Protectiveness - Judgment Search Results

Consumer Protection Council Vs. A'bad Muni. Corporation

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2000)3GLR727

B.C. Patel, J. 1. The petitioner, Consumer Protection Council, which is registered under the provisions of the Societies Act 1860 and under the provisions of Bombay

The Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, South Centr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(1)ALT517

short question that arises for consideration in all these writ appeals is whether the ancillary staff of Railway Protection Force (herein after called as 'the Force') are entitled to draw the same scales as admissible to other

Raghubir Prasad Son of Gokul Chandra, Head Constable, Railway Protecti ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2005(106)FLR1074]

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Aditya, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Govind Saran, the learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner was transferred from Bareilly Division to Moradabad Division by an...

Railway Protection Force & Ors. versus Prem Chand Kumar & Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025]9S.C.R.558

[2025] 9 S.C.R. 558 : 2025 INSC 1083 Railway Protection Force & Ors. v. Prem Chand Kumar & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 11716 of 2025) 09 September 2025

Inspector, Railway Protection Force, Kottayam versus Mathew K Cherian ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025]1S.C.R.498

[2025] 1 S.C.R. 498 : 2025 INSC 51 Inspector, Railway Protection Force, Kottayam v. Mathew K Cherian & Anr. (Criminal Appeal No. 4169 of 2024) 09 January 2025 [Dipankar

Mullaperiyar Environmental Protection Forum Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC1428; 2006(1)ARBLR374(SC); JT2006(3)SC31; 2006(2)SCALE680; (2006)3SCC643

of the Expert Committee and recommendations and decision by CWC.13. In the writ petition filed by Mullaperiyar Environmental Protection Forum, various prayers have been made. They have, inter alia, prayed that agreements of 1886 and 1970 be

Committee for Protection of Rights of Ongc Employees and Others Vs. Oi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1167; [1990(60)FLR747]; JT1990(1)SC560; (1991)IILLJ271SC; 1990(1)SCALE620; (1990)2SCC472; [1990]2SCR156

made permanent and that the said right to pension, which was part of their conditions of service, is protected under Section 13(1) of the ONGC Act. The petitioners have submitted that persons who were employed on temporary

Karnataka Waqfs Protection Vs. The Secretary to Government

Court: Karnataka

DAY OF APRIL2018BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WRIT PETITION No.13182 OF2018(GM-WAKF) ... PETITIONER BETWEEN: KARNATAKA WAQFS PROTECTION JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE (REGD.) No.2, CARIAPPA BHAVAN, RESIDENCY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 025, REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY,

Nitin Fire Protection Industries Limited vs.gail (India) Limited

Court: Delhi

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:05. 09.2017 + O.M.P. (COMM) 332/2017 NITIN FIRE PROTECTION INDUSTRIES LIMITED........ Petitioner Through Mr.Shikhil Suri, Mr.Shiv Kumar Suri and Ms.Shilpa Saini, Advs. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED versus .....

Well Protect Manpower Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs.lok Nayak Hospital

Court: Delhi

* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.127/2019 13th February, 2019 WELL PROTECT MANPOWER SERVICES PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar ..... Appellant Nath, Advocate (M. No.9810162373), Ms. Shashwat Sagar, Mr. Rishabh