Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of women from domestic violence act 2005 Page 91 of about 1,573 results (0.087 seconds)

Mar 12 2013 (HC)

Abhijit Vs. Dr. Smt. Aruna Tripathi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... aruna tripathi versus abhijeet tripathi & others.is case under section 22 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, (2) complaint case no.662/2010 (smt. ..... matrimonial matter under section 13 of hindu marriage act from indore and under section 9 of hindu marriage act from mandla have been transferred by this court to the court of family judge, jabalpur. 3 ..... 03/2013 date of order : /03/2013 this order shall govern the disposal of aforesaid three m.cr.cs, in which common prayer has been made to transfer criminal cases from court of c.j.m, mandla to court of c.j.m.jabalpur on the ground of convenience of the parties. ..... aruna tripathi versus abhijeet tripathi & others.is case under section 498a ipc read with section 3/4 dowry prohibition act, and (3) complaint case no.1113/2010 (smt. ..... for transferring a case from one court to another comparative inconvenience of the parties should be taken into ..... transfer of aforesaid cases from court of mandla to jabalpur sought mainly on the ground that accused ganeshdatt tripathi, aged 79 years and lady sushma tripathi, aged 46 years are resident of indore having no direct mode of communication to attend dates of ..... having careful comparative consideration regarding conveniences of the parties, in respect of trials of aforesaid cases, it seems not feasible and appropriate to transfer these cases from mandla to jabalpur. ..... tripathi versus abhijeet tripathi & others.under section 406 ipc read with section 6 of dowry prohibition act. 2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2012 (HC)

Satish Kumar Malhotra and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 and divorce petition have also been filed ..... accused persons stayed at karnal at the house of the parents of the complainant and they stated that they have given the flat and cash in fdr to her daughter accused no.4 and also raised the demand from the parents of the complainant to give a flat in the shape of dowry but the father of the complainant shown his inability to give flat in a dowry to the accused persons and thereafter the accused ..... drew my attention to the last five lines of page no.86 of the fir (annexure p8) and has submitted that this act has been committed by the petitioners at karnal and this gives cause of action to the complainant to lodge the fir at ..... him, none of the petitioners either visited karnal with her to commit any act which may attract the offence for which the present fir has been lodged. ..... further submitted that the complainant is still in occupation of the basement portion of the house and for getting that portion vacated from the complainant, her father-in-law filed a suit for her eviction. ..... on such a visit, which was on the way to delhi from pehowa, harassing by way of taunting, nagging etc.cannot be believed ..... the complainant expressed his inability to give flat by way of dowry and thereafter the accused persons again started harassing the complainant by taunting, nagging etc.it could be believed that the accused while returning from pehowa could stay at the parental home of the complainant. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2013 (HC)

Argued By:- Dr.Anmol Rattan Sidhu Senior Advocate with Vs. Manmeet Kau ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter to be referred as the act .). ..... been weighed with the trial magistrate to negate the plea of interim custody of complainant were that (i) as per section 8 of the hindu minority and guardian act, 1956, in case of an unmarried girl, father is the natural guardian and after him, is the mother, (ii) she is getting treatment from pgi chandigarh, (iii) if the custody of child is handed over to the complainant, she will take her to toronto, canada for treatment and (iv) it ..... under the spouse of common law partner in canada was rejected by the canadian authority on the following ground as described in para no.36(2)(a) of the immigration and refuges protection act:- a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of criminality for having been convicted in canada of an offence under an act of parliament punishable by way of indictment, or of two offences under any act of parliament not arising out of a single occurrence. 3. ..... the mere fact that during her compelled/forced stay in india, she was getting some treatment from pgi chandigarh, vide opd slip (annexure p4) and getting physiotherapy from saket artificial limbs centre & orthopedic hospital, by virtue of prescription slips (annexures p5 & p6 colly), ipso facto, is not at all sufficient ground, muchless cogent, to ignore the over-all indicated paramount ..... from the record that the complainant has filed the petition (annexure p9) u/s 12 of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Rajeev Joshi Advocate for Petitioner No.1 with Vs. Unknow ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... document chandigarh cm no.8274-cii in/and fao no.m-186 of 2011 (o & m) -5- (petitioner no.2) had undertaken to withdraw her petition under section 125 of the code of criminal procedure and also to withdraw her complaint under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act and also cmm no.97 of 2011 for grant of maintenance pendente lite. ..... terms of the compromise that there was no hope of reconciliation in the near future and taking into consideration the young age of both the parties and hope of fresh resettlement, respectables and common relatives from both the parties had intervened and prevailed upon them to put to an end to the ongoing litigation and live peacefully without intervention. ..... deliberations were carried out and the parties agreed to file a joint petition for divorce in terms of section 13-b of the hindu marriage act, 1955 ('act' for short) for dissolving their marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. ..... therefore, in case the petition was amended and taken into account from the date of institution of the original petition, the statutory period of one year for the parties to the petition to be living separately before filing the joint petition for divorce would not ..... both the parties had further agreed to receive their belongings from each other and on receipt of their belongings and on receipt of the lumpsum maintenance as detailed above, none of the parties it was agreed shall file any civil, criminal or any other proceedings qua their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2014 (HC)

