Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of women from domestic violence act 2005 Page 89 of about 1,573 results (0.091 seconds)

Mar 09 2012 (TRI)

Positive Television Private Limited Vs. Ms. Manoranjana Singh and Anot ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... are pending between each other and the proceedings under the protection of women from the domestic violence act, 2005 are also pending and also a petition for divorce. ..... director of the company to sign and execute different documents on behalf of the company and to authorize her with the general powers to apply/file for the licenses and permissions from the ministry of information and broadcasting for uplinking of aforesaid channels and also to get the said name registered with the trademarks office: resolved that mrs. ..... the extract of the minutes of the meeting of the board of directors of the applicants company by which it is resolved that the respondent no.1 is authorized to appear and act on behalf and represent the company inter alia before the trade marks office and also for registration of the names of the channel in the trade marks office. ..... , undertakings, applications, power of attorneys, papers, receipts, all documents relating to the application seeking licenses and permissions from the ministry of information and broadcasting for uplinking of the said tv channels and registration of names of the channels with the trade marks office in the name and on behalf of the company and to do all or any of the acts, deeds, matters and things as may be considered expedient and necessary on behalf of the company. ..... the board also seeks to obtain protection for the names of the tv channels under the relevant rules so as to prevent others from launching similar names in respect of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 2014 (HC)

Gurjant Singh and Others Vs.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... in the proceedings under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (for short 'the act of 2005') the trial court dismissed the application of respondent paramjit kaur claiming interim maintenance vide order dated 04.04.2013. ..... after ten years of that settlement in the year 2004, respondent has moved an application under section 23 of the act of 2005. ..... in appeal, the respondent was allowed interim maintenance @ `2,000 per month from the date of filing of the application. ..... during the period from 2004 to 2014, she has not claimed any maintenance. ..... the mere fact that a house has been given for residence to the son of respondent, do not defeat the right of respondent to claim maintenance from her husband. ..... writing dated 02.06.2006 whereby that house was mehta sachin 2014.05.15 17:17 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crr-1440-2014 -3- partitioned also speak of no settlement regarding a right of respondent to claim maintenance from her husband. ..... as wife, she has a right to claim maintenance from her husband. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2014 (HC)

Manoj Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... on 16-10-2009, instituted proceedings under the protection of women from domestic violence act (vide criminal misc. ..... could not have issued process against the accused with respect to the offence punishable under section 193 of the ipc, on the same facts and for the same act, he could not have issued process with respect to the offence punishable under sections 465 and 471 of the ipc also. ..... of fabricating false evidence, which is punishable under section 193 of the ipc, could not have been taken on the basis of the complainant's complaint, whether on the same facts and for the same act, cognizance of offences punishable under sections 465 and 471 of the ipc could be taken on the complainant's complaint. 16. ..... the significance of the forgery was only to this extent and, therefore, it cannot be treated separately from the offence of giving fabricating false evidence, cognizance of which, admittedly, could not have been taken except on a complaint made by the ..... it appears that the complainant made some enquiries and sought certain information from the concerned authorities and learnt that the accused, who works as a clerk in the office of chief metropolitan magistrate, mumbai, was present in the office on the said ..... or attempt to try to analyze the previous decisions on the issue, which have been discussed and considered by their lordships of the supreme court of india, except observing that the view on this aspect, as reflected from the reported judgments, does not seem to be uniform. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2014 (HC)

Anita Katyal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... the petitioner herein takes refuge under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 in a mischievous attempt to stall the respondent bank from exercising its rights under the securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002. ..... by some 2 convoluted logic, which should not be given any degree of respectability by being noticed in detail, the petitioner refers to the definition section of the 2005 act and to sections 17, 19 and 27 thereof to suggest that the petitioner s rights in respect of a property whereat the petitioner is entitled to reside, cannot be trodden over by the borrowers of the respondent bank. ..... in cours.of the petitioner citing the said act of 2005 to save the property that has already been taken possession of by the respondent bank, the petitioner does not leave out the emotional quotient that is so dear to bollywood. ..... no law nor any fact of any relevance has been cited in this petition for the court to depart from the procedure recognised by the said act of 2002 or interdict the steps taken by the bank. ..... the court : this is a disingenuous attempt by persons who obtained money from the bank and think it is their fundamental right not to repay. ..... one partner of the principal borrower firm had instituted proceedings in this court which culminated in the bank being permitted to take steps in accordance with the orders passed by the magistrate under section 14 of the said act of 2002. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2018 (SC)

Nandakumar Vs. The State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... be out of place to mention that live-in relationship is now recognized by the legislature itself which has found its place under the provisions of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. ..... specified in clause (ii) of section 5; or (c) that the consent of the petitioner, or where the consent of the guardian in marriage of the petitioner was required under section 5 as it stood immediately before the commencement of the child marriage restraint (amendment) act, the 1978 (2 of 1978), the consent of such guardian was obtained by force or by fraud as to the nature of the ceremony or as to any material fact or circumstance concerning the respondent; or (d) that the respondent was at the time ..... such a 4 criminal appeal no.597 of2018marriage is not a void marriage under the hindu marriage act, 1955, and as per the provisions of section 12, which can be attracted in such a case, at the most, the marriage would be ..... -(1) any marriage solemnised, whether before or after the commencement of this act, shall be voidable and may be annulled by a decree of nullity on any of the following grounds, namely:- that the marriage is in contravention of the that the marriage has not been consummated 1(a) owing to the impotence of the respondent; ..... the high court also remarked that apart from the photographs of marriage which were produced in the high court, there was no evidence to show that a valid marriage was solemnised between the parties and that a certificate issued by the local .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2017 (HC)

