Railway Administration - Judgment Search Results
Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi Vs. Pa ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-18-2008
Reported in: 2008(3)ARBLR349(SC); 2008(4)AWC3689(SC); (2008)4CompLJ39(SC); [2008(4)JCR16(SC)]; (2008)7MLJ1240(SC); 2008(11)SCALE500; (2008)10SCC240; 2008AIRSCW5939
Matched in: Parties Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi Vs. Patel Engineering Company Ltd.
North Eastern Railway Administration, Gorakhpur Vs. Bhagwan Das (D) by ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-11-2008
Reported in: AIR2008SC2139; 2008(3)AWC2898(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(3)CHN125; JT2008(4)SC587; (2008)8MLJ789(SC); 2008(6)SCALE254; (2008)8SCC511; 2008AIRSCW3159; 2008(2)LH(SC)1455; 2008(3)ICC612
D.K. Jain, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by North Eastern Railway Administration arises out of orders dated 17th July, 2002 and 14th June, 2005 passed by the High Court of
South Eastern Railway Administration, Calcutta and anr. Vs. Govindlal ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-30-1983
Reported in: 2(1984)ACC183; AIR1984Bom223; 1984MhLJ443
shortage of 9.05 quintals isn other 14 bages due to misconduct and negligence on the part of the railway administration. The trial Court found that they plaintiffs allegations had about conspiracy between the respondent No.3 and the railway … administration. The trial Court found that they plaintiffs allegations had about conspiracy between the respondent No.3 and the railway administration had not been established, nor was it established that the railway receipt had been fraudulently prepared. The trial
18-section briefs on any result in this list
South Eastern Railway Administration and anr. Vs. Govindlal Gopikishan ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-30-1983
Reported in: II(1984)ACC183
shortage of 9.05 quintals in other 14 bags due to misconduct and negligence on the part of the railway administration. The trial Court found that the plaintiff's allegations about conspiracy between the respondent No. 3 and the railway … administration. The trial Court found that the plaintiff's allegations about conspiracy between the respondent No. 3 and the railway administration had not been established, nor was it established that the railway receipt had been fraudulently prepared. The trial
Nellai Concrete Products and Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd Vs Southern Rai ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-03-2026
Matched in: Parties Nellai Concrete Products and Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd Vs Southern Railway Administration
Charubala Saha and ors. Vs. Eastern Railway Administration and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-18-1987
Reported in: II(1988)ACC598,AIR1988Cal327
victim Janardan Saha for compensation of Rs. 50.000/- had been allowed as against the main respondent the Eastern Railway Administration. The facts of the case in so far those are relevant for our purpose may briefly be summed … victim. Personath's application was thus rejected. Being aggrieved thereby Personath has filed this Misc. appeal against the Eastern Railway Administration as also against Sujata.3. Mr. Mukherjee, the learned Advocate appearing for Personath, the appellant, has frankly conceded before
Hargovind Sharma Vs. Divisional Engineer Railway Administration South ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-1963
Reported in: AIR1966MP7
Matched in: Parties Hargovind Sharma Vs. Divisional Engineer Railway Administration South Eastern Railway and anr.
Panna Lal Vs. East Indian Railway Administration and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-04-1952
Reported in: AIR1952All880
Matched in: Parties Panna Lal Vs. East Indian Railway Administration and anr.
M/S. Continental India Pvt. Ltd. vs General Manager, Northern Railways ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2026
reply) M/S. CONTINENTAL INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Decree Holder Through: Ms. Monisha Handa, Mr. Arnav Chaudhary, Advocates.versusGENERAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAYS ADMINISTRATION & ORS. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Chandresh Pratap, Ms. Swati Mishra and Mr. Prince
Bharat Purohit Mithaiwala Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Wester ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-04-2005
Reported in: AIR2005Bom355; 2005(4)ALLMR195
Matched in: Parties Bharat Purohit Mithaiwala Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Western Railway Administration, Sr. Section Engineer (Land) and the Estate Officer and Divisional Engineer (Estate), Western Rly.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free