Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Purchase Value - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 06 2023

Haryana Power Purchase Centre Vs. Sasan Power Ltd

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-06-2023

‘REPORTABLE’ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11826 OF2018HARYANA POWER PURCHASE CENTRE Appellant(s) VERSUS SASAN POWER LTD & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.11927 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.12190 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL … of Power; and (ii) In the case of imports by a Central Public Sector Undertaking, the quantity, total value, description and specifications of the imported goods are certified by the Chairman and Managing Director of the said


Dec 01 2008

Mohindra Hire Purchase (Regd.) Vs. Jarnail Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-01-2008

Reported in: 2009CriLJ1161; JT2009(1)SC379

Matched in: Parties Mohindra Hire Purchase (Regd.) Vs. Jarnail Singh


Apr 07 1999

Ganga Hire Purchase Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-07-1999

Reported in: AIR2000SC449; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)320; 2000CriLJ587; 2000(70)ECC18; 2000(121)ELT9(SC); JT1999(10)SC254; (1999)5SCC670

ORDER1. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether on account of the hire purchase agreement, the appellant can be held to be the owner within the ambit of Sub-section (3) of Section


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 15 2007

Shrilekha Hire Purchase Finance Ltd. Vs. Tci Hu Ways Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-15-2007

Reported in: 2007(5)ALD424; 2007(5)ALT798

the said amount, and that the revision petitioner, in its capacity as the financer of the said car, purchased by second respondent under a hire purchase agreement with it, is trying to interfere with the possession of … prayer for injunction against the revision petitioner as a consequential relief, nor are the necessary paragraphs containing the value of the suit for the relief of injunction claimed are mentioned therein, and there is no reference to


Mar 18 2005

Central Store Purchase Organisation, Rep. by Its Industries Officer, S ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-18-2005

Reported in: 2006(4)ALT693

Matched in: Parties Central Store Purchase Organisation, Rep. by Its Industries Officer, S.K. Nazeer HussaIn Vs. Hemarajani Tubes Pvt. Ltd. and anr.


Nov 17 2004

Deep Hire Purchase P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Interest-tax (Appeals)

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-17-2004

Reported in: (2005)195CTR(P& H)174; [2005]274ITR69(P& H)

1981, on which reliance had been placed by the assessee was only in respect of the requirement of tax deduction under Section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and had no application to the Interest-tax Act. He


Nov 17 2004

Deep Hire Purchase (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-17-2004

Reported in: [2005]144TAXMAN417(Punj& Har)

Accordingly, he completed the assessment and computed chargeable interest as under :Rs.(i)Hire-purchase charges earned 4,75,745(ii)Interest other than hire purchase earned 2,282 Total chargeable interest 4,78,027Similarly, the assessment for the assessment year 1993-94 was completed on 14-3-1996, and … of the Interest-tax Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), read with section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Arnritsar Bench, Amritsar (for short 'the


Jan 30 2009

Purchasing Management International and anr. Vs. Rajat Pandhi and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-30-2009

Reported in: 157(2009)DLT267

this provision was deleted. It has again been restored by Amendment Act 22 of 2002 but with an added proviso to prevent application for amendment being allowed after the trail has commenced, unless the court comes to


Jan 20 2005

Vivek Hire Purchase and Leasing Limited Rep. by Its Vice President, Mr ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-20-2005

Reported in: [2006]129CompCas343(Mad); 2005(1)CTC524; (2005)2MLJ8; [2005]62SCL245(Mad)

ORDERA. Kulasekaran, J.1. The petitioner carries on business of hire purchase and lease financing of machineries and other materials. The respondent company approached the petitioner with a request to


Jun 09 2009

Madras Hire Purchase Association Represented by Mr. NitIn Sagan Vs. Un ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-09-2009

Reported in: (2009)225CTR(Mad)289; (2009)5MLJ1137; [2009]18STJ235(Madras); 2009[16]STR3; (2009)25VST446(Mad)

the petitioners submitted that the writ petitioners are non banking financial companies engaged in the business of hire purchase and leasing; that 46th Amendment inserted Article 366(29A), of the Constitution of India, in which Clauses a to … therefore, difficult to hold that in a case of this nature, sales tax would be payable on the value of the entire contract, irrespective of the element of service provided. The approach of the assessing authority, to


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial