Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of women from domestic violence act 2005 Court: mumbai aurangabad Page 1 of about 23 results (0.081 seconds)

Jul 10 2012 (HC)

Mrs. Shreya W/O Prashant Agale Vs. Prashant S/O Prakash Agale

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... applicant herein has filed criminal miscellaneous application no.1106 of 2011 under sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 before the judicial magistrate first-class, at aurangabad on 22nd july, 2011 and those proceedings are pending before the said ..... criminal miscellaneous application no.1106 of 2011 under sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 before the judicial magistrate first-class, at aurangabad. ..... that, prior to filing this miscellaneous civil application, the respondent has filed proceedings bearing miscellaneous criminal application no.113 of 2012, before the principal seat of this court for transfer of proceedings from aurangabad to panvel court, but the applicant only with a view to counter blast the miscellaneous criminal application no.113 of 2012, has filed the present miscellaneous civil application by suppressing the material ..... it is true that, the respondent has filed the application for transfer of those proceedings from aurangabad to mumbai, however, said application is yet pending at principal seat of this court at bombay, however, the respondent has not invited any order staying aforesaid ..... being matrimonial proceedings, the family court, aurangabad on transfer, should decide hindu marriage petition no.8 of 2011 as expeditiously as possible, however, within six months from the first date of hearing, which will be fixed by the family court, aurangabad. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2012 (HC)

Mrs. Shreya W/O Prashant Agale Vs. Prashant S/O Prakash Agale

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... applicant herein has filed criminal miscellaneous application no.1106 of 2011 under sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 before the judicial magistrate first-class, at aurangabad on 22nd july, 2011 and those proceedings are pending before the said ..... criminal miscellaneous application no.1106 of 2011 under sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 before the judicial magistrate first-class, at aurangabad. ..... that, prior to filing this miscellaneous civil application, the respondent has filed proceedings bearing miscellaneous criminal application no.113 of 2012, before the principal seat of this court for transfer of proceedings from aurangabad to panvel court, but the applicant only with a view to counter blast the miscellaneous criminal application no.113 of 2012, has filed the present miscellaneous civil application by suppressing the material ..... it is true that, the respondent has filed the application for transfer of those proceedings from aurangabad to mumbai, however, said application is yet pending at principal seat of this court at bombay, however, the respondent has not invited any order staying aforesaid ..... being matrimonial proceedings, the family court, aurangabad on transfer, should decide hindu marriage petition no.8 of 2011 as expeditiously as possible, however, within six months from the first date of hearing, which will be fixed by the family court, aurangabad. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2014 (HC)

Syed Akram Ali Vs. Rubina Begum

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... in the proceedings filed under the provisions of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (for short "domestic violence act"), direction is given against the present petitioner, husband to return dahej (jahez) articles to the respondent or to pay rs.2,00,000/- in lump sum towards the price of those articles to the present respondent. ..... court has no hesitation to hold that section 20(1)(c) of the domestic violence act can be used in a case like present one. ..... ascertain as to whether even after the dissolution of the marriage, proceeding can be filed, the scheme of the domestic violence act needs to be seen and particularly definitions of "domestic relationship" given in section 2(f) and "shared household" given in section 2(s) of the act needs to be considered. ..... court held that provisions of section 12, 16, 20 and 22 of domestic violence act were not available to the wife. ..... in the proceedings filed under domestic violence act, many reliefs were claimed but the aforesaid relief is granted by the sessions court in ..... shows that the meaning given in section 3 of the domestic violence act needs to be considered. ..... petitioner that it is the contention of the husband that the parties have taken divorce by mutual consent and document of khulanama has been executed and so the proceeding is not tenable under the provisions of domestic violence act. ..... sides showed relevant record to this court and some argument was advanced on the basis of provisions of the domestic violence act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2013 (HC)

Ritesh Ratilal JaIn and Others Vs. Sandhya and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... person" is given in section 2(a) of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 which is as under: "2(a) "aggrieved person" - means any woman who is, or has been in a domestic relationship with the respondent and who alleges to have been subjected to any act of domestic violence by the respondent; 5. ..... in section 2(f) of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, definition of "domestic relationship" is given as under : "2(f) "domestic relationship" means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, ..... filed for some reliefs under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, by respondent no.1. 2. ..... " the definition of "domestic violence" is given in section 3 of the said act as under : "3) definition of domestic violence - for the purposes of this act, any act, omission or commission or conduct of the respondent shall constitute domestic violence in case it - (a) harms or injures or endangers the health, safety, life, limb or well being whether mental or physical of the aggrieved person or tends to do so and includes causing physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal ..... explanation ii - for the purpose of determining whether any act, omission, commission or conduct of the respondent constitutes "domestic violence" under this section, the overall facts and circumstances of the case shall be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2013 (HC)

ParvIn Firoz Shaikh and Others Vs. Firoz SharfuddIn Shaikh and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... she had applied to the learned chief judicial magistrate, osmanabad for maintenance and consequential benefits under the provisions of section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (for short, the dv act). ..... the learned chief judicial magistrate allowed the application and directed the respondent and his parents not to cause domestic violence to the petitioners. ..... 7) section 20 contemplates monetary relief to the aggrieved person as a result of domestic violence. ..... 8) thus cumulative effect of these provisions illustrate, even if remedies are a available under section 4 of muslim women (protection of rights on divorce)act, 1986, it will not obliterate and defuse the provisions of section 12 of the dv act for a wife to stake claim. ..... imran khan - 2010 (1) scc 666 : 2009 dgls (soft) 1281, explained the legal position in tune with muslim women (protection of rights on divorce) act, and in particular sections 4 and 5 thereof. ..... naturally, the whims of the husband/respondent would not be permitted to deflate the provisions of the dv act, which provides a room to claim maintenance, notwithstanding the effect of section 4 of the muslim women (protection of rights on divorce) act, 1986. ..... object and scope of the dv act is to ensure maintenance to those, who need such protective shelter from the person under an obligation. ..... and provisions of muslim women (protection of rights on divorce) act, 1986 and observed about eligibility of entitlement of the wife to claim maintenance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2015 (HC)

