Question - Judgment Search Results
“ Now the Question Is of Bonafide Necessity. in This Case Vs. Shri J ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
to the hilt. For ready reference para no.23 of the judgment is reproduced herein below:- “ not the question is of bonafide necessity. In this case, the appellant claimed that the premises is required by them in
The Petitioners Question the Validity of Vs. Savita Rani and Another . ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
Mohinder 2014.04.03 14:47 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.6258 of 2014 [2].The petitioners question the validity of Notifications dated 11.07.2006 (Annexure P-2) and 16.07.2007 (Annexure P-4) issued under Sections 4 & 6
Question. the Documents Upon Which the Vs. Deep Singh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
evidence. He has not been able to prove the said resolution and his possession over the land in question. The documents upon which the Saini Pushpinder 2014.03.27 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“3. the Only Question in This Case Is Whether a Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
the case of Daulat Ram versus State of Punjab, AIR 196.S.C.1206 has held as under: “3. The only question in this case is whether a complaint in writing as required by S.195 had been presented by the
“5. the Basic Question Which Requires to Be Vs. State of Punjab and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
the post of Carpentry Instructor. As per pleadings on record the petitioner had applied for the post in question and had appeared before the Subordinate Services Selection Board for an interview in the year 1998. It is
there Are Six Petitions Which Raise a Common Question Being Vs. Union ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
In CWP No.9931 of 2002. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) There are six petitions which raise a common question being the present two petitions and Civil Writ Petitions No.4739, 4799, 4772 and 4773 of 2002. We had
“from the Perusal of Fir Matter in Question Appears Vs. State of Pun ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-08-2014
of motion, the following order was passed by this Court :- “From the perusal of FIR, matter in question appears to be is of civil in nature. Notice to the Advocate General, Punjab for 08.07.2014. In the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free