an elector for that constituency, unless it is proved that he is subject to a disqualification mentioned in section 16 of the representation ..... numbers of the candidate and the proposer as entered in the nomination paper agree with those entered in the relevant electoral roll and empowers him to permit any clerical or technical errors in the nomination paper about the said names and number to be corrected so as to bring them in conformity with the corresponding entries in the electoral rolls. .....

Firoz MeharuddIn Vs. Sub-divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961MP110; 1961CriLJ516

..... territory of india to the territory now included in pakistan after the first day of march 1947.this fiction, however, shall not operate if that person having so migrated to pakistan returns to india with a permit for resettlement or permanent return issued by the appropriate authority, in which case he shall be in the category of persons who have migrated to india from pakistan on or after the nineteenth day of july ..... to be a citizen of india: provided that nothing in this article shall apply to a person who, after having so migrated to the territory now included in pakistan has returned to the territory of india under a permit for resettlement or permanent return issued by or under the authority of any law and every such person shall for the purposes of clause (b) of article 6 be deemed to have migrated to the territory o india after the ..... question with regard to the status of such persons who had sougat shelter in india either before 19-7-1948 or after 19-7-1948 on the basis of permits was under consideration and it was decided to amalgamate them into the indian people and confer upon them the status of indian citizens.question with regard to ..... proviso to article 7 further provided that if a person who had migrated to pakistan returned to the territory of india under a permit for resettlement or permanent return issued by or under the authority of law, he shall be deemed to have migrated to india after 19th july, 1948 ..... entry and exit from and to india was regulated first by permits .....

N.L. Lilhare Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... the justification given by the respondents for permitting the entry to remain for 27 years cannot be accepted ..... even before this court the justification for changing the entry, respondents have only stated that the entry has been corrected on the basis of an affidavit submitted by the petitioner and certain documents produced by the police authorities, this assertions of the respondents, prima-facie 8 seems ..... he had attained the age of superannuation as per the date of birth being 14.8.1940, the same was ignored and taking note of the date of birth as 19.10.1942, he was permitted to work upto 30.5.2002 when all of a sudden, the impugned action is taken.5. ..... of the employee is opened, sealed and entries made every year for various purposes, when pay fixation is done and when various other service benefits are to be granted, entries are made in the service book and in the normal circumstances, if not, more than atleast on two to three occasions every year, the service book of the employee is opened and certain entries are made by the competent authority. ..... accordingly, entries made in column-5 of the service book in the year 1963 was corrected and treating the date of birth to be 19.10.1942, petitioner was permitted to work beyond 31 st of ..... was not detected and the employee was given the benefit of the entry made in the service book till the year 2002, i.e. ..... shown as to what was the error committed by the said authority and why this illegality was permitted to remain for 27 years.12. .....

Municipal Council, Satna Vs. Birla Jute Manufacturing Company Ltd., Sa ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1983MP161

..... the adhiniyam is a law falling under list ii entry 49 of the constitution which permits the legislature to impose taxes on lands and buildings. ..... we cannot, therefore, now permit the respondent company to raise that point and to contend that section 5 (ii) was not attracted, in any case, under these circumstances, the omission to record the opinion by the property-tax officer under the proviso to ..... it cannot, therefore, be said that the legislature has gone beyond its taxing power under entry 49 of list ii. .....

Ramprasad Ambaram Verma Vs. President, Industrial Court and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1991)IILLJ488MP; 1989MPLJ797

..... in such circumstances, we feel that the punishment of termination of the employment was too harsh, as it has been held by a series of decisions of this court that when an employee commits an act of dereliction in his duties and permitted the passengers to board the bust before issuing tickets to them and did not make entries in the trip sheet or collection sheet, dishonesty, in such circumstances, cannot be inferred. ..... as the object of industrial adjudication is to put to an end the industrial dispute as early as possible, by permitting the employer to prove before the labour court that the termination is justified on the ground of misconduct, the industrial dispute is brought to an end and the employee is given the benefit of an independent adjudication by the labour court ..... it is not disputed that the petitioner has not misappropriated the amount and has deposited the same and entry of 14 tickets has been made in the additional collection sheet. ..... therefore, he is now estopped from saying that the corporation was wrongly permitted to adduce evidence. .....

B.P. Ram S/O K.D. Ram and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ145

..... a chowkidar is posted on the gate of the swimming pool, who permits the entry on presentation of the admission card.3. ..... had the chowkidar seen him entering into the premises, he would not have permitted his entry. ..... the chowkidar could not have the knowledge of his entry into the swimming pool. ..... entry into the pool is restricted to the members and their dependents. .....