Re Compensation - Judgment Search Results
Unemployment Compensation Comm'n Vs. Aragon
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-09-1946
Comm'n v. Aragon, 329 U.S. 143 (1946) Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Aragon No. 25 Argued February 27, 1946 Reargued November 13, 1946 Decided December 9, 1946 329 U.S. 143 CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR
Sushil Kumar Upadhyay vs.commissioner Employees Compensation Act & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-18-2017
Mrs. Santosh Jain, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the
M/S Hadiso Construction Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.commissioner Employees Compen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2017
Petitioners Through: Mr. Dr. (Maj.) J.C. Vashista, Ms. Yashika Sood, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Atul Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. M.K. Rathee, Mr. J.P. Sikka, Advocates for respondents No.3
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Aveena Milk Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner Employees Compensation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anup Trehan and Mr.Akarsh Bhalla, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for R-1. Mr.R.K. Nain, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.
Saroj Kumar Jha vs.commissioner Workmens Compensation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
Advocate with the petitioner in person. versus COMMISSIONER WORKMENS COMPENSATION & ORS Through: Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Umesh Sharma, CGSC for UOI with Mr.Abhinav Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA
Sh. Pushpender Singh Chawla vs.commissioner Employees Compensation Act ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
Mr.Aditya Singh with Ms.Deepti Singh Sodhi & ms.Mehak Nakra, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Kaustubh Anshu Rai, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1.
Rajasekharan Nair vs Employees Compensation Commissioner
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-10-2024
MUMBAI, PIN - 400059BY ADVS. G.P.SHINOD AJIT G ANJARLEKAR GOVIND PADMANAABHAN GAYATHRI S.B. ATUL MATHEWS RESPONDENT/S: 1 EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER (INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COURT), HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, 4TH FLOOR, SANTHINAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 … 2024 PETITIONER/S: RAJASEKHARAN NAIR AGED 58 YEARS S/O. SREEDHARAN NAIR, KARTHIKEYAM, T.C. 34/495, BEACH P.O, SANGHUMUGHAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695007, NOW RESIDING AT 101 STERLING APARTMENTS, MAROL CHURCH ROAD, ANDHERI EAST, MUMBAI, PIN - 400059BY ADVS. G.P.SHINOD AJIT G ANJARLEKAR
We Care Facility Management Services, vs the Employees Compensation Co ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-12-2023
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 521. BY ADVS.B.ASHOK SHENOY S.SASIKUMAR THEJALAKSHMI R.S. P.S.GIREESH ARJUN R NAIK AARON ZACHARIAS BENNY RESPONDENTS:1 THE EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER (INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COURT), VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 2 SOMAN,SON OF BHANU, … ASWINA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 19864 OF 2023 PETITIONER: WE CARE FACILITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES,PLAMOODU, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 004, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, RAJAN K. NAIR, AGED 63 YEARS, SON OF LATE KRISHNANKUTTY, RESIDING AT AMBAZHAKATTU, CVRA-92, MUKKOLA
Sohanbeer Son of Abhay Ram Vs. Workmens Compensation Commissioner/Assi ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-23-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)AWC2108; [2007(113)FLR619]
husband of respondent No. 1 died during the course of his employment. A claim application under the Workmen's Compensation Act was filed by the father, mother, brother and sister of the deceased. During the pendency of the … Heard Sri R.C. Gupta, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Usha Kiran, the learned Counsel appearing for respondent No. 2.2. The husband of respondent No. 1 died during the course of his employment. A claim application
Raman Agnihotri Vs. Commissioner, Workmen Compensation and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-28-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)AWC1096
No. 1.2. It appears that the respondent No. 2 filed an application under Section 10 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 claiming compensation on account of injury sustained by him while working in the establishment/factory of the … India, inter alia, praying for quashing the order dated 12.11.2008 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent No. 1.2. It appears that the respondent No. 2 filed an application under Section 10 of the Workmen's
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free