Pallavi Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... it is also relevant to mention that the proceedings under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 has been initiated by the wife in the year, 2005 and neither name of the petitioner is mentioned nor any specific role is attributed to her in the said proceedings. ..... where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the code or the concerned act, (under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provisions in the code of the concerned act, providing efficacious redress for the grievance of the aggrieved party. 7. ..... her husband then poured kerosene on the person of the complainant from back and threw burning match stick on her sari. ..... the view taken by us also lends support from the view taken by the supreme court in cases of (1) preeti gupta and anr. ..... the petitioner has placed on record sufficient material, which clearly indicates that she is residing at pune from the year, 2009. 12. ..... it is alleged that the husband of complainant then took her to backside of the house and poured kerosene from the plastic can. ..... thereafter, immediately again he took her inside and locked the door from inside. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2014 (HC)

Niranjan Vs. Priti

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the proceeding is filed under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter referred as the act). ..... in the proceeding, filed under section 12 of the act, the wife, respondent has claimed the reliefs like compensation/ damages of rs.5 lakhs, make arrangement of separate residence at aurangabad or to pay rent for the same, not to commit domestic violence against her, pay to her monthly maintenance of rs.25,000/- etc ..... the provision of section 12(5) of the act shows that such proceeding is expected to be decided within a period of 60 days from the date of its first hearing. ..... the husband wanted to examine one shri jain who had acted as mediator in the marriage, one tour operator of the tourist company with which this couple had gone to various stations on honeymoon tour and a witness to prove list of gift articles ..... in the main matter, proceeding filed under section 12 of the act, examination in chief, by way of affidavit was filed by the wife on 31st january, 2013 ..... interim maintenance of rs.5,000/- per month was granted from the date of the application till the final disposal of the matter by the court, by order dated 10th january, 2013 ..... the aforesaid circumstances show that husband acted mischievously and he took all possible steps to see that the hearing is protracted and the wife does not get anything ..... statement was made by the learned counsel for the wife, in this proceeding, that till today the wife did not receive a single pie from that amount. 4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2012 (HC)

Chintaman Tukaram Ahire and Others Vs. Karuna Keshv Ahire

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the application is filed for transfer of criminal case no.9 of 2011 filed under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act 2005, by the present respondent. ..... though it is true that the judge will not get influenced only because his staff, is involved as party to the proceeding, this circumstance needs to be considered from the view point of other side and the judge is required to step in the shoes of the party and then think about the matter. 4. ..... the new court is to take care and see that, in any case, the main matter itself is disposed of within three months from the date of receipt of this order. ..... , within 15 days from today. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2016 (HC)

Imran Khan Vs. Sobiya Tabassum

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... she had also initiated proceedings under the provisions of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 etc. ..... it is worth to mention that principle propounded in sections 352 and 354 of the mohammedan law could not be read in isolation, but it should be conjointly considered with provisions of the guardians and wards act, 1890, which vests discretion in the court to issue requisite directions about custody for well beings of the ward. 12. ..... but, the law contemplates that while determining issue of custody of minor child under section 25 of the act mere status of father as natural guardian would not itself be significant for favourable order in the proceedings. ..... the learned trial court rendered findings that the appellant is not entitled for relief of custody claimed under section 25 of the act of 1890 and rejected the petition by impugned judgment and order, which is agitated in this appeal. 7. ..... title of guardian to custody of ward - (1) if a ward leaves or is removed from the custody of a guardian of his person, the court, if it is of opinion that it will be for the welfare of the ward to return to the custody of his guardian, may make an order for his return, and for the purpose of ..... the appellant - father used to travel from parbhani to manwat for his employment and remained out of the house for most of the time of the day. ..... in the meanwhile, taking recourse of section 25 of the act of 1890, the appellant-petitioner moved application for custody of minor son "umarkhan. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2012 (HC)

Komal W/O Vitthal Suryawanshi Vs. Vitthal Dhanaji Suryawanshi

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... dispute that the proceedings which are initiated by the applicant under the provisions of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, at aurangabad, and the respondent has attended and participated in those proceedings. ..... invited my attention to the averments in the application and in particular paragraphs 6 to 10 of the application and submitted that the respondent is attending the proceedings filed by the applicant under the provisions of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 in the court of learned j.m.f.c. ..... certain relief under the provisions of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 in the court of learned j.m.f.c ..... is mental and physical harassment to the respondent-husband at the hands of the applicant-wife and her family members, as stated in detail in written statement, filed in the proceeding initiated under the provisions of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 i.e. m.a. ..... the learned counsel appearing for the respondent relying upon the affidavit in reply, submits that there are threats to the respondent from the applicant and her relatives and if the respondent comes at aurangabad for attending the proceedings, there is danger to his ..... 26-4-2011 at exh.59 wherein she had prayed to direct the respondent-husband to pay amount of ad interim maintenance and until the payment of amount of ad interim maintenance is made, the respondent-husband be restrained from participating in further proceedings in the above said matter. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //