Public Right - Judgment Search Results

St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad Co. Vs. Public

Court: US Supreme Court

94. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND, & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI et al. No. 95. ST. LOUIS,

State of Missouri, Ex Rel. Washington University Vs. Public

Court: US Supreme Court

OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Gamini Bala Koteswara Ra ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)1; 2008(1)ALT(Cri)72

cannot discard their testimony....24. On the same aspect, the learned Public Prosecutor relied on the decision in State of U.P. v. him with stick. Though he sustained injury on occipital bone, right leg and right side of back, they were not shown

A.P. Public Service Commission Vs. Prasada Rao and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

the select list which was prepared by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission pursuant to the judgment and order of this

Sahota Public School, Basi Machhian, Tehsil Zira, District Ferozepur V ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2012(1)RCR(Civil)628

Lok Adalat is for deciding the disputes in matters of public utility service and the term 'public utility service' is also that if there is a separate enactment that governs the rights of parties, there shall be no scope for the Board

Delhi Public School and anr. Vs. Director of Education and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)421; 97(2002)DLT118

upon the observations made in Para 19 of Frank Anthony Public School Employees' Association v. Union of India and Ors. : of the teachers is applicable, then the learned counsel is right in contending that unless and until reasons are given for

Union Public Service Commission Vs. Dr. Mahesh Mangalat

Court: Delhi

be kept confidential. Since the Selection Committee is performing a public function, its members must necessarily be subjected to public scrutiny the uncontrolled power vested within the ambit of the Fundamental Right of Information. Furthermore, the only information that can be sought

United Public Workers Vs. Mitchell

Court: US Supreme Court

in support of candidates for office; be connected editorially with publications which are identified with the legislative program of UFWA [former The argument of unconstitutionality because of interference with the political rights of a citizen by that time was dismissed in a

Public Utilities Comm'n Vs. Pollak

Court: US Supreme Court

forth the following as one premise for its conclusions: "A public opinion survey was conducted by Edward G. Doody & Company, believe what one wishes, are important aspects of the constitutional right to be let alone. If we remembered this lesson taught

Committee for Public Education Vs. Nyquist

Court: US Supreme Court

sincere our collective protestations of the debt owed by the public generally to the parochial school systems, the wholesome diversity they of private school children are given in addition to the right that they have to send their children to public schools