Q - Judgment Search Results

Qatar Airways q.c.s.c vs.airports Authority of India & Anr

Court: Delhi

$~26. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) No.52/2017 QATAR AIRWAYS Q.C.S.C ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sumeet Lall, Ms. Yashasvi Singh and Mr. Sidhant Kapoor, Advs. versus .....

Qatar Airways q.c.s.c vs.bird Worldwide Flight Services India Pvt Ltd

Court: Delhi

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 949/2016 Through: Ms. Marisha Shukla, Advocate. QATAR AIRWAYS Q.C.S.C BIRD WORLDWIDE FLIGHT SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD..... Defendant ..... Plaintiff versus Through: Mr. Virender Mehta, Advocate

Q Rich Interior Vs The State Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

31.12.2024 and consequential appellate order of the 2nd respondent in APL - 02 GSTIN/Temp ID/UIN:33AXEPC3741R1ZC dated 04.11.2025 and quash the same as arbitrary, bad in law and direct the 1st respondent to hear the case on merits.

Ooredoo Q P S C vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Karnataka

OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1593 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN: OOREDOO Q.P.S.C, M/S OOREDOO QATAR (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S. QTEL), C/O TAX COMPAAS, OFFICE AT 56/1, FIRST FLOOR, KANAKAPURA ROAD,

P.a.Q. Meeran vs the Union of India

Court: Kerala

following prayers: i. Call for the records leading to the issue of Ext.P4 by the second respondent and quash the amendment to Rule 7 in Chapter III Part VI of the Rules of the Bar Council of

Ooredoo Q P S C vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Karnataka

OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO. 29731 OF 2024 (T-IT) BETWEEN: OOREDOO Q P S C M/S OOREDOO QATAR (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MS. QTEL) C/O TAX COMPASS OFFICE AT 56/1 FIRST

Q-soft System and Solutions (P) Ltd. Vs. Sri H.N. Giridhar S/O H.G. Sh ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: III(2008)BC381; ILR2008KAR643; 2008(4)KarLJ240; ILR2008(1)Kar643; 2008(4)KLJ240; 2008(1)KCCR75; 2008(2)AIRKarR287; AIR2008NOC1294; 2008CriLJNOC550; 2008(4)CivilLJ72; 2008(3)AICLR213; 2008(3)ICC619

H.V.G. Ramesh, J.1. This appeal is against the order of acquittal passed by the 16th Addl. CMM., Bangalore, dated 1.10.07.2. Heard the Counsel for the appellant3. The case of the appellant is that the respondent being...

M.Q. Ahiyashanear Swamy Age: 45 Years. Vs. State by Hassan City Police ...

Court: Karnataka

1. Memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner to dismiss the petition with liberty to file a fresh bail application, Memo is accepted. Petitioner is at liberty to file bail application, if he...

Smt.Q.George Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

counsel for the petitioner. Ms.Sharda Dubey, learned Panal Lawyer for the respondents-State on advance copy. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. Stating that the petitioners is also similarly placed person that of Dharam Pal

Smt. Q. George Vs. Shri Sanjay Singh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

the benefits of 5 th pay commission recommendation as directed by this court is not being paid. The question has been decided in various cases and in W.P.No.2029/2000 (V.V.Asthana and others versus State of M.P.and others directions