Prosecutor - Judgment Search Results
The Public Prosecutor Vs. Mahadi Thirupathi Reddy and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC3128; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)564; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)287; 2002CriLJ4119; 2002(4)Crimes181(SC); JT2002(6)SC444; 2002(6)SCALE196; (2002)7SCC36
Matched in: Parties The Public Prosecutor Vs. Mahadi Thirupathi Reddy and ors.
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Mytheswar Gangadhar and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-13-2002
Reported in: 2003(10)SCALE52
Matched in: Parties Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Mytheswar Gangadhar and anr.
Public Prosecutor, Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Boya Jaggapuram Ve ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-06-1980
Reported in: AIR1980SC1876; 1980CriLJ1301; 1980Supp(1)SCC480; 1980(Supp)SCC480
Matched in: Parties Public Prosecutor, Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Boya Jaggapuram Venkateswarlu and ors
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Public Prosecutor, Madras Vs. R. Raju and anr., Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-08-1972
Reported in: AIR1972SC2504; 1972CriLJ1699; 1973LC17(SC); 1978(2)ELT410(SC); (1972)2SCC410; [1973]1SCR812; 1973(5)LC280(SC)
Matched in: Parties Public Prosecutor, Madras Vs. R. Raju and anr., Etc.
Public Prosecutor Vs. Molli Venkateswara Viswaswara Kumar,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2008
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)565; 2008(2)ALT(Cri)111; 2008CriLJ1997
19.11.2006, the trial Court acquitted the respondents-A1 to A3 herein. Hence, this appeal by the State.2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that though the eye witnesses turned hostile, there is sufficient circumstantial evidence in the form of medical
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Radhakrishna Nagesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2009
Reported in: 2009CriLJ1870
363 and 376(2)(f) of I.P.C. and was acquitted thereof under Section 235(1), Cr.P.C.2. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the appellant-State and the learned Counsel for the respondent-accused. Perused the records.3. The case of the prosecution
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. ChollangIn Arjuna Rao and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-28-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ2690
acquitted them accordingly, by judgment dated 26-8-2003. Hence, this criminal appeal by the State.7. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the appellant-State and learned Counsel appearing for the respondents A-l and A-2.8. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor
Public Prosecutor Vs. M. Krishnaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2009
Reported in: 2009CriLJ2342
filed by the State and criminal revision case is filed by PW.2.9. Arguments of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the appellant-State, learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and the arguments of the learned Counsel
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Rangam Subbarayudu and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-25-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ2789
Ghulam Mohammed, J.1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the State represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A. P., Hyderabad, against judgment dated 24-3-1999 passed in S.C. No. 252 of 1997 by
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Mirza Amjad Baig
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-2008
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)545; 2008(2)ALT(Cri)51; 2008CriLJ2335
conducted by P.Ws. 11 and 12. Charges were framed and the respondent pleaded not guilty.5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that there is clinching evidence in this case to prove the charge under Section 302, I.P.C. and
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free