Purchase Value - Judgment Search Results
Haryana Power Purchase Centre Vs. Sasan Power Ltd
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-06-2023
‘REPORTABLE’ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11826 OF2018HARYANA POWER PURCHASE CENTRE Appellant(s) VERSUS SASAN POWER LTD & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.11927 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.12190 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL … of Power; and (ii) In the case of imports by a Central Public Sector Undertaking, the quantity, total value, description and specifications of the imported goods are certified by the Chairman and Managing Director of the said
Mohindra Hire Purchase (Regd.) Vs. Jarnail Singh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-01-2008
Reported in: 2009CriLJ1161; JT2009(1)SC379
Matched in: Parties Mohindra Hire Purchase (Regd.) Vs. Jarnail Singh
Ganga Hire Purchase Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-07-1999
Reported in: AIR2000SC449; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)320; 2000CriLJ587; 2000(70)ECC18; 2000(121)ELT9(SC); JT1999(10)SC254; (1999)5SCC670
ORDER1. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether on account of the hire purchase agreement, the appellant can be held to be the owner within the ambit of Sub-section (3) of Section
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shrilekha Hire Purchase Finance Ltd. Vs. Tci Hu Ways Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-2007
Reported in: 2007(5)ALD424; 2007(5)ALT798
the said amount, and that the revision petitioner, in its capacity as the financer of the said car, purchased by second respondent under a hire purchase agreement with it, is trying to interfere with the possession of … prayer for injunction against the revision petitioner as a consequential relief, nor are the necessary paragraphs containing the value of the suit for the relief of injunction claimed are mentioned therein, and there is no reference to
Central Store Purchase Organisation, Rep. by Its Industries Officer, S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-18-2005
Reported in: 2006(4)ALT693
Matched in: Parties Central Store Purchase Organisation, Rep. by Its Industries Officer, S.K. Nazeer HussaIn Vs. Hemarajani Tubes Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Deep Hire Purchase P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Interest-tax (Appeals)
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-17-2004
Reported in: (2005)195CTR(P& H)174; [2005]274ITR69(P& H)
1981, on which reliance had been placed by the assessee was only in respect of the requirement of tax deduction under Section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and had no application to the Interest-tax Act. He
Deep Hire Purchase (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-17-2004
Reported in: [2005]144TAXMAN417(Punj& Har)
Accordingly, he completed the assessment and computed chargeable interest as under :Rs.(i)Hire-purchase charges earned 4,75,745(ii)Interest other than hire purchase earned 2,282 Total chargeable interest 4,78,027Similarly, the assessment for the assessment year 1993-94 was completed on 14-3-1996, and … of the Interest-tax Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), read with section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Arnritsar Bench, Amritsar (for short 'the
Purchasing Management International and anr. Vs. Rajat Pandhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2009
Reported in: 157(2009)DLT267
this provision was deleted. It has again been restored by Amendment Act 22 of 2002 but with an added proviso to prevent application for amendment being allowed after the trail has commenced, unless the court comes to
Vivek Hire Purchase and Leasing Limited Rep. by Its Vice President, Mr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2005
Reported in: [2006]129CompCas343(Mad); 2005(1)CTC524; (2005)2MLJ8; [2005]62SCL245(Mad)
ORDERA. Kulasekaran, J.1. The petitioner carries on business of hire purchase and lease financing of machineries and other materials. The respondent company approached the petitioner with a request to
Madras Hire Purchase Association Represented by Mr. NitIn Sagan Vs. Un ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-09-2009
Reported in: (2009)225CTR(Mad)289; (2009)5MLJ1137; [2009]18STJ235(Madras); 2009[16]STR3; (2009)25VST446(Mad)
the petitioners submitted that the writ petitioners are non banking financial companies engaged in the business of hire purchase and leasing; that 46th Amendment inserted Article 366(29A), of the Constitution of India, in which Clauses a to … therefore, difficult to hold that in a case of this nature, sales tax would be payable on the value of the entire contract, irrespective of the element of service provided. The approach of the assessing authority, to
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free