Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: re entry permit Court: madhya pradesh Page 16 of about 5,652 results (0.092 seconds)

May 31 2001 (HC)

Vikas and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(2)MPHT341; 2001(3)MPLJ13

orderdipak misra, j. 1. in this revision preferred under section 401 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the code') the petitioners have called in question the legal validity of the order dated 11 -5-2001 passed by the second additional sessions judge, burhanpur, district khandwa in sessions trial no. 145/2000.2. the facts as have been unfurled are that sunita, sister of the applicant nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 and daughter of the applicant no. 2, was married to one pramod son of shambha ji. after solemnisation of the marriage, sunita went to her matrimonial home where she was ill-treated by her husband, father-in-law and other relations as a consequence of which she committed suicide on 1-8-2000. the investigating agency registered offences punishable under sections 498a/34 and 304b of the indian penat code (in short 'the ipc') against the husband, pramod, in-laws of the deceased and some other relations. it has been putforth in the petition that the applicants after receiving information relating to the death of sunita, reached her in-laws' house on 2-8-2000 at 9.30 a.m. as alleged by the prosecution the applicants made enquiry about the death of sunita and on not getting satisfactory reply they started beating her husband, pramod, and mother-in-law, ranjanabai, as a result of which she sustained certain injuries. the report of this incident was lodged by the husband, pramod which gave rise to a crime for offences under sections 307 and 147 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2012 (HC)

Arun Kumar Bhowmik Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

high court of madhya pradeesh jabalpur (writ petition no.482/2008) arun kumar bhowmick & others vs. union of india and others counsel for petitioners shri akash choudhary, advocate counsel for respondent union of india shri anoop nair, advocate (writ petition no.929/2008) s.r. chourasia and others vs. union of india and others counsel for petitioner shri kishore roy, advocate counsel for respondent union of india shri s.a. dharmadhikari, advocate (writ petition no.17536/2007) pradeep kumar bhowmick and others vs. union of india and others counsel for petitioner shri akash choudhary, advocate counsel for respondent union of india shri s.a. dharmadhikari, advocate present : honourable shri justice ajit singh honourable shri justice sanjay yadav o r d e r (26/06/2012) the following order of the court was delivered by sanjay yadav, j : this order shall govern final disposal of w.p. nos. 482/2008, 928/2008 and 17536/2007. these petitions are directed against a 2 w.p. no.428/2008 composite order passed by the central administrative tribunal, jabalpur bench, jabalpur in o.a. nos. 400/1998, 306/2000 and 423/2004; whereby, claim of the petitioners, chargeman grade ii, in the ordnance factories, under ordnance factory board, for grant of seniority over and above private respondents has been negatived. relevant facts are carved out from w.p. no. 482/2008.2. petitioners were initially appointed as supervisor in the pay scale of rs.380 560 under the third pay commission. subsequently, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1997 (HC)

Mitthanlal Mishra Vs. State Government of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1998MP67; 1997(2)MPLJ216

..... 5928, the said truck was in custody and possession of the driver gokul prasad who was required under the transit permit to transport certain forest wood from one place to another. ..... the return of the state states that the truck was loaded with fresh sawn timber which was not permitted under the transit pass. ..... in a raid effected on 4-12-1986 the forest ranger found the truck carrying some different fresh sawn forest produce and not the one under the permit or transit pass. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 1981 (HC)

Rajmal Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1982MP69

..... with the application or with modifications would have the effect of increasing the number of vehicles operating in the region, or in any are or on any route within the region, under the class of permits to which the application relates, beyond the limit fixed in that behalf under sub-section (3) of section 47 or sub-section (2) of section 55, as the case may be the regional transport authority may summarily refuse the application without ..... 416 of 1968 -- jabalpur -- decided on 27-9-1968), in support of the contention that underthe provisions of section 57 (8) of the act, though an application for extension of a permit was required to be treated as an application fop the grant of a new permit, yet the provisions of section 47 (3) of the act were not attracted while considering the question of grant of extension of a permit under the provisions of section 57(8) of the act learned counsel contended that the fiction created by sub-section (8) of section 57 of the act in treating an application ..... what is then the justification for holding that, when section 57 (8) of the act provides that an application to vary the condition of any permit by the inclusion of a new route or routes or a new area shall be treated as an application for the grant of a new permit, only the procedure laid down in section 57 of the act should apply to it and that section 47 (3) of the act will not be attracted to such an application(? .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1964 (HC)

