Ram - Judgment Search Results

Ram vs.the State of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1665/2017 Judgment delivered on:17. 01.2019 RAM ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: For

Ram vs.the State of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 05.2019 BAIL APPLN. 514/2019 RAM versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For

Ram Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 12-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Ram ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by: The Inspector of Police, Manavalannagar Police Station, Thiruvallur District. [Crime No.126 of

Ram vs the State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 200091 OF 2024 BETWEEN: RAM S/O MOHAN BHOSLE, AGE. 21 YEARS, OCCUPATION DRIVER, RESIDENCE OF WADDARGA VILLAGE, …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GANESH NAIK,ADVOCATE) AND:1.

Ramli vs Shanavas

Court: Kerala

of JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II,KOTTARAKKARA CRIME NO. 1039/2009 OF Kadakkal Police Station , KollamAPPELLANT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT (CW1): RAMLI S/O. MUHAMMED SALI, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KALLADATHANNI, POREDAM, CHAYAMANGALAM, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.KIRAN PETER KURIAKOSE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED

Ram Vs. Murlidhar and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2008(2)KarLJ141; 2008(1)KCCR218; 2008(1)AIRKarR412; AIR2008NOC629; 2008(2)ICC852; 2008AIHC1391(Kar)

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This civil revision petition Under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 is by the 2nd defendant in O.S. No. 85 of 2006 on the file of the I Additional Civil...

Ramful Vs. Mukhtyar Singh and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2(2000)ACC144; 2000(2)MPLJ11

arguments advanced by Counsel for both sides and perused the record. It has come in the evidence of Ramful that in truck accident he suffered fracture in his right leg. It had become deformed. He could not

Ram and ors. Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 44(1991)DLT241

S.C. Jain, J. (1) The charge against the appellants Siri Ram, Rati Ram @ Ratia, Leela Ram @ Leelu is that they along with other co-accused (eight in all)

Ram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1977WLN544

1973 the petitioners Gigaram and Magharam and in revision No. 413 of 1973 the petitioners are Surajaram and Ramuram sons of Kanaram. All the four petitioners were convicted for the offence under Section 147 I.P.C. and sentenced

Ram Vs. Naraini

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 5(1969)DLT105

C.J. (1) The facts giving rise to this revision may briefly be stated. Smt. Naraini, wife of Siri Ram (petitioner in this Court), approached the Nyaya Panchayat at Chandpur, Parnaga and Tehsil Sadar District Bilaspur, for maintenance