Nayanika Thakur Mehta vs.mohit Mehta & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter referred as d.v.act ) has been filed by the petitioner against the ..... the petitioner was earning `84,200/- per month, it was considered equivalent to the share which she would have got from the entire family s income; she was held not entitled for any maintenance.8. ..... considering the total income being received by the respondent from various sources, his affluent status, financial soundness and the income from salary received by the petitioner, interim maintenance @ `70,000/- granted by the trial court jointly for the petitioner and her daughter (including `8,000/- being already paid by the respondent for the child) cannot be ..... had an income from fdr to the tune of `7,500/- and `5,300/- from various investments including ppf ..... 10.08.2015, the learned metropolitan magistrate granted maintenance @ `70,000/- per month (including `8,000/- being paid by the respondent no.1 towards tuition fee of baby manasvini) for her maintenance as well as maintenance of the minor daughter from the date of filing of the petition i.e. ..... application under section 23 of the d.v.act was filed by the petitioner to seek interim crl.m.c.407/2016 page 1 of 5 maintenance for herself and her minor child ..... appears that the learned appellate court did not take into consideration various other income and perks received by the respondent from his employer. ..... from his employer, which crl.m.c.407/2016 page 3 of 5 were not part of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2017 (HC)

Rahul Sharma & Ors vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... the respondent no.2 filed an application on 16.09.2014 under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (in short dv act ) and another petition under section 125 of cr.pc for maintenance against the petitioner no.1 before principal judge, family court. ..... (crl) 1283/2017 page 2 of 4 (north-west), rohini, delhi and at two applications filed under section 12 of the dv act from the court of ld.mm-02, mahila court, shahdara district karkardooma, delhi on 03.11.2016. ..... as per this settlement, the parties have decided to part their company from each other and obtain a decree of divorce by mutual consent. ..... at the time of second motion, the respondent no.2 also received further a sum of rs.6,00,000/- from the petitioner no.1 by pay order. ..... it is submitted that the first motion was allowed on 23.09.2016 by the principal judge, the time of family court recording the statement of the parties in the first motion, the respondent no.2 had received an amount of rs.6,00,000/- from the petitioner no.1 by pay-order. ..... respondent no.2 also submits that she has also withdrawn the petition under section 125 of cr.pc from the court of ld. ..... under section 12 of the dv act and petition under section 125 of cr.pc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2017 (HC)

Jai Kishan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... respondent no.2 had also filed a petition on 22.08.2015 under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (in short dv act ) before the court of learned mm, mahila court, delhi and another petition under section 125 of cr.pc for maintenance against the petitioner no.1 before principal judge, family court, delhi. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she had withdrawn her petition filed under section 12 of the dv act from the court of ld.mm-02, mahila court, delhi. ..... by this settlement, the parties have decided to part company from each other and obtain a decree of divorce by mutual consent. ..... respondent no.2 also submits that she has also withdrawn the petition under section 125 of cr.pc from the court of ld. ..... under section 12 of the dv act and under section 125 of cr.pc. ..... respondent no.2 also confirms that since the gold chain was not returned by petitioner no.1, she has received a sum of rs.30,000/- in lieu of the same from petitioner no.1. ..... she confirms having received the entire settlement amount of rs.5,50,000/- from 10.11. w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2017 (HC)

Prabhat Gandhi & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... she had filed a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (in short dv act ) before the court of learned mm, mahila court, north west, delhi. ..... she also filed an appeal being aggrieved by an order passed on her application under section 12 of the dv act before the session judge which was assigned to the court of learned asj, north west, rohini court, delhi. ..... the respondent no.2 submits that she had withdrawn her petition filed under section 12 of the dv act from the court of ld.mm, mahila court, delhi, as well as appeal which was filed against an order passed on her application under section 12 of the dv act before the session judge. ..... she had also agreed to withdrawn appeal which was filed against an order passed on her application under section 12 of the dv act before the session judge. ..... she confirms having received the entire settlement amount of rs.21,00,000/- from the petitioner no.1. ..... under section 12 of the dv act and under section 125 of cr.pc. ..... resultantly, the respondent no.2 along with the child samarth gandhi left the matrimonial home and she started living with her parents with effect from 01.06.2015. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2017 (HC)

Sachin Jindal & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... she had filed a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (in short dv act ) before the court of learned mm, mahila court, north east, district karkardooma. ..... she further states that she had withdrawn her petition filed under section 12 of the dv act from the court of ld.mm, mahila court, north east, delhi. ..... hence, to secure ends of justice, the fir bearing no.332/2016, registered on 12.04.2016 with police station khajuri khas, north east delhi, under sections 498a/406/3ipc and section 4 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 and proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed.12. ..... under section 12 of the dv act and under section 125 of cr.pc.9. ..... respondent no.2 present in the court being represented by her counsel states that she has received the entire settlement amount from petitioner no.1. ..... resultantly, the respondent no.2 left the matrimonial home and she started living with her parents with effect from 20.06.2014.7. ..... no.1504/2017 pursuing with the fir bearing no.332/2016, registered on 12.04.2016 with police station khajuri khas, north east delhi, under sections 498a/406/3ipc and section 4 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961. ..... procedure, 1973 (in short cr.pc ) for quashing of the fir bearing no.332/2016, registered on 12.04.2016 with police station khajuri khas, north east delhi, under sections 498a/406/3ipc and section 4 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961.3. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //