Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Quartering - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 12 2011

The Chief of Army Staff, Army Head Quarters Vs. the Chief of Army Staf ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on: Jan-12-2011

the rank of Subedar Major. He was also called for interview at Air Defence Artillery (Co-ordination), Army Head Quarters along with four Junior Commissioned Officers (clerks). According to the petitioner, the Interview Board told him that he


Nov 05 1996

Commander Head Quarter, Calcutta and Others Vs. Capt. Biplabendra Chan ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-05-1996

Reported in: 1996VIIIAD(SC)678; AIR1997SC2607; JT1997(10)SC371; 1996(8)SCALE66; (1997)1SCC208; [1996]Supp8SCR472; 1997(1)SLJ143(SC)

1. Heard the Counsel for both the parties.2. Leave granted.3. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dismissing the writ appeal preferred by the appellants. The respondent...


May 23 2024

Habeeb @ Quarter @ Arif , vs State of Kerala,

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-23-2024

JYAISHTA, 1946 BAIL APPL. NO. 2313 OF 2024 CRIME NO.1821/2023 OF Pathanamthitta Police Station, Pathanamthitta PETITIONER/S: HABEEB @ QUARTER @ ARIF ,AGED 38 YEARS S/O RAHIM,'PALLIMURUPPEL VEEDU',VALAMCHUZY, KUMBAZHA MURI, PATHANAMTHITTA VILLAGE.NOW RESIDING AT ALANKARATHU PUTHEN VEEDU,KULASEKHARAPATHY, PATHANAMTHITTA


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 17 1985

Old Government Quarters Employees Cultural Association and ors. Vs. St ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jul-17-1985

Reported in: (1986)1GLR327

requires to be answered in this petition.2. The petitioner No. 1 is an Association known as Old Government Quarters Employees' Cultural Association. The petitioners Nos. 2 to 57 are Government employees who are occupying Government Quarters situated


Feb 02 1951

Indian Quarter Master's Union and Ors. Vs. P.R. Dutt and Anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-02-1951

Reported in: AIR1951Cal570

of. Sinha J. issued a Rule Nisi on 22nd August 1950.2. The petitioner No. 1 is the Indian Quartermasters' Union consisting of Quartermasters popularly known as seacunnies and the petitioners Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are Seamen.


Nov 25 1997

B. Sharma Rao H. Ganeshmal and anr. Vs. Head Quarters Asst. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-25-1997

Reported in: JT1998(9)SC55; (1998)9SCC577

ORDER1. These special leave petitions are directed against the common judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dated 6-6-1996. They arise out of civil suits filed by the petitioners wherein they had challenged the proceedings initiated...


Jan 04 2008

Shivaputrappa Bharamappa Maneda Vs. the Head Quarters Assistant,

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-04-2008

Reported in: ILR2008KAR900; 2008(3)KarLJ171; 2008(1)KCCR365; 2008(3)AIRKarR130

ORDERAnand Byrareddy, J.1. This petition coming on for preliminary hearing, is heard for final disposal on merits, having regard to the question of law on which the petition turns.2. The brief facts of the case are...


Jul 31 2012

Ashish Lodhi Vs. Commandant Head Quarters

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-31-2012

W.P.No.21926/11 31/07/12 Shri N.C.Beohar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Gaharwar, learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner was a candidate who submitted an application for appointment on the post of 'L.D.C.' In pursuance to the advertisement...


Aug 11 1993

Amanjot and anr. Vs. Army Head Quarters Western Command (a Branch) and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-11-1993

Reported in: (1994)106PLR67

taken place. That apart, case of the petitioners is that respondent No. 3 is managed by Army Head Quarters, Western Command (A Branch), Chandi Mandir and the same is admittedly within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.


Jul 30 1999

Layak Ram Vs. Quarter Master General and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-30-1999

Reported in: 1999VAD(Delhi)246; 81(1999)DLT395; 1999(50)DRJ777; ILR1999Delhi165

was working as 4th class employee on daily wages with respondent No. 2 namely Canteen Manager, Army Head Quarter, Block Q, Saina Bhawan, New Delhi. It is the case of the petitioner that he was appointed in


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial