R V R In - Judgment Search Results
Tvk. R V R Agencies Vs Deputy State Tax Officer -1
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-03-2026
OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P. Nos.19782 and 19784 of 2026 Tvk. R V R Agencies Represented by its Proprietor, Mr.Rajkumar Velladurai, Rathinapuri, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641 027. ..Petitioner Vs Deputy State Tax
R.V.R.Nallasivam (Died) 1.Dr.Sivakami and 2 others Vs N.Kuppammal (Dec ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA R.V.R.Nallasivam (Died)1. Dr.Sivakami,2. Rajalakshmi D/o.R.V.R.Nallasivam3. R.N.Ramasundaram S/o.Late R.V.R.Nallasivam, No.49, 1st Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai - 600 040. ..Applicant(s)
R.V.R. Nallasivam Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-12-1979
Reported in: (1980)16CTR(Mad)243; [1982]133ITR184(Mad)
Sethuraman, J.1. The assessee is borne in the registers of the Agrl. ITO, Srivilliputtur. For the assessment years 1968-69 to 1972-73, he applied for compounding the agrl. … the assessee. Subsequently, during the course of audit, the staff of the Accountant-General noticed that the lands contained valuable teak trees and reported that these lands also should be taken into account as tope for computation of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.R.V.R. Veerappa Chettiar Vs. State of Madras and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-27-1968
Reported in: (1970)1MLJ210
ORDERN. Krishnaswamy Reddy, J.1. The revision petitioner was convicted under Rules 30 (2) and 36 of Schedule IV of the District … service may be taken into consideration for the commencement of the period of limitation. Even taking the extreme view against the prosecution that the finding of impracticability for the first time at least should have been given
M/s. Felguera Gruas India Private Ltd., Visakhapatnam, rep. by its Dir ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-04-2015
Common Judgment:(R. Subhash Reddy, J.) 1. All these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, … In relation to execution of such works, the respondent has entered into three contracts with the appellant herein, viz., contract for on-shore services for coal conveyor package and stacker cum reclaimer for Northern Coal Handling System (Services
P.L.S.P. Muthiah Chetty Through His Son and Authorised Agent Palaniapp ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-21-1929
Reported in: AIR1929Mad627; (1929)56MLJ776
Ramesam, J.1. These two appeals arise out. of the same original suit and in each appeal there is a … which he acknowledges the receipt of Ex. F. Meanwhile the 3rd defendant's son raised a dispute about the validity of the assignment by the 3rd defendant and he issued through his vakil the notice Ex. I contesting
P.L.S.R. Muthia Chetty Through His Son and Authorised Agent Palaniappa ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-21-1929
Reported in: 121Ind.Cas.488
Ramesam, J.1. These two appeals arise out of the same original suit and in each appeal there is a … which he acknowledges the receipt of Ex. F. Meanwhile the 3rd defendant's son raised a dispute about the validity of the assignment by the 3rd defendant and he issued through his Vakil the notice Ex. 1 contesting
P.V.R.R.V.R. Veerappa Chettiar and anr. Vs. V. Ar. V. Vr. Sivagami Ach ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-10-1941
Reported in: AIR1942Mad291; (1941)2MLJ1064
Venkataramana Rao, J.1. This civil miscellaneous appeal, which was later converted into a civil revision petition, arises out of an … Venkataramana Rao, J.1. This civil miscellaneous appeal, which was later converted into a civil revision petition, arises out of
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free