Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

R V R In - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 03 2026

Tvk. R V R Agencies Vs Deputy State Tax Officer -1

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-03-2026

OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P. Nos.19782 and 19784 of 2026 Tvk. R V R Agencies Represented by its Proprietor, Mr.Rajkumar Velladurai, Rathinapuri, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641 027. ..Petitioner Vs Deputy State Tax


Jan 27 2026

R.V.R.Nallasivam (Died) 1.Dr.Sivakami and 2 others Vs N.Kuppammal (Dec ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-27-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA R.V.R.Nallasivam (Died)1. Dr.Sivakami,2. Rajalakshmi D/o.R.V.R.Nallasivam3. R.N.Ramasundaram S/o.Late R.V.R.Nallasivam, No.49, 1st Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai - 600 040. ..Applicant(s)


Oct 12 1979

R.V.R. Nallasivam Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-12-1979

Reported in: (1980)16CTR(Mad)243; [1982]133ITR184(Mad)

Sethuraman, J.1. The assessee is borne in the registers of the Agrl. ITO, Srivilliputtur. For the assessment years 1968-69 to 1972-73, he applied for compounding the agrl. … the assessee. Subsequently, during the course of audit, the staff of the Accountant-General noticed that the lands contained valuable teak trees and reported that these lands also should be taken into account as tope for computation of


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 27 1968

P.R.V.R. Veerappa Chettiar Vs. State of Madras and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-27-1968

Reported in: (1970)1MLJ210

ORDERN. Krishnaswamy Reddy, J.1. The revision petitioner was convicted under Rules 30 (2) and 36 of Schedule IV of the District … service may be taken into consideration for the commencement of the period of limitation. Even taking the extreme view against the prosecution that the finding of impracticability for the first time at least should have been given


Dec 04 2015

M/s. Felguera Gruas India Private Ltd., Visakhapatnam, rep. by its Dir ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-04-2015

Common Judgment:(R. Subhash Reddy, J.) 1. All these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, … In relation to execution of such works, the respondent has entered into three contracts with the appellant herein, viz., contract for on-shore services for coal conveyor package and stacker cum reclaimer for Northern Coal Handling System (Services


Jan 21 1929

P.L.S.P. Muthiah Chetty Through His Son and Authorised Agent Palaniapp ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-21-1929

Reported in: AIR1929Mad627; (1929)56MLJ776

Ramesam, J.1. These two appeals arise out. of the same original suit and in each appeal there is a … which he acknowledges the receipt of Ex. F. Meanwhile the 3rd defendant's son raised a dispute about the validity of the assignment by the 3rd defendant and he issued through his vakil the notice Ex. I contesting


Jan 21 1929

P.L.S.R. Muthia Chetty Through His Son and Authorised Agent Palaniappa ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-21-1929

Reported in: 121Ind.Cas.488

Ramesam, J.1. These two appeals arise out of the same original suit and in each appeal there is a … which he acknowledges the receipt of Ex. F. Meanwhile the 3rd defendant's son raised a dispute about the validity of the assignment by the 3rd defendant and he issued through his Vakil the notice Ex. 1 contesting


Oct 10 1941

P.V.R.R.V.R. Veerappa Chettiar and anr. Vs. V. Ar. V. Vr. Sivagami Ach ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-10-1941

Reported in: AIR1942Mad291; (1941)2MLJ1064

Venkataramana Rao, J.1. This civil miscellaneous appeal, which was later converted into a civil revision petition, arises out of an … Venkataramana Rao, J.1. This civil miscellaneous appeal, which was later converted into a civil revision petition, arises out of


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial