Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: re entry permit Court: madhya pradesh Page 11 of about 5,652 results (0.092 seconds)

State of M.P. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(2)MPLJ249

..... labh chand, it is held that :-'when a statutory forum or tribunal is specially created by a statute for redressal of specified grievances of persons on certain matters, the high court should not normally permit such persons to ventilate their specified grievances before it by entertaining petitions under article 226 of the constitution is a legal position which is too well settled'. -x- -x- -x-21. ..... motor yan karadhan adhiniyam, 1991 (for short adhiniyam') on the fulcrum of non-possession of valid permit, as required under section 66 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (for short 'the act') and non-payment of tax leviable under the act, on supratnama of 9 lakhs, supported by surety of equal value, on specified conditions, discordant sound in ..... the 'adhiniyam' and 'rules' are self-contained code and do not permit recourse to 'other law like the code of criminal procedure' for release of vehicle.13. ..... seventh schedule containing these lists, shows that entry 56 and 57 pertain to such taxes and are in the 'state list'. ..... procedure regarding entry and search. ..... to permit recourse to ection 451 or 457 of the code before a criminal court would occasion an alteration of the material of which the adhiniyam is woven which is impermissible. .....

State Bank of India Officers' Association and Ors. Vs. State Bank of I ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1982)IILLJ363MP

..... the petitioners have tried to contend that the state bank did not permit them to be present at the time of the scrutiny by the claims department. ..... the petitioner's grievance that though they had been required by the reserve bank of india to be present at the time of scrutiny, but the state bank did not permit them, is wholly unfounded.11. .....

Laxmidas Patel Vs. the Indore Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1975MP223

..... if the state has decided to permit imposition of a tax under entry 49, list ii for raising funds to provide relief to destitutes, it cannot be argued that the state should have also legislated for imposition of taxes permitted under other entries for the same purpose. ..... the cess permitted by the act is a tax on lands and buildings (entry 49, list ii) which a local auhority can impose for raising funds for providing relief to destitutes. ..... under this entry owners of other properties cannot be taxed at all. ..... the cess imposed is a tax on lands and buildings under entry 49, list ii. ..... the state has power to legislate for the relief of the disabled and unemploy-ables; (entry 9, list ii). .....

S.S. Koshal, Ex-officer, Junior Management, Sbi and ors. Vs. State Ban ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ525MP; 1992(0)MPLJ307

..... the enquiry officer accepted the explanation of the petitioner that the said withdrawal was permitted as the customer was a known party and was also a borrower from the bank. ..... the enquiry officer came to the conclusion that since there were credit entries made the same day in the accounts books in mohgaon branch by the petitioner, inference of undue favour shown by the petitioner can reasonably be drawn.11. ..... the gist of defence of the petitioner was that all these withdrawals were permitted on telephonic confirmation from the issuing branch at malajkhand and in any case, it caused no loss to the bank.9. ..... with regard to the entries made in the account books of the bank for such withdrawals, his explanation was that on the basis of the telephonic confirmation, he expected that such entries must have been made by the branch manager, malajkhand branch so as to allow him to make corresponding entries in accounts books of his branch at mohgaon.8. ..... 5 against the petitioner was that he permitted withdrawal from the saving bank account of one kundaram baiga of rs. ..... petitioner's explanation to the charge was that the issuing branch was the state bank of india, malajkhand and after telephonic confirmation regarding the cheques, the credits were made and the withdrawals were permitted. .....

Pramod Kumar Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

heard on this first application for bail under section 439 of the cr.p.c filed on behalf of the applicants pramod and shaikhar in crime no.287/2015 registered by p.s. mungwani, district-narsinghpur for offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 354, 354-a read with section 34 of the ipc and section 8 of protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012. as per the prosecution case, the prosecutrix, who is 15 years of age, was going alone to answer call of nature at about 5:30 a.m behind the high school. she was intercepted by accused persons pramod and shaikhar. shaikhar said that he liked her and pramod picked her up and they were taking her away. when the prosecutrix raised an alarm, her aunt who was passing by, reached the spot. at the same time, the watchman of the school also reached the spot, thereafter, the applicants escaped from the spot. it has been submitted on behalf of the applicants that the charge-sheet in the case has been filed. the applicants have been in custody since 17.11.2015. learned counsel for the applicants has also filed copy of the judgment dated 28.09.2015 delivered by jmfc, narsinghpur, in criminal case no.351/2013 to show that the applicants have been falsely implicated due to enmity. learned government advocate for the respondent/state has opposed the bail application. keeping in view, the facts and circumstances of the case in their entirety, particularly the nature of offence, the fact that charge-sheet has been filed and applicants .....

Pramod JaIn @ Pinki Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

1 criminal appeal no.1603 of 2007 high court of madhya pradesh at jabalpur single bench: hon ble shri justice subhash kakade criminal appeal no.1603 of 2007 appellant: pramod jain @ pinki s/o hukumchand jain, aged 22 years, r/o village siyermau, p.s. silwani, district raisen (m.p.). versus respondent: state of madhya pradesh, through p.s. silwani, district raisen (m.p.). --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- shri a.d. mishra, advocate for the appellant. smt. nirmala nayak, govt. advocate for the respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- date of hearing :14. 05.2013 date of judgment:08. 07.2013 (judgment) appellant pramod jain @ pinki has filed this appeal under section 374 of criminal procedure code, 1973 being aggrieved by the judgment dated 18/07/2007 passed by learned additional district judge (fast track court) begumganj, district raisen in sessions trial no.116/2006 (state of m.p. through p.s. silwani, district raisen vs pramod jain @ pinki), whereby, the appellant convicted under section 436 of ipc and sentenced for one year's rigorous imprisonment and fine of rs.1000/-, failing which the appellant to suffer three months' rigorous imprisonment separately. 02. to appreciate the say of the appellant, i would like to say that basic case was that complainant akshay kumar owing one gumti situated at bus stand, siyermua, p.s. silwani, district .....

