Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Providently - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 11 1923

JoslIn Mfg. Co. Vs. Providence

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-11-1923

Joslin Mfg. Co. v. Providence - 262 U.S. 668 (1923) U.S. Supreme Court Joslin Mfg. Co. v. Providence, 262 U.S. 668 (1923) Joslin


Jul 27 2005

Assistant Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Employees Provident ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2005

Reported in: 122(2005)DLT502; 2005(83)DRJ647; [2006(108)FLR35]; (2006)IILLJ388Del

B.C. Patel, C.J.1. Assistant Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Meerut has filed writ petition No. 4544 of 1999 under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of


Jan 30 2006

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Employees' Provident Fund App ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-30-2006

Reported in: (2006)2CALLT112(HC),(2006)IIILLJ192Cal

the second respondent against his order dated June 30, 2000 levying damages under Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.2. The second respondent is an establishment governed by provisions of the Employees'


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 10 2012

Central Provident Fund Vs. Central Provident Fund

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-10-2012

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 10th January, 2012 + W.P.(C) 940/2006 % CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. Versus CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND EMPLOYEES' UNION ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.P.


Apr 16 2012

The Assistant Provident Fund Vs. the Employees Provident Fund.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-16-2012

order by giving reasons. The learned counsel submits that Section 7(L) read with para 32(a) of the Employees Provident Fund scheme makes it clear that the Tribunal is entitled to reduce the damages in appropriate cases. The


Oct 21 2011

Employees Provident Fund Organization Vs. Employees Provident Fund App ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-21-2011

of the Court was delivered by Ramachandran Nair, Ag. C.J.- This Writ Appeal is filed by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation challenging the judgment of the learned Single Judge declining to interfere with the order of the


Sep 28 2012

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Employees Provident Fund App ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-28-2012

This Writ Petition has been filed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Visakhapatnam, challenging the order dated 10.05.1999 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal in appeal


Sep 28 2012

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,vi Vs. Employees Provident Fund ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-28-2012

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.7963 OF 200.28.09.2012 Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,Visakhapatnam. Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal and another. Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for Respondents: : :


Sep 26 1984

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Karnataka Vs. Workmen represente ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-26-1984

Reported in: AIR1984SC1897; [1984(49)FLR433]; 1984LabIC1682; (1984)IILLJ503SC; 1984(2)SCALE422; 1984Supp(1)SCC418; [1985]1SCR816; 1985(17)LC121(SC)

(hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') in relation to any industrial dispute concerning the office of the Regional Provident Fund organisation established by the Central Government for that State under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions


Nov 23 2006

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Victory Service Station,

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-23-2006

Reported in: 2009(93)DRJ207

29.5.2000 passed by the E.P.F. Appellate Tribunal whereby the Appellate Tribunal set aside the order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner bringing M/s Victory Service Station and M/s Kapoor Service Station, two petrol pumps in the fold


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial