Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Re Employed - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 22 2002

Employers in Relation to the Management of Flaritand Colliery of Bccl ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Mar-22-2002

Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1351; [2002(94)FLR644]; (2002)IIILLJ175Jhar

concerned workmen are the employees of the appellant and stone cutting jobs in which the concerned workmen were employed were of prohibited category of job. It has also been submitted that the award has reached its finality … I992(R) for quashing the award dated 21.2.1992 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Dhanbad in Reference Case No. 151/89.3. By Order No. L-20012(200)/84-D III(A)IR (Coal-1) dated 19.10.1989 the Central Government in the Ministry of


Jun 18 2003

Employers in Relation to the Management of Nirsa Area of Eastern Coalf ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-18-2003

Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1602; [2003(3)JCR189(Jhr)]

2047 of 1997(R) pleaded that all the 683 workmen as shown in the chart presented by them, were employed in Durga Boka Pahari Colliery, now a part of Badjna Colliery since before nationalization of coal mines in … dated 17th January, 1997 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Dhanbad in Reference No. 43/1990, whereby and whereunder, while he held the action of the Management of Badjna Colliery in denying


Sep 02 2003

Employers in Relation to the Management of Bhuli Township Administrati ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-02-2003

Reported in: 2003(3)BLJR2058; [2003(4)JCR34(Jhr)]; (2004)ILLJ554Jhar

19th December, 1995 in Reference Case No. 141/92 (old)/89/95 (new)'Whether Sh. Chandradeo Prasad Mandal and 65 other persons employed in Bhuli Township for repairing and maintenance of hand pump through a contractor are to be treated as … were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. On the basis of the following reference, the award in question was passed on 19th December, 1995 in Reference Case No. 141/92 (old)/89/95 (new)'Whether Sh.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 30 1973

Workmen of Calcutta Dock Labour Board and anr. Vs. Employers in Relati ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-30-1973

Reported in: AIR1973SC2251; [1973(26)FLR444]; (1973)IILLJ254SC; (1974)3SCC216; 1973(1)SLJ1044(SC)

made from the Office of the Dock Labour Board, the funds were obtained from the various Firms who employed the labour and the expenses of the board were met by a levy realised from such employers. Therefore, … is an appeal by special leave from an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta made in reference No. 124 of 1966.2. The facts may be shortly stated. The Calcutta Dock Labour Board is a body


Apr 06 2010

Sri Thammaiah S. S/O Siddaiah, Rtd. Visl Employer Vs. Sri Raju S/O A.K ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-06-2010

this writ petition has been filed.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits bat, both the documents do not relate to any agreement of sale between the parties.4. Article 5 Clause (e) of Schedule to Karnataka Stamp Act


Sep 07 2021

Employers In Relation To The Management Of Bhalgora Area (now Kustore ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-07-2021

to be held that respondents were guilty of misrepresentation and fraud perpetrated on the appellant employer while getting employed in Railway service and had Snatched such employment which would not have been made available to them if … SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2021(Arising out of SLP (C) No.29873 OF2016 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF BHALGORA AREA (NOW KUSTORE AREA) OF M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS WORKMEN


Aug 13 2025

Employer in Relation to Management of Katras Area of M/S Bharat Coking ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-13-2025

Reported in: [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1481

[2025] 8 S.C.R. 1481 : 2025 INSC 1011Employer in Relation to Management of Katras Area of M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad v. Workman-Shahdeo Das (Civil Appeal No.


Feb 22 2005

Employers, Mgmt., M. Colliery, Bccl Ltd. Vs. Bihar Colliery Kamgar Uni ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-22-2005

Reported in: AIR2005SC2006; 2005(1)BLJR502; [2005(104)FLR1224]; [2006(2)JCR151(SC)]; JT2005(2)SC444; (2005)ILLJ1135SC; (2005)3SCC331; (2005)2UPLBEC1102

made by the Central Industrial Tribunal (No. 2), Dhanbad dated 11th of October, 1991 in an industrial dispute referred to it under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.2. By the said award the Tribunal upholding


Jan 16 2006

Employers in Relation to the Management of Sudamdih Colliery of Bharat ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-16-2006

Reported in: AIR2006SC946; 2006(2)ALD25(SC); 2006(1)BLJR197; [2006(1)JCR250(SC)]; JT2006(1)SC411; (2006)ILLJ820SC; 2006(1)SCALE284; (2006)2SCC329; 2006(3)SLJ428(SC)

is a camouflage to conceal the real relationship between principal employer and the workmen, then also the workmen employed through unlicensed contractor are liable to be treated as workmen of the principal employer.5. Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, … Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Appellant calls in question the legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Patna High Court upholding the judgment of the learned Single Judge. By


Feb 01 2008

Employers Management West Bokaro Colliery of Tisco Ltd. Vs. Concerned ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-01-2008

Reported in: AIR2008SC1162; 2008(56)BLJR1286; 2008BusLR359(SC); [2008(116)FLR1108]; [2008(2)JCR5(SC)]; JT2008(2)SC272; (2009)ILLJ220SC; (2008)3MLJ61(SC); RLW2008(3)SC2083; 2008(2)SCALE1; 2008(3)SCC729; 2008-II-LLJ-309; 2008(2)Supreme28

Ashok Bhan, J.1. Leave granted.Management is in appeal.The respondent-workman was working as Senior Dumper Operator under the Management of the appellant. The workman was deputed at Open


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial