Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Protein - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 10 1990

Workmen of Karnataka Agro Proteins Ltd. Vs. Karnataka Agro Proteins Lt ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-10-1990

Reported in: [1991(63)FLR216]; ILR1991KAR244

1. The General Secretary, Employees Union of Karnataka Agro Proteins Ltd. (K.A.P.L.), has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the


Mar 12 2025

Tvl Khedut Proteins Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-12-2025

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 12.03.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.Nos.9303 and 9304 of 2025 Tvl.Khedut Proteins, Rep. by its Manager, Mr.Rakeshkumar First Floor, No.5, Nambikkai Munai Complex, Thiruvagoundanur Bye Pass, Suramangalam Main Road, Salem-636


Jan 31 2018

Ajanta Raj Proteins Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.himanshu Foods Pvt Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-31-2018

AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :3. dJanuary, 2018 Date of decision :31. t January, 2018 RFA22016 AJANTA RAJ PROTEINS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr. V.N. Chaturvedi, Advocate. (M-9810280191) HIMANSHU FOODS PVT LTD .....


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 28 2025

Organo Proteins Pvt Ltd Vs MV YM Fountain (IMO 9278090)

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.01.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Organo Proteins Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Director Jacob Mathew .. Plaintiff -vs- MV.YM Fountain .. DefendantPrayer: Civil Suit has


Aug 23 1999

Bamni Proteins Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-23-1999

Reported in: 2003(90)ECC897; 2003(156)ELT650(Bom)

Srikrishna, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Sajjad Hussain waives service for second respondent. By consent, rule called out and heard.2. The petitioner manufactures Ossein and Di-Calcium Phosphate (D.C.P.) Animal Feed Grade. There was a controversy as...


Sep 21 2000

Bamni Proteins Limited Vs. Ajay (Shri)

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-21-2000

Reported in: 2001(2)BomCR744

case with the S.L.P. in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Cochin v. M/s. Kerala Chemicals & Proteins Limited and Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore v. M/s. Rallies India Limited, admitted by the Supreme Court. The


Jan 19 2005

Habeeb Proteins and Fats Extracts Vs. the Commissioner of Commercial T ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-19-2005

Reported in: ILR2005KAR1804

[1967]3SCR557 STATE OF KARNATAKA v. RAGHURAMA SHETTY, : [1981]3SCR280 . STATE OF A.P. AND ORS. v. M/S MODERN PROTEINS LIMITED, 1994 Suppl.(2) SCC 496. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. v. V.M. SALGAONKAR AND BROTHERS (P) LIMITED AND


Sep 28 2004

Premier Proteins Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-28-2004

Reported in: (2005)193CTR(MP)37

ORDERAM. Sapre, J.This is an application made by assessee under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act consequent upon the dismissal of their application made under section 256(1) of the Act by the Tribunal by order...


Apr 24 2000

Century Proteins Ltd. Vs. Sham Sunder (Haryana) Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-24-2000

Reported in: AIR2000P& H224; (2000)126PLR25

M/s Sham Sunder (Haryana) Industries Pvt. Ltd. (plaintiffs) had filed a suit for permanent injunction against M/s. Century Proteins Ltd. (defendant) seeking to restrain and forbid the defendant from infringement of trade name, copy rights and passing


Aug 26 2004

Guru Proteins Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-26-2004

Reported in: (2004)192CTR(P& H)42; [2005]278ITR636(P& H)

Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against order of the Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'B' in respect of asst. yr. 1995-96.2. Only question relevant for decision of this appeal is the...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial