Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Ranger - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 25 2006

Uttaranchal Forest Rangers' Asson. (Direct Recruit) and Ors. Vs. State ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-25-2006

Reported in: JT2006(12)SC513; 2006(9)SCALE577; 2007(2)SLJ133(SC)

herein in S.L.P.(c) No. 1860/2006. The appellants in these matters are direct recruits to the post of Forest Rangers in the State of U.P, now Uttaranchal. The respondents are the State of U.P, State of Uttaranchal and


Jul 09 2018

Ritu Ranger vs.m/s. s.r. Technosoft Pvt. Ltd. & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-09-2018

$~13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"9th July, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2346/2015 RITU RANGER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocate versus M/S. S.R. TECHNOSOFT PVT. LTD. & ANR....... RESPONDENTS Through:


Oct 17 1996

Ranger Breweries Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-17-1996

Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ321HP

be disposed of by a common judgment. Facts are taken from Civil Writ Petition No. 497 of 1995, Ranger Breweries v. State of H.P. and Ors..2. Challenge here in these writ petitions is made to an order


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 24 2026

THANGARASU Vs The Forest Ranger

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-24-2026

MADRASDATED: 24.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL RC No.140 of 2026 Thangarasu ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.State represented by Forest Ranger Forest Range Office, Vedaranyam, Nagapattinam District WLOR No.01/2025 U/s. 9, 27, 31, 32, 39, 50 a,b,c and 51(1A),


Jul 22 2013

Benoy Varghese Vs. Dy.Ranger Padom Forest Station

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-22-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2013 31ST ASHADHA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 4810 of 2013 () ------------------------------- O.R. NO. 3/2013 OF PADAM FOREST...


Jul 30 2013

Mohanan Vs. the Deputy Ranger

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-30-2013

IRAVON, KUMMANNOR P.O., KONNI KOZHENCHERY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.SETHUNATH RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT AND STATE: ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE DEPUTY RANGER, PADOM FOREST STATION, NADUVATHUMOOZHY FOREST RANGE, UNDER KONNI D.F.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC


Oct 21 2013

Appukuttan P.T. Vs. the Deputy Ranger, Marayoor

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-21-2013

POLICE STATION ERNAKULAM DIST, R/A.PAZHAYAVEETTIL HOUSE MANNAMKANDAM P O, THOUSAND ACRE, IDUKKI BY ADV. SRI.M.N.MANOJ RESPONDENT1 THE DEPUTY RANGER, MARAYOOR OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY RANGER, FOREST STATION,MARAYUR2 THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL


May 16 2023

Jojo Joseph vs the Ranger Forest Officer

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-16-2023

53, MARIYA WINTER GARDEN ESTATES APPAPARA.P.O., THIRUNELLY, MANANTHAVADY WAYNADU, PIN - 670646 BY ADV K.R.SUNIL RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE RANGER FOREST OFFICER BEGUR, RANGE, MANANTHAVADY.P.O WAYANAD -., PIN - 2 THE DEPUTY RANGE OFFICER THIRUNELLY FOREST STATTION, WAYANAD,


Jul 15 1994

Bashir Khan Vs. Ranger, Social Vaniki and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jul-15-1994

Reported in: 1996ACJ115; [1995(70)FLR800]; (1995)ILLJ845Raj; 1994(2)WLC573; 1994(2)WLN164

Matched in: Parties Bashir Khan Vs. Ranger, Social Vaniki and ors.


Mar 30 1990

M.S.M. Haneefa and Others Vs. the Forest Ranger, Shencotta Range

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-30-1990

Reported in: 1991CriLJ712

power agent of P.Ws. 1 to 10 Petitioners 12 and 13 are watchmen of the estate.3. The Forest Ranger, Shencottah Range who is the respondent herein, preferred a complaint before the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate Shencottah against


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial