Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of women from domestic violence act 2005 Page 90 of about 1,573 results (0.075 seconds)

Mohd. Zaheer & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... she also filed a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2015 (in short d.v. ..... act from the court of learned mm, mahila court, delhi and 125 of cr.pc from the court of learned principal judge, family court, delhi on the respective dates of hearing. ..... she submits and confirms that she has received the entire settlement amount by cash from the petitioner no.1. ..... resultantly, the respondent no.2 left the matrimonial home and started living with her parents from july, 2011.... ..... act and 125 of cr.pc. ..... act ) before the court of the learned mm, mahila court, delhi. .....

Dinesh Bhandari & Ors vs.state of Nct Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... she also preferred a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2015 (in short d.v. ..... act from the court of learned mm, mahila court, delhi and under section 125 of cr.pc from the court of learned principal judge, family court, delhi. ..... act and 125 of cr.pc from the concerned courts. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she has received the entire settlement amount from the petitioner no.1. ..... act ) before the court of the learned mm, mahila court, karkardooma courts, delhi. .....

Jerambhai Vanmalibhai Patel & Anr vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & ...

Court : Delhi

..... of fir no.55/2017 lodged by the respondent no.2 at ps cwc nanakpura are that she had filed a case under protection of women from domestic violence act at the district court saket which is pending. ..... alleged that prior to december, 2014 the petitioners herein who are the parents of dirshan came to new delhi from surat when they did not reveal the factum of dirshan suffering from psychiatric disorder and that his earlier marriage was dissolved due to psychiatric disorder, thus they played fraud on the ..... learned counsel for the petitioner also contends that the complainant voluntarily left cape town which is demonstrated from the documents placed by the petitioner on record and that the complaint in delhi was made after three months of coming to delhi on the basis of ..... it is the case of the petitioners that the parties stayed in delhi at sheraton hotel from 25th june 2015 up till 1st july, 2015 that is only for a period of six days, whereafter the respondent no.2/complainant and dirshan, son of the petitioners had gone for their honeymoon from 2nd july, 2015 to 7th july, 2015 to udaipur, when the petitioners had no occasion to ..... the function the petitioner no.2 took away all the jewellery given to the complainant by her family members as well as from the side of the accused persons on the pretext of keeping it safely with her. ..... the marriage was materialised through the website shaadi.com and from the very inception all the accused demanded a lavish wedding at a five star hotel with .....

Jitender Chauhan vs.renu Chauhan

Court : Delhi

..... cm(m) no.800/2018 page 1 of 6 secondly, it is contended that the respondent / wife had approached the court of additional chief judicial magistrate (acjm), bhiwani under section 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 praying for grant of an interim maintenance of rs.50,000/- per month by the petitioner / husband and which application was dismissed; it is argued that the respondent / wife in the said proceeding did not render the ..... as far as the contention of the counsel for the petitioner / husband qua the respondent / wife being qualified and capable of earning, i have enquired from the counsel for the petitioner / husband whether not there is large scale unemployment of persons qualified to teach and holding the same qualification as the respondent / ..... directing the petitioner / husband to, under section 24 of the hindu marriage act, 1955, pay maintenance at the rate of rs.20,000/- per month to the respondent / wife ..... i have enquired from the counsel for the petitioner / husband today also to show the plea taken anywhere, of the place from where the respondent / wife was earning during the year 2015-16 or to at least name the place where the respondent / wife is today employed or earning as a teacher for which she holds the ..... bhiwani, handed over the said income tax return and it is thus not clear whether the counsel for the respondent / wife had opportunity to take instructions with respect cm(m) no.800/2018 page 5 of 6 thereto from the respondent/wife. .....

Darshna vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... instituted proceedings under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 against her in laws. ..... the enactment being a social legislation and the same requires limited challenge to is the jurisdiction of lpa5372018 page 11 of 20 to be given liberal interpretation to achieve the mandate of the act of 2007 i.e for the welfare of the parents and senior citizens and for the protection of their life and property, there is no doubt that the tribunal does have the jurisdiction to direct vacation by the children of any property in which the senior citizen has ..... petition filed by dhani ram for eviction was not maintainable as dhani ram had not sought for any relief of maintenance under section 4 of the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as act of 2007) and that getting rent from the shops on ground floor of the property, he did not require any maintenance and as such the claim for eviction without maintenance was not maintainable.4. ..... at the cost of repetition, we may state here that having regard to the object of the act (i) the term transfer shall include actual transfer of title or ownership; the act of allowing possession of property / allowing stay in the property or in part of property from which the senior citizen / parents can earn income to maintain themselves and (ii) similarly the term transferee shall mean the children / legal heir in whose favour the property, is transferred or is in possession of or are .....

Rachana Madan & Anr. Vs.sunil Madan

Court : Delhi

..... the first petitioner (wife) had instituted proceedings under section 12 of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (dv act) in the year 2007, it having been registered as cc no.358 ..... no.3380/2016 page 3 of 6 thereafter in the first appellate court by criminal appeal no.25/2014, the learned counsel for the petitioner, having taken instructions from the first petitioner, who is present in person with her in the court, submits that no relief is pressed in the present petitions respecting unauthorised occupation of plot no.1224, sushant lok, gurgaon, haryana for the reason ..... in the given facts and circumstances, the burden to prove not only the delay but also the additional expenditure flowing from such delay will be placed at the door of the first petitioner who so contends. ..... 3071/2008) seeking quashing of the case of the first petitioner under section 12 of dv act was decided by order dated 02.06.2012, certain observations in (para 16 of) the said order are of some import here and may be extracted as under:-" ..... had remitted the matter to the metropolitan magistrate for deciding the remaining issues and passing appropriate orders, the issues essentially covering the right of the first petitioner to seek additional amount from the respondent towards expenses of education and maintenance of the daughter. ..... grievance has been raised in this regard by the petitioner before the metropolitan magistrate in the proceedings under dv act leading to order dated 02.09.2014 and crl. m.c. .....

