Raj - Judgment Search Results

Raj Vs. The State

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 11.2009 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.15573 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 Tamil Nadu Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd., Represented by its Secretary, M.Natarajan ...Petitioner Vs 1.State...

Raj vs the District Collector

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1. Raj Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District CollectorDistrict Collector Office, Perumthittivalagam Villupuram District 2.The Sub Collector Sub Collector Office, Jakkampettai, Tindivanam

RAJ Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, The Additional Chief Secretary to Gove ...

Court: Chennai

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN AND Raj S/o. Periyasamy, No.1/141, Meala Street, Muthanchetti, ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu, The Additional Chief Secretary to

Raj Vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Sedapatt ...

Court: Chennai

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07.04.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 6609 of 2026 1.Raj 2.Lakshmipriya ... petitioners Vs State of Tamil Nadu...

Raj Vs. the State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10972 of 1992 (O&M) Date of decision: July 9, 2014 Raj ...Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE K. KANNAN1 Whether Reporters of local

S.Ponnuswamy Vs. Raj

Court: Kerala

SHANMUGHAM, GRACE COTTAGE,SHANMANKULI KARA, (PUTHACHIVAYAL),MARAYOOR VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM TALUK,IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.SUJESH MENON V.B. RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: ------------------------------------------------------------ RAJ,S/O.MUTHU,HOUSE NO.MP.VII/8, SHAMMANKALI KARA,MARAYOOR VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM TALUK,IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.SATHISH NINAN SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN

Archna Dev vs.raj

Court: Delhi

ARCHNA DEV ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rakesh Rao, Proxy counsel for Mr.Rajeev Ranjan Pandey, Advocate with appellant in person. RAJ versus Through: Mr. Arun Vohra, Advocate with respondent in person. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

Hanuman and anr. Vs. Raj.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1951Raj131

made by the District Magistrate, Cehuru, who has recommended that the proceedings taken by the First Class Magistrate Rajgarh, being without jurisdiction be questioned by this Court. The facts relevant for the present purpose are stated as

Heersingh and ors. Vs. Raj.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1951Raj135

Matched in: Parties Heersingh and ors. Vs. Raj.

Kartar Singh Kishan Singh Vs. Raj.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1951Raj129

Matched in: Parties Kartar Singh Kishan Singh Vs. Raj.