Vijay Bajaj Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh through Principal Secretary, T ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... (7) accordingly, by quashing both the orders assailed herein, the matter is remitted back to the respondent no.2/rta to pass a fresh order in regard to grant of permit to the respondent no.3 which would be confined to a single route by re-fixing the time schedule in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all affected ..... tribunal and others) it was held by this court vide order dated 11/3/14 as under:- rule 72(3) (b) of the madhya pradesh motor vehicles rules, 1994 (hereinafter referred rules of 1994) prescribes that an application of stage carriage permit shall be accompanied by certain documents and one of the condition is of certificate of registering authority in regard to ownership of vehicle of the applicant. ..... (2) on going through the pleadings and averments, it emerges that the petitioner is a holder of regular stage carriage permit bearing no.14/damoh/2005-06 on hatta to jabalpur via bangaon damoh abhana, taijghar tandukheda pandajhir patan nunsar route for one trip which is valid up to 30th ..... submitted that the learned rto in the absence of having such materials and failure on the part of the respondent no.3 to comply with the conditions under the relevant provisions, the permit was granted in his favour vide annexure-p/3 which is valid up to 31/7/2018. ..... rules, 1994 and further to the notification dated 24/11/10 which prescribed the method for seeking requisite permit and production of necessary documents at the time of submission of the application. .....

Goyal and Sons and anr. Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samittee and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1998MP202; 1998(2)MPLJ282

..... counsel for the appellants tried to urge that in view of the amendment in section 2(1)(a) of the act deleting the words 'whether processed or not', occurring therein in the year, 1990, the whole purpose of issuance of permits or requirement of obtaining permits contemplated under section 19(6) of the act, stood nullified, and therefore, no such restriction which was necessary before the coming into force of the amendment could be imposed. 16. ..... was further pointed out that the paymentof the required market fee contemplated under the act cannot be presumed but the requirement of the permit or gate pass was only for the purpose that the due payment of market fee, as required under the act can be ..... contained in section19(6) of the act, only require that no notified agricultural produce nor any products processed therefrom shall be removed out of the market proper except in accordance with a permit issued by the market committee in such form as may be prescribed by the bye-laws. ..... it was further stated that the petitioners were not required to obtain second permit or gate pass which is required to be obtained only at the lime when any agricultural produce or any product processed therefrom is to be removed from the area of any market ..... *** (6) no notified agricultural produce nor any products processed therefrom shall be removed out of the market proper except in accordance with a permit issued by the market committee in such form as may be prescribed by bye-laws. *** *** ***13. .....

Pandit Ram Prasad Purohit Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and o ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ388

..... - section (3) of section 100 in respect of any notified area or notified route, the state transport authority or the regional transport authority, as the case may be, shall not grant any permit except in accordance with the provisions of the scheme.provided that where no application for a permit has been made by the state transport undertaking in respect of any notified area or notified route in pursuance of an approved scheme, the state transport authority, as the case may be, may ..... in the circumstances, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances as brought on record as well as those noticed hereinabove, this writ petition is disposed of finally providing that the applications seeking either the grant of a permanent permit for plying the stage carriage on the route in question or the temporary permit for the plying of the stage carriage on the route in question shall be considered by the respondent no. ..... in this connection, reliance has been placed on the notification issued by the sachiv, rajya parivahan pradhikar, madhya pradesh dated 1-3-1996, prescribing that all the applicants for temporary permits were required to annex along with their applications no due certificate in regard to the payment of the road-tax.10. .....

Krishnapal Singh Vs. Gulzar Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ1090

..... was delivered in a different context, yet the same can be treated to be applicable to the obtaining factual matrix of the present case inasmuch as there has been two violations, carrying passengers on a route in respect of which there was no permit and further the vehicle insured for the purpose of private use but was being used for commercial purpose. ..... the tribunal further came to hold that the owner had violated the conditions of the insurance policy as the policy was granted for the purpose of private use but the owner had taken permit to ply the vehicle on 'nagar vahan seva', i.e. ..... in addition, the permit was granted to ply the vehicle from tilwara to gaur nadi but the accident occurred on national highway, village bheda near sleemnabad. ..... the tribunal also expressed the view that the insurance company was not liable to indemnify the owner since the permit was issued for plying the vehicle from tilwara to gaur nadi but the accident took place at national highway near village bheda and, therefore, the jeep was being plied in contravention of the permit. ..... the permit was obtained from the rta to ply the vehicle from tilwara to gaur nadi as 'nagar vahan seva'. ..... thus, the route was not covered by the permit. ..... additionally a stand was taken that the vehicle in question had violated the conditions of the policy inasmuch as it was being plied without valid permit. .....