Muktaben M. Mashru vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... even, crl.m.c.4206/2018 page 4 of 24 in the case filed under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 against the husband of respondent no.2, the mother-in-law and the brother-in-law, the petitioner is not named as a party ..... untenable in law, hence, is liable to be set aside and is accordingly set aside and the order dated 17.3.2018 of the metropolitan magistrate is liable to be crl.m.c.4206/2018 page 23 of 24 upheld to its original position, however, to protect the interest of the respondents, it would be appropriate to impose a condition to the effect that before de-freezing the accounts of the petitioner, the petitioner and the co-account holder, piyush bhai thakkar, both shall execute bonds ..... supra) has noted that the judgment of the punjab & haryana high court was passed under the prevention of corruption act and the same stands on an entirely different footing and hence cannot be made applicable to the facts of the present ..... not only that, when the magistrate who was trying the petitioner's husband under the official secrets act, her request to be allowed to operate the police contending that the bank account was not "case property" and that the petitioner's remedies lay elsewhere than in the ..... on the next day, accused piyush bhai thakkar withdrew the amount of rs.20 lacs from his account and after one and a half month, on 12.3.2012 accused piyush bhai thakkar, opened a joint account in yes bank in the name of the petitioner, who is his maternal .....

Raju a.T Vs. Shibu Daniel

Court : Kerala

..... the animosity of the 1st respondent towards the petitioners arose in the proceedings with respect to interim custody of a minor child sought for in a case under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 [for brevity "act of 2005"], according to the petitioners.3. ..... the animosity of the 1st respondent is said to have arisen in a proceeding under the act of 2005, wherein one lady working at scotland had approached the magistrate's court, inter alia with a petition under section 21 of the act for interim custody of a three year old child, who was in the custody of her in-laws ..... though on the filing date; the respondents were directed to produce the child and the passport on 14.08.2014, on the said date a lawyer from idukki is said to have appeared for the respondents and sought for an adjournment. ..... the cjm had perused the records of the case to find that there was no positive overt act alleged on accused 2 to 6 whose bail applications were dismissed on the same day. ..... when the matter was called on 14.08.2013, it is stated that a lawyer from wp(c).no.22597 of 2015 - 4 - idukki, where the minor child admittedly resided with the grandparents; appeared and without complying with the earlier order of the court, sought for a variation of the same ..... with respect to the allegations raised on the bail applications filed in crime no.495/14, the specific allegation is that the 1st respondent was favouring one particular advocate and acting with animosity towards the petitioners herein. .....

Deepti Bhandari Vs. NitIn Bhandari and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2012(1)SCC725; 2012(1)SCC(Cri)757; AIR2012SCW293,AIR2012SC326; 2012(2)KCCR35SN; 2012ALLMR(CRI)376; 2012(1)BCR(Cri)790

..... be mentioned that on 5th may, 2009, the petitioner filed a complaint against the respondent no.1 and his family members under the provisions of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, hereinafter referred to as `pwd act') before the upper civil judge (a,b) and judicial magistrate serial no.18 jaipur city, jaipur, being criminal legal case no.13 of 2009. ..... as far as the difficulty expressed on behalf of the parents of the respondent no.1 is concerned, they will be free to apply to the trial court for exemption from personal appearance on the dates of the different cases and if such applications are made, the same should be considered by the trial court looking to the physical difficulties that may be faced by ..... which had been filed by the respondent no.1 under section 9 of the hindu marriage act and case no.65 of 2009, also filed by him under section 25 of the guardians and wards act, 1890, be transferred from the family court at jaipur to a family court of competent jurisdiction in delhi. ..... petitioner also filed transfer petition (civil) nos.856-857 of 2010 for transfer of case no.279 of 2009, which had been filed by the respondent no.1 under section 9 of the hindu marriage act and case no.65 of 2009 also filed by him under section 25 of the guardians and wards act, 1890, from the family court at jaipur to a family court of competent jurisdiction in delhi. ..... quashing of criminal legal case no.13 of 2009 filed by the petitioner under section 12 of the pwd act, 2005. .....

Muhammed Rafi Vs. Kamaru @ Kamarunnisa

Court : Kerala

..... no.3303 of 2011 and cmp no.276 of 2012 in crl.m.c.no.30 of 2011, which is a proceeding instituted upon the petition preferred by the wife of the present revision petitioner, who is the respondent therein under the provisions of the protection of women from domestic violence act.2. ..... . the trial court, while disposing 3 crl.r.p.no.642 of 2012 the said petition, allowed the wife of the revision petitioner to take her personal belongings from the shared household and for which, she can seek assistance of the concerned sho who is directed to provide necessary assistance to the wife of the revision petitioner for the above purpose and ..... . but subsequently, the wife of the revision petitioner was evicted from the said rented house and therefore, the wife has filed another ..... before the trial court, the wife of the revision petitioner moved cmp no.3303 of 2011 with a prayer to restrain the revision petitioner/respondent from forcibly evicting her from the rented house ..... . from the facts and circumstances involved in the case, it appears that the revision petitioner and his wife were resided together in a rented house from where the ..... court is not in a position to interfere with the findings of the lower appellate court and the direction issued in favour of the wife of the revision petitioner, who is the beneficiary of the above act ..... of opinion had taken place among the spouses, which ultimately lead to the filing of m.c.no.30 of 2011 in the trial court, under the provisions of the above act .....