Re Creative - Judgment Search Results

Magic Lantern Productions, Through Ms. Rajita Sharma, Partner and Viac ...

Court: Mumbai

12th october 2009 entered into between the petitioner and the respondent herein c pending the institution continuation and conclusion of the both parties 12 by third mou referred to as the creative directors mou it was agreed between the parties that the

Shailesh Harinarayan Bajaj Vs. Creative Garments Limited and Another

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2000(1)BomCR146

further the judgment debtor having failed to comply with the requisitions contained in the insolvency notice has committed an act of creative garments respondent no 1 and is also concerned with creative outwear limited respondent no 2 as he is the chief

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Creative Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(152)ELT77TriDel

not we do not therefore find any reason for the respondents to have a bona fide belief that the goods manufactured is available to demand duty of excise from m s creative engineers pvt ltd 2 shri rajeev tondon learned sdr submitted

Indian Railway Welfare Organisation vs.creative Consortium

Court: Delhi

being in force by any party to a dispute with regard to any amount due under section 17 consequently what section through mr a k tewari mr vikramaditya singh advs versus creative consortium respondent through ms gurkamal hora arora ms s jain

Indian Institute of Technology Vs. Creative Construction

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(5)BomCR235; 2007(5)MhLj323

secretary irrigation department govt of orissa v g c roy reported in 1991 2scr924 ruled that it will appear from what no 109 of 1999 hereinafter called the appellants m s creative construction are the appellants in appeal no 349 of 1999

Mahima Management Services Private Limited Vs. Creative Property Devel ...

Court: Kolkata

..... 243 of 2014 c s no 24 of 2014 mahima management services private limited versus creative property developers private limited anr for the petitioner defendant mr pratap chaterjee sr adv mr ..... it appears to the court that it is an abuse of the process of court re litigation on the self same issue is an instance of abuse of the process of .....

Eider Pwi Communications Ltd. Vs. Creative Engineering and Constructio ...

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

the architect or any other engineer has been brought on record in the absence of these facts and the important reason regard was executed on 4 11 1996 by m s creative engineering and construction company of panchkula the work in question

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Creative Dyeing and Printing Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2010)229CTR(Del)250; [2009]318ITR476(Delhi); [2009]184TAXMAN483(Delhi)

of its shareholders such shareholders will be deemed to have received the said amount out of the accumulated profits and would

Union of India Vs. Creative Software (P) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997IIAD(Delhi)865; 66(1997)DLT383; 1997(41)DRJ371; (1997)116PLR41

orally that he is present in response to the summons received in the present case the defendant did something more not

In Re: Shailesh Harinarayan Bajaj Vs. Creative Outerwear Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(6)BomCR758; 2004(1)CTLJ377(Bom); 2004(1)MhLj606

among others as useful guides to test the question of repugnancy in zaverbhai amaidas v state of bombay 1955 1scr799 this