Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Railway Administration - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 18 2008

Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi Vs. Pa ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-18-2008

Reported in: 2008(3)ARBLR349(SC); 2008(4)AWC3689(SC); (2008)4CompLJ39(SC); [2008(4)JCR16(SC)]; (2008)7MLJ1240(SC); 2008(11)SCALE500; (2008)10SCC240; 2008AIRSCW5939

Matched in: Parties Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi Vs. Patel Engineering Company Ltd.


Apr 11 2008

North Eastern Railway Administration, Gorakhpur Vs. Bhagwan Das (D) by ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-11-2008

Reported in: AIR2008SC2139; 2008(3)AWC2898(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(3)CHN125; JT2008(4)SC587; (2008)8MLJ789(SC); 2008(6)SCALE254; (2008)8SCC511; 2008AIRSCW3159; 2008(2)LH(SC)1455; 2008(3)ICC612

D.K. Jain, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by North Eastern Railway Administration arises out of orders dated 17th July, 2002 and 14th June, 2005 passed by the High Court of


Aug 30 1983

South Eastern Railway Administration, Calcutta and anr. Vs. Govindlal ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-30-1983

Reported in: 2(1984)ACC183; AIR1984Bom223; 1984MhLJ443

shortage of 9.05 quintals isn other 14 bages due to misconduct and negligence on the part of the railway administration. The trial Court found that they plaintiffs allegations had about conspiracy between the respondent No.3 and the railwayadministration. The trial Court found that they plaintiffs allegations had about conspiracy between the respondent No.3 and the railway administration had not been established, nor was it established that the railway receipt had been fraudulently prepared. The trial


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 30 1983

South Eastern Railway Administration and anr. Vs. Govindlal Gopikishan ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-30-1983

Reported in: II(1984)ACC183

shortage of 9.05 quintals in other 14 bags due to misconduct and negligence on the part of the railway administration. The trial Court found that the plaintiff's allegations about conspiracy between the respondent No. 3 and the railwayadministration. The trial Court found that the plaintiff's allegations about conspiracy between the respondent No. 3 and the railway administration had not been established, nor was it established that the railway receipt had been fraudulently prepared. The trial


Jun 03 2026

Nellai Concrete Products and Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd Vs Southern Rai ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-03-2026

Matched in: Parties Nellai Concrete Products and Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd Vs Southern Railway Administration


Sep 18 1987

Charubala Saha and ors. Vs. Eastern Railway Administration and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-18-1987

Reported in: II(1988)ACC598,AIR1988Cal327

victim Janardan Saha for compensation of Rs. 50.000/- had been allowed as against the main respondent the Eastern Railway Administration. The facts of the case in so far those are relevant for our purpose may briefly be summed … victim. Personath's application was thus rejected. Being aggrieved thereby Personath has filed this Misc. appeal against the Eastern Railway Administration as also against Sujata.3. Mr. Mukherjee, the learned Advocate appearing for Personath, the appellant, has frankly conceded before


Sep 19 1963

Hargovind Sharma Vs. Divisional Engineer Railway Administration South ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-19-1963

Reported in: AIR1966MP7

Matched in: Parties Hargovind Sharma Vs. Divisional Engineer Railway Administration South Eastern Railway and anr.


Mar 04 1952

Panna Lal Vs. East Indian Railway Administration and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-04-1952

Reported in: AIR1952All880

Matched in: Parties Panna Lal Vs. East Indian Railway Administration and anr.


Apr 21 2026

M/S. Continental India Pvt. Ltd. vs General Manager, Northern Railways ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-21-2026

reply) M/S. CONTINENTAL INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Decree Holder Through: Ms. Monisha Handa, Mr. Arnav Chaudhary, Advocates.versusGENERAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAYS ADMINISTRATION & ORS. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Chandresh Pratap, Ms. Swati Mishra and Mr. Prince


Feb 04 2005

Bharat Purohit Mithaiwala Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Wester ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-04-2005

Reported in: AIR2005Bom355; 2005(4)ALLMR195

Matched in: Parties Bharat Purohit Mithaiwala Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Western Railway Administration, Sr. Section Engineer (Land) and the Estate Officer and Divisional Engineer (Estate), Western Rly.


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial