Railway Administration - Judgment Search Results

Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi Vs. Pa ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(3)ARBLR349(SC); 2008(4)AWC3689(SC); (2008)4CompLJ39(SC); [2008(4)JCR16(SC)]; (2008)7MLJ1240(SC); 2008(11)SCALE500; (2008)10SCC240; 2008AIRSCW5939

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions2. Noticing two different views in two decisions of this...

North Eastern Railway Administration, Gorakhpur Vs. Bhagwan Das (D) by ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2008SC2139; 2008(3)AWC2898(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(3)CHN125; JT2008(4)SC587; (2008)8MLJ789(SC); 2008(6)SCALE254; (2008)8SCC511; 2008AIRSCW3159; 2008(2)LH(SC)1455; 2008(3)ICC612

D.K. Jain, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by North Eastern Railway Administration arises out of orders dated 17th July, 2002 and 14th

South Eastern Railway Administration, Calcutta and anr. Vs. Govindlal ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2(1984)ACC183; AIR1984Bom223; 1984MhLJ443

due to misconduct and negligence on the part of the railway administration. The trial Court found that they plaintiffs allegations had about … allegations had about conspiracy between the respondent No.3 and the railway administration had not been established, nor was it established that the

South Eastern Railway Administration and anr. Vs. Govindlal Gopikishan ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: II(1984)ACC183

due to misconduct and negligence on the part of the railway administration. The trial Court found that the plaintiff's allegations about conspiracy … allegations about conspiracy between the respondent No. 3 and the railway administration had not been established, nor was it established that the

Charubala Saha and ors. Vs. Eastern Railway Administration and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: II(1988)ACC598,AIR1988Cal327

had been allowed as against the main respondent the Eastern Railway Administration. The facts of the case in so far those are … thereby Personath has filed this Misc. appeal against the Eastern Railway Administration as also against Sujata.3. Mr. Mukherjee, the learned Advocate appearing

Hargovind Sharma Vs. Divisional Engineer Railway Administration South ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1966MP7

which was initially passed by the Estate Officer. South Eastern Railway, Bilaspur. and which was, on appeal, confirmed by the District

Panna Lal Vs. East Indian Railway Administration and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1952All880

application by a plaintiff whose suit for damages against a railway has been dismissed with costs. The applicant is the consignee.

Bharat Purohit Mithaiwala Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Wester ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2005Bom355; 2005(4)ALLMR195

directing the petitioner to remove the unauthorised construction from the railway land. 3. Mr. Panday, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted

Shri Rajkumar Agrawal, Proprietor of Agrawal's Carriers Corporation of ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)107BOMLR243

D.G. Karnik, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the revision applicant.2. This revision application is directed against the order dated 7th...

Union of India, through General Manager, Western Railway Administratio ...

Court: Mumbai

which it was alleged to have been decided that the Railway Administration with a view to restore parity between two parties for