Whether Respondent No. 1 (Now Appellant) Subjected the Vs. Pritpal Sin ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the appellant had also filed complaint against her husband- malik ramesh 2014.03.20 11:50 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh (106) fao no.m-70 of 2014 -7- respondent no.1 under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, and had also taken proceedings for claiming maintenance under section 125 of the code of criminal procedure. ..... insofar as the phone calls were concerned, the appellant pleaded that her son manpreet singh was to take middle class examinations at kotkapura and respondent no.1 had made a call from kuwait to respondent no.2 asking the latter to take care of the child during the examination time and the telephone calls were made by respondent no.2 in that regard, which were mostly attended by the father-in-law of the ..... regarding the money, she stated that she had withdrawn the entire amount from the bank account, which was in her name and in the name of respondent no.1, but again nothing was stated that the amount was withdrawn and given to the families of other persons who were known to ..... a panchayat was convened where the appellant admitted that she had relations with respondent no.2 and that she had also withdrawn money from the joint account that she had with her husband, as mentioned above. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2014 (HC)

Harish Sharma Vs. Smt. Damini Sharma and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... also paying a sum of rs.7000/- per month for the accommodation which he arranged for the residence of petitioners in terms of orders passed under protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005.11. ..... the epitome of the facts and material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for deciding the instant revision petitions and emanating from the record, is that, the marriage between petitioner-husband arvind kumar sharma 2014.03.22 09:26 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh civil revision nos.270 & 1666 of 2012 2 harish sharma ..... that her husband is working as senior manager with the indian oil corporation and getting the package of ` 9/10 lacs per year, besides minimum salary of ` 1.25 lac per month plus having income from other sources and getting more than ` 50,000/- per month as ta, bonus, medical and other service benefits etc. ..... status, income of husband and the fact that both the children are getting maintenance pendente lite of ` 8000/- each per month u/s 125 cr.pc, the trial court partly accepted the petition u/s 24 of the act and directed the husband to pay a sum of ` 8000/- per month as maintenance pendente lite and ` 5000/- as litigation expenses to respondent-wife, from the date of indicated petition, vide impugned order dated 11.11.2011 (annexure p4) 4. ..... all these facts and circumstances, petitioner no.1 is allowed maintenance pendente lite of rs.8000/- per month payable from the date of petition under section 24 of hindu marriage act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2014 (HC)

Mon Mohan Kohli (The Next Friend and Guardian) Vs. Natasha Kohli and o ...

Court : Delhi

..... becomes her matrimonial home and rights ensuing therefrom under the personal law or today under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 have to be worked upon independently. ..... as under: (a) issue a decree of permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant no.1 thereby injuncting the defendant no.1, his servants, agents or any person claiming through or under him from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property by the plaintiff in any manner whatsoever; (b) issue a decree of permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant no.1 ..... bonds, indemnifying monet and judgment debtor no.2 against any loss that may be suffered by monet or judgment debtor no.2 in the eventuality of judgment debtor no.2 suffering any loss on account of any act of conduct of theirs before the transfer of 600 shares of jey kay in monet; iv) the decree holder and mr.israni shall file within four weeks an upto date duly audited balance sheet of ..... way of increasing the authorized share capital of defendant no.2; (d) pass a decree of permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants thereby restraining the defendants from issuing additional or subscribing to the presently un-subscribed/un-issued 800 shares from the authorized share capital of 2000 of the defendant company; (e) issue a decree of mandatory injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants thereby directing the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2017 (HC)

Rahul Shokeen vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... she had also filed a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (in short dv act ) before the court of learned mm, mahila court, saket, new delhi.7. ..... pursuant to this settlement, the respondent no.2 who is present in the court states that she had withdrawn her petition filed under section 12 of the dv act from the court of ld.mm, mahila court, delhi. ..... courts draw the power of compounding offences from section 320 of the code. ..... both the parties submit that they are living happily and have no problem from each other. ..... she further submits that she has been receiving rs.20,000/- every month from the petitioner. ..... no.25, 3rd floor, amrit nagar, south extension part-1, new delhi from 21.05.2015. ..... from the concerned courts after six months.11. ..... act was pending. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2017 (HC)

Shahnawaz Ali & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... she had filed a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (in short dv act ) before the court of learned mm, mahila court, south east district, saket court, new delhi.8. ..... it was further agreed that the petitioner no.1 shall withdraw his appeal from the court of learned asj, saket court, new delhi.11. ..... he further submits that he had withdrawn his appeal from the court of learned asj, saket court, delhi.12. ..... the petitioner no.1 present in the court states that pursuant to the settlement he had withdrawn his criminal complaint case no.640/2016 from the court of judicial magistrate 1st class. ..... the petitioner no.1 had also agreed to withdraw his complaint case no.640/2016 from the court of judicial magistrate 1st class. ..... act from the court of learned mm, mahila court, new delhi. ..... act from the court of learned mm, mahila court, south east district, saket courts, new delhi. ..... he submits that he had withdrawn his petition for restitution of conjugal rights from family court, bareilly, up. ..... it was also agreed that the petitioner no.1 shall withdraw his petition for restitution of conjugal rights from family court, bareilly, up. ..... she submits that she has received the entire settlement amount from petitioner no.1. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 2017 (HC)

Hari Shankar Raikwar & Ors vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... she preferred a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the dv act ) against the petitioners in the court of learned mm, mahila court, saket, new delhi. ..... the respondent no.2 had agreed to withdraw her petition filed under section 12 of dv act and also the execution petition from the court of learned mm, mahila court, saket, new delhi.9. ..... the petitioner no.1 filed a petition for divorce against the respondent no.2 under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 bearing no.351/2013 before the learned principal judge, family court, jhansi, u.p. ..... she submits that she had withdrawn both her petitions from the court of learned mm, mahila court, saket, new delhi. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she had received a sum of rs.1,50,000/- from the petitioner no.1 at the time of withdrawal of execution petition. ..... she submits that on 10.03.2017, she had received further a sum of rs.1,50,000/- from the petitioner no.1 at the time of withdrawal of petition under section 12 of dv act. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she has received the entire settlement amount from the petitioner. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //