Public Right - Judgment Search Results

St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad Co. Vs. Public

Court: US Supreme Court

ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY, & COLORADO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. No. 96. KANSAS CITY

State of Missouri, Ex Rel. Washington University Vs. Public

Court: US Supreme Court

STATE OF MISSOURI, EX REL. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY v. PUBLIC - 275 U.S. 489 (1927) U.S. Supreme Court STATE OF

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Gamini Bala Koteswara Ra ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)1; 2008(1)ALT(Cri)72

and the surrounding circumstances....21. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor relied on a decision in State of U.P. v. him with stick. Though he sustained injury on occipital bone, right leg and right side of back, they were not shown

A.P. Public Service Commission Vs. Prasada Rao and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

in the select list as prepared by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission and amongst them, who have pursuant to the

Sahota Public School, Basi Machhian, Tehsil Zira, District Ferozepur V ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2012(1)RCR(Civil)628

Lok Adalat is for deciding the disputes in matters of public utility service and the term 'public utility service' is also that if there is a separate enactment that governs the rights of parties, there shall be no scope for the Board

Delhi Public School and anr. Vs. Director of Education and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)421; 97(2002)DLT118

upon the observations made in Para 19 of Frank Anthony Public School Employees' Association v. Union of India and Ors. : of the teachers is applicable, then the learned counsel is right in contending that unless and until reasons are given for

Union Public Service Commission Vs. Dr. Mahesh Mangalat

Court: Delhi

interest. The competent authority has to carefully consider whether such public interest outweighs the interest sought to be protected under these the country cannot be excluded from the protection of the rights guaranteed by Part III by reason merely of their being

United Public Workers Vs. Mitchell

Court: US Supreme Court

of his legal rights, but only possible injury to the public ( Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co., 310 U. S. 113 individuals and a community interest which sought to qualify those rights, we have insisted that the statute be "narrowly drawn to

Public Utilities Comm'n Vs. Pollak

Court: US Supreme Court

Page 343 U. S. 459 "Further, it is evident that public comfort and convenience is not impaired and that, in fact, S. 463 . 5. The radio programs do not invade rights of privacy of the passengers in violation of the Fifth

Committee for Public Education Vs. Nyquist

Court: US Supreme Court

sectarian institutions, suit was brought to enjoin the disbursement of public money to those schools. Speaking of the constitutionality of such course, that this Court has long recognized and maintained the right to choose nonpublic over public education. Pierce v. Society of