R V Self - Judgment Search Results

M/S R.V. Infra Projects Rep. by Its Managing Partner G.V. Rao and Othe ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite parties no.1 and 2 have filed appeal ,F.A.No. 477 of 2012 and the opposite … 11. Repairs to leakage of proofs for flat nos.404 and 502 worth of Rs.Amount due to Apple Elevators, Vijaywada worth of Rs.75,000/-5. The opposite party no.1 and 2 remained exparte. 6. The 3rd opposite party resisted the

R.V. Dev @ R. Vasudevan Nair Vs. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Kerala and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC2698; 2007(5)ALD52(SC); 2007(4)ALT35(SC); 104(2007)CLT576(SC); [2007(4)JCR37(SC)]; 2007(3)KLT12(SC); (2007)5MLJ427(SC); 2007(7)SCALE777; (2007)5SCC698

S.B. Sinha, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Interpretation of the provisions of Order XXXIII Rule 10 and Order XXXIII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure as amended in the State of … the State of Kerala inter alia on the premise that he had lost an eye having been a victim of violence of political vendetta as he had suffered facial injury as a result of throwing of an

R.V. Bhupal Prasad Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC140; 1995(2)CTC342; JT1995(6)SC258; 1995(5)SCALE41; (1995)5SCC698; [1995]Supp2SCR658

1. Leave granted.2. Smt. Saleha Begum, the 3rd respondent had demised her property, namely, Shahensha Mahal situated on Congress Road, Governorpet, Vijayawada, A.P. to the appellant for … Smt. Saleha Begum, the 3rd respondent had demised her property, namely, Shahensha Mahal situated on Congress Road, Governorpet, Vijayawada, A.P. to the appellant for a period of 20 years by lease deed dated January 1, 1964 and … The object of Section 6 is to discourage people to act in self-help, however, good their title may be. The licensee in possession for well

Shri R.V. Lyngdoh Vs. State (Delhi) Spl. Establishment

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD(Cri)398; 1999(2)ALLMR(SC)259; 1999(1)Crimes83(SC); [1999(82)FLR638]; JT1999(1)SC455; 1999(1)SCALE405; (1999)2SCC645

of 1982. The High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellant under Section 409 IPC and Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(C) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and dismissed the appeal.2. During the period between … performance of duty and held that there was unlawful retention of Government money by the appellant. Taking this view the Trial court held him liable under Section 409 IPC and Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(C) of

R.V. Srinath Prasad Vs. Nandamuri Jayakrishna and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1056; 2001(2)ALLMR(SC)237; 2001(3)ALT27(SC); JT2001(3)SC303; 2001(2)SCALE347; (2001)4SCC71

D.P.Mohapatra, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The controversy raised in this case relates to the interim custody of the two minor sons of the appellant. He has … the rituals/karma of their deceased mother. The Court permitted the appellant and paternal grand-parents of the children to visit them, if they so desire, twice a month with prior intimation till the matter is finally decided. The

R.V.E. Venkatachala Gounder Vs. Venkatesha Gupta and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1733; 2002(4)ALT1(SC); JT2002(3)SC591; (2002)2MLJ143(SC); RLW2002(3)SC457; 2002(3)SCALE368; (2002)4SCC437; [2002]2SCR983

R.C. Lahoti, J.1. The suit property consists of a building situated on Easvarank oil Street of Tirupur city in … One of the pleas taken by them was that the land, on which the building stood, belonged to Veeraragava Perumal and Visweswara temple and, therefore, the question of the landlord reconstructing any building over the land did

R.V.E. Venkatachala Gounder Vs. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami and V.P. Templ ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC4548; 2004(1)ALD18(SC); (SCSuppl)2004(1)CHN66; [2004(2)JCR34(SC)]; JT2004(6)SC442; (2004)136PLR612; 2003(8)SCALE474; (2003)8SCC752

impugned order the High Court has set aside the judgment and decree of the courts below as a result of which the suit filed by the plaintiff-appellant (hereinafter referred to as 'the appellant') has been ordered to … father at a rent of Rs. 300/- which was enhanced to Rs. 400/- in the year 1965. Arulmigu Visweswaraswamy & Veeraragava Perumal Temples, defendant No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the 'temple') also claim ownership to the

Dr. R.V. Murthy Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC677; (1981)4SCC157

amounts to a serious abuse of the process of the Court inasmuch as it compels the appellant to rebut a charge never made or an allegation never proved against him. Such a cause of action at this … in such a situation the right to give a decision on the difference of opinion between the two vests in the Union Government and the Council of Ministers of the Union Territory is bound by the view

R.V.S.L. Annapurna Vs. R. Saikumar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1981Supp(1)SCC71

two young persons who are parties before us, had led to more than one litigation. It has eventually reached the Supreme Court and we thought that such a case should not be driven to a bitter legal … V.R. KRISHNA IYER, J.- 1. A matrimonial embroglio between the two young persons who are parties before us, had

T.V.R.V. Radhakrishnana Chettiar and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1974SC1862; (1974)2SCC496; 1974(6)LC527(SC)

Ray, C.J.1. These two appeals are by special leave from the judgments dated 4 July, 1972 of the High … Council passed the resolution accepting the proposal of the Government for the dissolution of the Panchayat. 12 persons voted in favour of the resolution and 7 against the resolution for dissolution of the Panchayat.5. On 4 July,