Mohd. Ismail Noor Mohammad Vs. Fehmada Nahid and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1966CriLJ1094

..... connection with the disputed bus, it was from that point of view that the learned additional sessions judge modified the order of the trial magistrate that the order of returning the bus to the permit holders would be subject to compliance by them with the order of the sub-judge class delhi regarding appointment of a receiver.4. ..... this would give a free scope for playing of a fraud on the pait of a licence holder or a permit holder to somehow obtain possession of the property or tolmake the other party approach a civil court. ..... holding that any partnership agreement in lorry business involving a transfer of the permit would not be recognized by the court in view of the provisions of section 59(1) of the motor ..... laid down that the bus ought to be returned to the permit holder, particularly in view of the provisions of the motor vehicles act, ..... as the sixth respondent is a pardanashin woman and the other permit holders are all her daughters either major or minor, there was an arrangement between the sixth respondent purporting to act for herself and her minor daughters on the one hand and ..... this act of the petitioner amounted to a dispossession of the permit holder and the bus was actually seized from the possession of the petitioner by the police on 9.4.1964 at sehore where it had ..... that a distinction will also have to be made between cases where property generally is involved, and other cases where property involving a licence or a permit for its possession or use is required under law. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1996 (HC)

Vinod Kumar Sanghai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(2)MPLJ371

..... 3/7 of the essential commodities act, held that the offence under clause 3 of the order could not be limited to the person who deals with the levy cement, any person transporting or selling levy cement without permit enumerated under clause 10(2) is also included and may be proceeded against.12. ..... was not that of absence of material to frame charge, rather the question was that of prosecution of third party who had committed breach of transportation against the provisions of the aforesaid cement control order without any permit. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1965 (HC)

Narayanlal Jodhraj Singhal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1966MP199

..... the supreme court, after referring to section 57 (2) said :--' if it were held that immediately an application is made for a permit on a route which is the same as that for which applications are being considered by the transport authority under section 57 (5) or which might have a material bearing on the grant of permits on that route, the transport authority would have to hold its hand and wail till all the applications could be considered together, then it ..... would be apparent that if there are successive applications at intervals for these permits the stage might never be reached when the applications could be considered and ..... procedure that has to be followed by the regional transport authority when an application for the grant of a stage carriage permit is made and the procedure that is to be followed under the notaries rules, 1956, when an application for appointment of a notary is made under section 57 of the motor vehicles act, 1939, an application for a stage carriage permit has to be published in the gazette inviting representations and objections. ..... while dealing with the question of consideration of applications made under section 57 (2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939, for grant of stage carriage permits. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1967 (HC)

Sharangdhar Sharma Pathak Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ268MP

..... he made various representations to the government against his susperssesion and also sought permission to apply for posts outside the state; but the government did not appoint him in class i service and yet refused to permit him to apply for a post outside the state saying that his services could not be speared.3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2001 (HC)

Taxation Authority and anr. Vs. Parasmal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1(2002)ACC384

..... p1 and p2 and imposed additional tax on the respondent considering that the vehicles operated by the respondent under the permit issued by the transport authority from dhar to nisarpur and jobat to kukshi, should be considered 'pakka road' as the respondent operates his buses on the said road all around the year. ..... briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondent-plaintiff is a bus owner and has a permit to ply his buses from jobat to kukshi for a distance of 37 kms. ..... the plaintiff also has a permit to ply his other bus from nisarpur to dhar. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2013 (HC)

M/S Ideal Minerals Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2), but subject to the provisions of sub-section (1), the state government may, for any special reasons to be recorded, grant a reconnaissance permit, prospecting licence or mining lease, as the case may be, to an applicant whose application was received later in preference to an applicant whose application was received earlier:18. ..... in view of the aforesaid provisions, after recording the reasons the state government may grant permit, pl or ml as the case may be to the applicant whose application was received later in preference to an applicant whose application was received earlier. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //