Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: re entry permit Court: madhya pradesh Page 9 of about 5,652 results (0.091 seconds)

Netram Vs. Lakshman Prasad and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960MP368

..... rule 2(1)(b) of the respresentation of the people (conduct of elections and election petitions) rules, 1956, defines 'electoral roll number' of a person as meaning-(i) the serial number of the entry in the electoral roll in respect of that person; (ii) the serial number of the part of the electoral roll in which such entry occurs; and (iii) the name of the constituency to which the electoral roll relates. ..... it is true that under the proviso to section 33(4) of the act, he is required to permit any clerical or technical error in the nomination papers in regard to the names or the electoral roll numbers of the candidates or their proposers to be corrected in order to bring them into conformity with the corresponding entries in the electoral rolls; and where necessary, to direct that any clerical or printing error in the said entries shall be overlooked. ..... (iii) the serial number of the entry in thatpart:-- (the entry is blank).the question is whether the information given inthese nomination papers was sufficient and did notjustify their rejection. 6. ..... but this presupposes that the entries give the information necessary to find out the part of the electoral roll in which their names appear and to trace out either their names or electoral roll numbers. ..... the relative importance of these entries will appear from the following discussion. 7. ..... the entries made there by v. r. .....

Janggu @ Shobhit S/O Sunder Sai Rajwar and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2000CriLJ711; 1999(2)MPLJ474

..... the moment property was sold to the complainant, the said complainant was entitled to possession and as he entered in possession and was enjoying his rights over the land and as the accused persons did not permit him to harvest the paddy crop, the court below was absolutely justified in convicting the accused. ..... unless it is proved by the prosecution that the complainant had a right and was enjoying the same, the prosecution would not be entitled to say that because accused did not permit the complainant to take possession of the property which he was allegedly entitled he be convicted.11. p.w. ..... the said khasra entry shows that land was recorded in name of sindhu s/o maniram gond in the year 1992-93. ..... 1 is conspicuously silent regarding delivery of possession or his entry in the property. ..... ex.p.7 is the khasra entries for the years 1992-93, 93-94 and 94-95. ..... there is no entry in column no. .....

Janggu @ Shobhit and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(1)MPHT281

..... the moment property was sold to the complainant, the said complainant was entitled to possession and as he entered in possession and was enjoying his rights over the land and as the accused persons did not permit him to harvest the paddy crop, the court below was absolutely justified in convicting the accused. ..... unless it is proved by the prosecution that the complainant had a right and was enjoying the same, the prosecution would not be entitled to say that because accused did not permit the complainant to take possession of the property which he was allegedly entitled he be convicted.11. p. w. ..... the said khasra entry shows that land was recorded in name of sindhu s/o maniram gond in the year 1992-93. ..... 1 is conspicuously silent regarding delivery of possession or his entry in the property. ..... p/7 is the khasra entries for the years 1992-93, 93-94 and 94-95. ..... there is no entry in column no. .....

Shankerlal Raikwar Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(2)MPHT193

..... whether a particular caste or a tribe is scheduled caste or scheduled tribe as the case may be, within the meaning of the entries contained in the presidential orders issued under article 341(1) or 342(1) is to be determined looking into them as they are. ..... governments nor the courts nor tribunals nor any authority can assume jurisdiction to hold inquiry and take evidence to declare that a caste or a tribe or part of or a group within a caste or tribe is included in presidential orders in one entry or the other, although they are not expressly and specifically included.7. ..... as apex court has held that courts cannot and should not expand jurisdiction to deal with the question as to whether a particular caste, sub-caste; a group or part of tribe or sub-tribe is included in any one of the entries mentioned in the presidential orders issued under articles 341 or 342. ..... such certificate cannot include petitioner within scope of entry as sub-caste cannot be included nor synonym can be found.9. ..... articles 341(1) or 342(1) do not permit any one to seek modification of the said orders by leading evidence that the caste/tribe (a) alone is mentioned in the order but caste/tribe (b) is also a part of caste/tribe (a) and as such caste/ tribe (b) should be deemed to be a ..... this question whether scope of an entry made in presidential notification can be expanded by including synonymous or sub-castes, is considered by the supreme court in state of maharashtra v. .....

Gwalior Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ868

..... if that view is not taken, it would permit a civil court to usurp the jurisdiction of the tribunal and render otiose the provisions of sections 26 and 41. ..... clearly, therefore, the other permitted user of the siding could have similar grievance in respect of which complaint could be entertained by the tribunal. ..... in the same column, there is another entry that 'the gwalior agriculture co. ..... , have been permitted to use this siding on payment of the siding charges shown in item (i) above'. ..... that entry is in the book published by the central railway as 'supplementary goods tariff no. 2'. .....

Commissioner Sales Tax, M.P. Vs. M/s Gajanand Oil Mill, Khargone J ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... that means that although the petitioner would otherwise have been liable to pay entry tax under the provisions of that act @ 2.5%, it is by virtue of the special notification issued by the state 3 s.t.r.no :: 55 / 1999 commissioner of sales tax, mp versus m/s gajanan oil mill, khargone government granting such an exemption to a class of dealers to which the ..... that would, in effect, be depriving a person otherwise entitled to the benefit of section 10 of the entry tax act setting at nought the effect of the exemption under section 10 if it were made liable to pay at the full rate to which otherwise it would have been liable to pay but for the exemption. ..... since the liability to pay entry tax was by virtue of the provisions of that act and that the amount, namely 2.5% was exempted by virtue of the notification issued u/s 12 of the sales tax act, a copy whereof has been marked as annexure c , the only ..... it is a matter of no consequence that the petitioner had not to pay actually by virtue of the exemption granted u/s 10 of the entry tax act any amount by way of entry tax. ..... one cannot visualize any contingency in which such a provision for exemption is made by virtue of the special power vested in the state government under section 10 of the entry tax act. ..... the benefit has been allowed on the set off mainly on the ground that the notification issued granting exemption which was applicable to the dealer permits so. .....

Ram Pramod Kacchi Vs. Gayadeen and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT493

..... it is contended that the finding aforesaid arrived at by the first appellate court is contrary to evidence on record and in any case, if necessary plaintiff/appellant must have been permitted to amend the plaint seeking relief of possession.exhibit p-1, khasra entry for the year 1974-75 goes to show that plaintiff/appellant rampramod was the recorded owner in possession of suit land khasra no. .....

Smt Ullan Bai Loniya Vs. Smt Prema Devi Loniya

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... prema devi and found that she is in requirement of some amount for her treatment and has permitted to sell some portion of the land after being satisfied that she is in possession of the said land. ..... learned counsel invites my attention to the khasr.entries in this regard, available in annexure r/2 and the medical documents annexure r/1, to contend that a reasonable decision taken by the trial court and the discretion exercised does not call for any interference. ..... shri vivek rusia, learned counsel, invites my attention to the documents available and points out that undisputedly the portion permitted to be sold belongs to smt. ..... prema devi and others reasons given for permitting smt. .....

Raj Kumari and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1993ACJ846

..... (2) a railway servant granting the permission referred to in sub-section (1) shall ordinarily grant to the passenger a certificate that the passenger has been permitted to travel in such carriage upon condition that he subsequently pays the fare payable for the distance to be travelled.7. ..... the scheme and the act seen as a whole makes it evident that the entry into a railway carriage required of a person to obtain a ticket, pass or permission and in absence thereof, his action or omission is punishable with imprisonment or fine, including removal from the carriage. .....

M/S Ambey Enterprises Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... on 9.1.2009 the collector of the district permitted entry of the area to the petitioner. .....