Skip to content


Protectiveness - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: protectiveness Page 1 of about 582 results (0.175 seconds)
Jun 03 2008 (HC)

Dr. P. Rajaji Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary to the ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2009)1MLJ31

..... issued g o ms no 204 co operation food and consumer protection department dated 25 5 2001 and ordered to conduct elections to ..... in g o 2d no 36 co operation food and consumer protection department dated 19 4 2007 the registrar of co operative societies ..... societies through g o 2d no 36 co operation food and consumer protection department dated 19 4 2007 through which the registrar and functional .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2006 (HC)

K. Thirunavukkarasu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2006)2MLJ615

..... by the first respondent in g o ms no 94 co operation food and consumer protection department dated 19 5 2000 according to the feeder category seniority of the petitioner 2 ..... by the first respondent in g o ms no 94 co operation food and consumer protection department dated 19 5 2000 according to the feeder category seniority of the petitioner is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 30 1999 (HC)

Triad Trading Services Ltd., Chitra Towers, 332 Arcot Road, Kodambakka ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1999(3)CTC241; (1999)3MLJ546

..... of the state government on the appellant is all pervasive and the employees had statutory protection and therefore the appellant being an authority or even instrumentality of the state would be ..... jurisdiction when any citizen or person is wronged the high court will step in to protect him be that wrong be done by the state an instrumentality of the state a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 23 2010 (HC)

Mr. Arvind Navinchandra Mafatlal, Chairman Emeritus of Nocil Ltd. and ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2010(112)BomLR1880

b r gavai j 1 the applicants have approached this court invoking its jurisdiction under section 482 of the criminal...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 2008 (HC)

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, a Statutory Corporation C ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(4)ALLMR806; 2008(5)BomCR546

bilal nazki j 1 heard the learned counsel for the petitioner nobody appears for the respondents 2 this petition has...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 28 2010 (TRI)

Consumer Protection and Welfare Committee (Ngo) Vs

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

today the secretary of the commission is present and is being represented by mr sanjay singh the learned counsel and...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 2012 (HC)

Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd.,rep. by Its Dy Vs. Protection of Plant Varie ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

..... by them the scheme of the act provides for the authority constituted thereunder viz the protection of plant varieties and farmers rights authority hereinafter the competent authority to entertain and ..... petition are accordingly dismissed interim orders shall stand vacated parties shall bear their own costs protection of plant varieties and farmers rights act 2001 section 4 2 meetings of authority .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 2012 (HC)

Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd.,Rep. by Its Dy Vs. Protection of Plant Varie ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

..... rights act 2001 for brevity the act this legislation was promulgated by the parliament for protecting the intellectual property rights of plant breeders and farmers over plant varieties developed by ..... them the scheme of the act provides for the authority constituted thereunder viz the protection of plant varieties and farmers rights authority hereinafter the competent authority to entertain and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 08 2005 (HC)

Airport Authority of India Vs. Protective Consultancy and Security Ser ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 125(2005)DLT157

sanjay kishan kaul j ia 7972 1998 under sections 30 and 33 of the arbitration act 1940 1 the objections...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 1968 (FN)

Protective Committee Vs. Anderson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... mortgage be permitted to foreclose unless adequate provision was made to protect their interests or unless they would not be prejudiced by ..... financed primarily through the sale of securities in disregard of the protective provisions of the securities act of 1933 and that the ..... chemically f wrongly assumed that the boilers had been properly protected up to the time of conversion g failed to use .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //