Provided Always - Judgment Search Results

JoslIn Mfg. Co. Vs. Providence

Court: US Supreme Court

One who came after the enactment and established a business did so with notice that the extra-constitutional compensation provided for would not apply to him. In the difference between an owner who had established a business without

Assistant Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Employees Provident ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 122(2005)DLT502; 2005(83)DRJ647; [2006(108)FLR35]; (2006)IILLJ388Del

making authority to make a provision for prescribing a period for preferring an appeal, however, the rule also provided a further period of 60 days by proviso to sub-rule (2) of Rule 7 of the Rules. In

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Employees' Provident Fund App ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2006)2CALLT112(HC),(2006)IIILLJ192Cal

empowered to grant interest to the second respondent. The admitted position is that no provision of law specifically provided for grant of interest to an establishment in such a case. Advocate for the second respondent has cited

Central Provident Fund Vs. Central Provident Fund

Court: Delhi

rules and orders applicable to the officers and employees of the Central Government drawing corresponding scales of pay: Provided that where the Central Board is of the opinion that it is necessary to make a departure from

The Assistant Provident Fund Vs. the Employees Provident Fund.

Court: Chennai

order by giving reasons. The learned counsel submits that Section 7(L) read with para 32(a) of the Employees Provident Fund scheme makes it clear that the Tribunal is entitled to reduce the damages in appropriate cases. The

Employees Provident Fund Organization Vs. Employees Provident Fund App ...

Court: Kerala

of the Court was delivered by Ramachandran Nair, Ag. C.J.- This Writ Appeal is filed by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation challenging the judgment of the learned Single Judge declining to interfere with the order of the

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Employees Provident Fund App ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

a dispute. He is not a party to the lis. All his decisions are subject to the appeals provided under the statute. In Mohtesham Mohd. Ismail V. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate and another (2007 (8) SCC 254),

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,vi Vs. Employees Provident Fund ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

a dispute. He is not a party to the lis. All his decisions are subject to the appeals provided under the statute. In Mohtesham Mohd. Ismail V. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate and another1, the Supreme Court of

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Karnataka Vs. Workmen represente ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1984SC1897; [1984(49)FLR433]; 1984LabIC1682; (1984)IILLJ503SC; 1984(2)SCALE422; 1984Supp(1)SCC418; [1985]1SCR816; 1985(17)LC121(SC)

which is for purpose of brevity referred to as the State Board in such manner as may be provided for in the Scheme. The crucial provision in Section 5B which, if we may say so with respect, … Judge observed at page 646 thus :A public corporation is a legal entity established normally by Parliament and always under legal authority, usually in the form of a special stutute, charged with the duty of carrying out

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Victory Service Station,

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2009(93)DRJ207

29.5.2000 passed by the E.P.F. Appellate Tribunal whereby the Appellate Tribunal set aside the order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner bringing M/s Victory Service Station and M/s Kapoor Service Station, two petrol pumps in the fold